Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: vladimir.murzin@arm.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	ruanjinjie@huawei.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	james.morse@arm.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, cl@gentwo.org,
	maz@kernel.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
	will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/20] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_write() casting
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 09:37:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805093710.3c4baf6c@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804170503.3513916-2-mark.rutland@arm.com>

On Tue,  4 Aug 2026 18:04:44 +0100
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:

> The arm64 implementation of this_cpu_write() casts 'val' to unsigned
> long. This is necessary to handle cases where 'val' is a pointer type,
> and to avoid spurious compiler warnings for the (unreachable!) cases
> where the pointer type would be cast to a smaller integer type.
> 
> Unfortunately, the cast is applied to 'val' rather than '(val)', which
> won't always generate the expected value when 'val' is an expression.
> 
> For example, for this_cpu_write(pcp, zero - 1), where 'pcp' is a u64 and
> 'zero' is a u32:
> 
> * 'zero'                      ===> (u32) 0x00000000
> * 'zero - 1'                  ===> (u32) 0xffffffff
> * '(unsigned long)zero - 1'   ===> (u64) 0xffffffffffffffff
> * '(unsigned long)(zero - 1)' ===> (u64) 0x00000000ffffffff
> 
> Fix this by adding brackets around 'val'
> 
> The bug described above can be seen from the disassembly of the
> following test code:
> 
> | void this_cpu_write_zero_minus_1(u64 __percpu *pcp)
> | {
> | 	u32 zero = 0;
> | 	this_cpu_write(*pcp, zero - 1);
> | }
> |
> | void this_cpu_write_zero_minus_1_brackets(u64 __percpu *pcp)
> | {
> | 	u32 zero = 0;
> | 	this_cpu_write(*pcp, (zero - 1));
> | }
> 
> Generated code before this patch:
> 
> | <this_cpu_write_zero_minus_1>:
> |        paciasp
> |        stp     x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
> |        mrs     x1, sp_el0
> |        mov     x29, sp
> |        ldr     w2, [x1, #8]
> |        add     w2, w2, #0x1
> |        str     w2, [x1, #8]
> |        mov     x3, #0xffffffffffffffff
> |        mrs     x2, tpidr_el1
> |        str     x3, [x0, x2]
> |        ldr     x0, [x1, #8]
> |        add     x0, x0, x3
> |        str     w0, [x1, #8]
> |        cbz     x0, 1f
> |        ldr     x0, [x1, #8]
> |        cbnz    x0, 2f
> | 1:     bl      preempt_schedule_notrace
> | 2:     ldp     x29, x30, [sp], #16
> |        autiasp
> |        ret
> |
> | <this_cpu_write_zero_minus_1_brackets>:
> |        paciasp
> |        stp     x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
> |        mrs     x1, sp_el0
> |        mov     x29, sp
> |        ldr     w2, [x1, #8]
> |        add     w2, w2, #0x1
> |        str     w2, [x1, #8]
> |        mov     x3, #0xffffffff
> |        mrs     x2, tpidr_el1
> |        str     x3, [x0, x2]
> |        ldr     x0, [x1, #8]
> |        sub     x0, x0, #0x1
> |        str     w0, [x1, #8]
> |        cbz     x0, 1f
> |        ldr     x0, [x1, #8]
> |        cbnz    x0, 2f
> | 1:     bl      preempt_schedule_notrace
> | 2:     ldp     x29, x30, [sp], #16
> |        autiasp
> |        ret
> 
> Generated code after this patch:
> 
> | <this_cpu_write_zero_minus_1>:
> |        paciasp
> |        stp     x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
> |        mrs     x1, sp_el0
> |        mov     x29, sp
> |        ldr     w2, [x1, #8]
> |        add     w2, w2, #0x1
> |        str     w2, [x1, #8]
> |        mov     x3, #0xffffffff
> |        mrs     x2, tpidr_el1
> |        str     x3, [x0, x2]
> |        ldr     x0, [x1, #8]
> |        sub     x0, x0, #0x1
> |        str     w0, [x1, #8]
> |        cbz     x0, 1f
> |        ldr     x0, [x1, #8]
> |        cbnz    x0, 2f
> | 1:     bl      preempt_schedule_notrace
> | 2:     ldp     x29, x30, [sp], #16
> |        autiasp
> |        ret
> |
> | <this_cpu_write_zero_minus_1_brackets>:
> |        b       this_cpu_write_zero_minus_1
> 
> Fixes: 959bf2fd03b5 ("arm64: percpu: Rewrite per-cpu ops to allow use of LSE atomics")
> Reported-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

I suspect there is no affected code - largely testable by comparing the
output of two arm64 allmodconfig builds.

Reviewed-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>

> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
> index b57b2bb009677..63bbfd4944a37 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
> @@ -179,13 +179,13 @@ PERCPU_RET_OP(add, add, ldadd)
>  	_pcp_protect_return(__percpu_read_64, pcp)
>  
>  #define this_cpu_write_1(pcp, val)	\
> -	_pcp_protect(__percpu_write_8, pcp, (unsigned long)val)
> +	_pcp_protect(__percpu_write_8, pcp, (unsigned long)(val))
>  #define this_cpu_write_2(pcp, val)	\
> -	_pcp_protect(__percpu_write_16, pcp, (unsigned long)val)
> +	_pcp_protect(__percpu_write_16, pcp, (unsigned long)(val))
>  #define this_cpu_write_4(pcp, val)	\
> -	_pcp_protect(__percpu_write_32, pcp, (unsigned long)val)
> +	_pcp_protect(__percpu_write_32, pcp, (unsigned long)(val))
>  #define this_cpu_write_8(pcp, val)	\
> -	_pcp_protect(__percpu_write_64, pcp, (unsigned long)val)
> +	_pcp_protect(__percpu_write_64, pcp, (unsigned long)(val))
>  
>  #define this_cpu_add_1(pcp, val)	\
>  	_pcp_protect(__percpu_add_case_8, pcp, val)



  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-05  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-04 17:04 [PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: Preemptible this_cpu_*() operations Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_write() casting Mark Rutland
2026-08-05  8:37   ` David Laight [this message]
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_and() mask generation Mark Rutland
2026-08-05  9:14   ` David Laight
2026-08-05 13:02     ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-06  8:28       ` David Laight
2026-08-06 10:23         ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] arm64: cmpxchg: LL/SC: Avoid redundant extension Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] arm64: cmpxchg128: LSE: Remove redundant operands Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] arm64: preempt: Simplify and optimize __preempt_count_dec_and_test() Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] arm64: preempt: Treat should_resched() as unlikely Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] arm64: ptrace: Always inline pt_regs_[read,write}_reg() Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] arm64: percpu: Factor out percpu offset asm Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] arm64: gpr-num: Add wxN aliases for wN registers Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] arm64: gpr-num: add __GPR_NUM() helper Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] arm64: entry: sdei: Restore all clobberable GPRs Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] arm64: entry: sdei: Make 'tsk' available Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] arm64: percpu: Add infrastructure for preemptible this_cpu_*() ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 22:45   ` Pedro Falcato
2026-08-05 10:27     ` David Laight
2026-08-05 12:50       ` Pedro Falcato
2026-08-05  6:45   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-05  6:47     ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-06 11:21       ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-06 11:32         ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-06 12:02           ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-06 13:25           ` David Laight
2026-08-06 13:30             ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible read/write ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-05  9:24   ` Ryan Roberts
2026-08-05 12:08     ` David Laight
2026-08-05 13:34     ` Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible void RMW ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible return " Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible XCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG128 ops Mark Rutland
2026-08-04 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] arm64: percpu: Remove _pcp_protect*() wrappers Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260805093710.3c4baf6c@pumpkin \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox