From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: <iommu@lists.linux.dev>, "Joerg Roedel (AMD)" <joro@8bytes.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jpb@kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
"Pasha Tatashin" <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>,
"Pranjal Shrivastava" <praan@google.com>,
Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Precompute the invalidation commands
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 12:10:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ak/yDcoX5R7uWjrH@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709120744.GF422027@nvidia.com>
On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 09:07:44AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> I'm not keen on gotos outside error unwind, but how about
>
> + tlbi->range.data1 =
> + FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_LEAF, !tlbi->table_levels_bitmap) |
> + FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_TG, tg_enc) | (cur_tg << tg_lg2);
> +
> /*
> * SMMUv3 H.a Section 4.4.1.1: TG!=0, NUM==0, SCALE==0, TTL==0 is
> * Reserved and causes CERROR_ILL. Single page uses NUM=0, SCALE=0 with
> @@ -2472,11 +2476,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_tlbi_calc_range(struct arm_smmu_tlbi *tlbi,
> if (WARN_ON(!ttl))
> ttl = 3;
> tlbi->range.data0 = 0;
> - tlbi->range.data1 = FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_LEAF,
> - !tlbi->table_levels_bitmap) |
> - FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_TTL, ttl) |
> - FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_TG, tg_enc) |
> - (cur_tg << tg_lg2);
> + tlbi->range.data1 |= FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_TTL, ttl);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -2513,11 +2513,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_tlbi_calc_range(struct arm_smmu_tlbi *tlbi,
> FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_0_NUM,
> DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(num_tg, 1ULL << scale) - 1) |
> FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_0_SCALE, scale);
> - tlbi->range.data1 =
> - FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_LEAF, !tlbi->table_levels_bitmap) |
> - FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_TTL, ttl) |
> - FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_TG, tg_enc) |
> - (cur_tg << tg_lg2);
> + tlbi->range.data1 |= FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_1_TTL, ttl);
> }
>
> Which removes most of the duplication
Yea, that looks very clean.
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 16:26 [PATCH v2 0/8] Organize the SMMUv3 invalidation flow so iommupt can use it Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-06 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass the parameters for the invalidation in a struct Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 3:04 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-07 11:18 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-07-06 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move pgsize out of arm_smmu_inv Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 3:57 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-07 16:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 17:21 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-08 18:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 11:24 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-07-07 18:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-11 17:38 ` Daniel Mentz
2026-07-10 4:06 ` Daniel Mentz
2026-07-10 14:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-06 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Optimize range invalidation for latency Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 7:27 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-07 19:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 21:07 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-07 11:45 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-07-08 0:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-06 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Keep track in the arm_smmu_invs if RIL is used Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 7:27 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-07 11:46 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-07-06 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Precompute the invalidation commands Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 11:52 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-07-07 14:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-08 9:00 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-07-08 13:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 20:31 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-09 12:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-09 19:10 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2026-07-06 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Populate the tlbi at the top of the call chain Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 11:57 ` Mostafa Saleh
2026-07-08 18:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 21:51 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-08 18:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-06 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Change how the tlbi describes the invalidation Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-06 18:00 ` Robin Murphy
2026-07-06 19:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-08 1:41 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-08 18:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-08 5:29 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-09 18:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-09 21:32 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-06 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support the DS expansion of RIL's SCALE Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 23:20 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-08 0:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-08 2:10 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-08 13:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-07 12:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] Organize the SMMUv3 invalidation flow so iommupt can use it Mostafa Saleh
2026-07-07 15:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ak/yDcoX5R7uWjrH@nvidia.com \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jpb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox