public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>,
	Thomas Glanzmann <thomas@glanzmann.de>,
	Heinz-Josef Claes <hjclaes@web.de>,
	Edward Shishkin <edward.shishk
Subject: Re: Data Deduplication with the help of an online filesystem check
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:35:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A293B5A.3050308@wpkg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090605125016.GA6942@think>

Chris Mason wrote:

>> I wonder how well would deduplication work with defragmentation? One  
>> excludes the other to some extent.
> 
> Very much so ;)  Ideally we end up doing dedup in large extents, but it
> will definitely increase the overall fragmentation of the FS.

Defragmentation could lead to interesting problems if it's not aware of 
dedupliction.


I can imagine "freeing up space" (i.e., as seen by userspace) where 
duplicated blocks are found, but keeping track of duplicated blocks 
internally (and not allowing to overwrite any block which is duplicated).

Only when free space is really needed, "deduplicate" blocks which have 
more copies, and allow to overwrite them with data.

Perhaps complicated though.


-- 
Tomasz Chmielewski

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-05 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-27  3:33 Data Deduplication with the help of an online filesystem check Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-27 13:37 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28  5:22   ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 10:02     ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 13:49       ` Andrey Kuzmin
2009-04-28 13:58         ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 14:04           ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:21             ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 20:10               ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 20:29                 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 13:58         ` jim owens
2009-04-28 16:10       ` Anthony Roberts
2009-04-28 15:59   ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 16:04     ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-04-28 17:29       ` Edward Shishkin
2009-04-28 17:34         ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:38           ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 17:43             ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:45             ` Heinz-Josef Claes
2009-04-28 20:16               ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 20:36                 ` Heinz-Josef Claes
2009-04-28 20:52                   ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 20:58                     ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 21:12                       ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 21:26                         ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 22:14                           ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 23:18                             ` Chris Mason
2009-04-29 12:03                               ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-29 13:11                                 ` Michael Tharp
2009-04-29 13:14                                 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-29 13:58                                   ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-29 14:31                                     ` Chris Mason
2009-04-29 15:26                                       ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-29 15:45                                         ` Chris Mason
2009-06-04  8:49                                           ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-06-04 11:43                                             ` Chris Mason
2009-06-04 12:03                                               ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-06-04 12:43                                                 ` Chris Mason
2009-06-05 12:20                                               ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-06-05 12:50                                                 ` Chris Mason
2009-06-05 15:35                                                   ` Tomasz Chmielewski [this message]
2009-04-29  0:06                       ` Bron Gondwana
2009-05-06 15:16               ` Sander
2009-04-28 17:32       ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:41         ` Michael Tharp
2009-04-28 20:14           ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-05-04 14:29           ` Ric Wheeler
2009-05-04 14:39             ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-05-04 14:45               ` Ric Wheeler
2009-05-04 15:15                 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-05-04 16:03                   ` Ric Wheeler
2009-05-04 16:16                     ` Andrey Kuzmin
2009-05-04 16:24                       ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-05-04 18:06                         ` Jan-Frode Myklebust
2009-05-04 19:16                           ` Andrey Kuzmin
2009-05-05  8:02                           ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-05-04 16:26                     ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-05-04 19:11                       ` Heinz-Josef Claes
2009-05-04 21:29                         ` Dmitri Nikulin
2009-05-05  7:18                           ` Heinz-Josef Claes
2009-05-24  7:27                         ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:23     ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 17:37       ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 17:43         ` Chris Mason
2009-04-28 20:15           ` Thomas Glanzmann
2009-04-28 21:19           ` Dmitri Nikulin
2009-04-28 20:24       ` Thomas Glanzmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A293B5A.3050308@wpkg.org \
    --to=mangoo@wpkg.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=hjclaes@web.de \
    --cc=thomas@glanzmann.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox