public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Thomas Glanzmann <thomas@glanzmann.de>
Cc: Heinz-Josef Claes <hjclaes@web.de>,
	Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@gmail.com>,
	Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Data Deduplication with the help of an online filesystem check
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:58:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1240952295.15136.73.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090428205242.GA13112@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>

On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 22:52 +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> Hello Heinz,
> 
> > I wrote a backup tool which uses dedup, so I know a little bit about
> > the problem and the performance impact if the checksums are not in
> > memory (optionally in that tool).
> > http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/storebackup
> 
> > Dedup really helps a lot - I think more than I could imagine before I
> > was engaged in this kind of backup. You will not beleve how many
> > identical files are in a filesystem to give a simple example.
> 
> I saw it with my own yes (see my previous e-mail).
> 
> > EMC has very big boxes for this with lots of RAM in it.  I think the
> > first problem which has to be solved is the memory problem.  Perhaps
> > something asynchronous to find identical blocks and storing the
> > checksums on disk?
> 
> I think we already have a very nice solution in order to solve that
> issue:
> 
>         - Implement a system call that reports all checksums and unique
>           block identifiers for all stored blocks.
> 

This would require storing the larger checksums in the filesystem.  It
is much better done in the dedup program.

>         - Implement another system call that reports all checksums and
>           unique identifiers for all stored blocks since the last
>           report. This can be easily implemented:

This is racey because there's no way to prevent new changes.

> 
>           Use a block bitmap for every block on the filesystem use one
>           bit. If the block is modified set the bit to one, when a
>           bitmap is retrieved simply zero it out:

>         Assuming a 4 kbyte block size that would mean for a 1 Tbyte
>         filesystem:
> 
>         1Tbyte / 4096 / 8 = 32 Mbyte of memory (this should of course
>         be saved to disk from time to time and be restored on startup).
> 

Sorry, a 1TB drive is teeny, I don't think a bitmap is practical across
the whole FS.  Btrfs has metadata that can quickly and easily tell you
which files and which blocks in which files have changed since a given
transaction id.  This is how you want to find new things.

But, the ioctl to actually do the dedup needs to be able to verify a
given block has the contents you expect it to.  The only place you can
lock down the pages in the file and prevent new changes is inside the
kernel.

-chris



  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-28 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-27  3:33 Data Deduplication with the help of an online filesystem check Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-27 13:37 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28  5:22   ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 10:02     ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 13:49       ` Andrey Kuzmin
2009-04-28 13:58         ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 14:04           ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:21             ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 20:10               ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 20:29                 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 13:58         ` jim owens
2009-04-28 16:10       ` Anthony Roberts
2009-04-28 15:59   ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 16:04     ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-28 17:29       ` Edward Shishkin
2009-04-28 17:34         ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:38           ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 17:43             ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:45             ` Heinz-Josef Claes
2009-04-28 20:16               ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 20:36                 ` Heinz-Josef Claes
2009-04-28 20:52                   ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 20:58                     ` Chris Mason [this message]
2009-04-28 21:12                       ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 21:26                         ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 22:14                           ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 23:18                             ` Chris Mason
2009-04-29 12:03                               ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-29 13:11                                 ` Michael Tharp
2009-04-29 13:14                                 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-29 13:58                                   ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-29 14:31                                     ` Chris Mason
2009-04-29 15:26                                       ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-29 15:45                                         ` Chris Mason
2009-06-04  8:49                                           ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-06-04 11:43                                             ` Chris Mason
2009-06-04 12:03                                               ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-06-04 12:43                                                 ` Chris Mason
2009-06-05 12:20                                               ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-06-05 12:50                                                 ` Chris Mason
2009-06-05 15:35                                                   ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-29  0:06                       ` Bron Gondwana
2009-05-06 15:16               ` Sander
2009-04-28 17:32       ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:41         ` Michael Tharp
2009-04-28 20:14           ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-05-04 14:29           ` Ric Wheeler
2009-05-04 14:39             ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-04 14:45               ` Ric Wheeler
2009-05-04 15:15                 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-05-04 16:03                   ` Ric Wheeler
2009-05-04 16:16                     ` Andrey Kuzmin
2009-05-04 16:24                       ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-05-04 18:06                         ` Jan-Frode Myklebust
2009-05-04 19:16                           ` Andrey Kuzmin
2009-05-05  8:02                           ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-05-04 16:26                     ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-05-04 19:11                       ` Heinz-Josef Claes
2009-05-04 21:29                         ` Dmitri Nikulin
2009-05-05  7:18                           ` Heinz-Josef Claes
2009-05-24  7:27                         ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:23     ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 17:37       ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:43         ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 20:15           ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 21:19           ` Dmitri Nikulin
2009-04-28 20:24       ` Thomas Glanzmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1240952295.15136.73.camel@think.oraclecorp.com \
    --to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=edward.shishkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=hjclaes@web.de \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
    --cc=thomas@glanzmann.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox