From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>, linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Chen Ni <nichen@iscas.ac.cn>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: ucan: Use usb_endpoint_type() rather than duplicating its implementation
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 07:47:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0768a008-d4a9-41ec-bc47-1e7c63362296@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c96a5d2c-0ee1-4e3e-a95d-d38a8f668feb@wanadoo.fr>
>>> it seems that Coccinelle missed many simplifications.
>> Would such software transformations become better supported anyhow?
> Maybe?
>
> I am not involved in the development of Coccinelle and thus, I don't have an answer.
This can be fine (in principle).
> Nor do I have the time to read and understand the Coccinelle source code
> to which you pointed me to.
I hope that more users can become interested in presented information.
I would appreciate if knowledge representations can be improved also for
better automatic data processing and corresponding transformations.
> My stance is that such static analyzers should never be trusted 100%.
This is generally fine.
> The output is more an indicator.
This is usual.
> And in this present case, a quick review made it very
> clear that Coccinelle saw one simplification but missed two other ones.
Would you find another source code adjustment (like the following) more appropriate?
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c b/drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c
index 07406daf7c88..6c6cee3895c6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/usb/ucan.c
@@ -1352,17 +1352,12 @@ static int ucan_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
for (i = 0; i < iface_desc->desc.bNumEndpoints; i++) {
ep = &iface_desc->endpoint[i].desc;
- if (((ep->bEndpointAddress & USB_ENDPOINT_DIR_MASK) != 0) &&
- ((ep->bmAttributes & USB_ENDPOINT_XFERTYPE_MASK) ==
- USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_BULK)) {
+ if (usb_endpoint_dir_in(ep) && usb_endpoint_xfer_bulk(ep)) {
/* In Endpoint */
in_ep_addr = ep->bEndpointAddress;
in_ep_addr &= USB_ENDPOINT_NUMBER_MASK;
in_ep_size = le16_to_cpu(ep->wMaxPacketSize);
- } else if (((ep->bEndpointAddress & USB_ENDPOINT_DIR_MASK) ==
- 0) &&
- ((ep->bmAttributes & USB_ENDPOINT_XFERTYPE_MASK) ==
- USB_ENDPOINT_XFER_BULK)) {
+ } else if (usb_endpoint_dir_out(ep) && usb_endpoint_xfer_bulk(ep)) {
/* Out Endpoint */
out_ep_addr = ep->bEndpointAddress;
out_ep_addr &= USB_ENDPOINT_NUMBER_MASK;
Can the functions “usb_endpoint_is_bulk_in” and “usb_endpoint_is_bulk_out”
be applied here?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16-rc3/source/include/uapi/linux/usb/ch9.h#L572-L595
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-25 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-24 17:12 [PATCH] can: ucan: Use usb_endpoint_type() rather than duplicating its implementation Markus Elfring
2025-06-24 17:29 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-06-24 18:28 ` Markus Elfring
2025-06-24 22:59 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-06-25 5:47 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2025-06-25 15:51 ` [PATCH] " Vincent Mailhol
2025-06-25 16:23 ` Markus Elfring
2025-06-26 2:47 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-06-26 7:22 ` Markus Elfring
2025-06-26 9:23 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-06-26 14:46 ` [PATCH v2] can: ucan: Use two USB endpoint API functions rather than duplicating their implementations Markus Elfring
2025-06-26 14:50 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-06-26 15:06 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-06-26 15:17 ` [v2] " Markus Elfring
2025-06-24 19:21 ` [PATCH] can: ucan: Use usb_endpoint_type() rather than duplicating its implementation Markus Elfring
2025-06-24 23:03 ` Vincent Mailhol
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0768a008-d4a9-41ec-bc47-1e7c63362296@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=nichen@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox