public inbox for linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jie Luo <jie.luo@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Luo Jie <quic_luoj@quicinc.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	quic_kkumarcs@quicinc.com, quic_linchen@quicinc.com,
	quic_leiwei@quicinc.com, quic_pavir@quicinc.com,
	quic_suruchia@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] clk: qcom: cmnpll: Account for reference clock divider
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 15:44:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a982965-4964-4f50-87b6-e3b8a1182876@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d9b953b-5af0-4a81-9182-f1cd47e772f1@oss.qualcomm.com>



On 12/1/2025 9:42 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 11/28/25 3:29 PM, Jie Luo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/28/2025 7:38 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 11/28/25 9:40 AM, Luo Jie wrote:
>>>> The clk_cmn_pll_recalc_rate() function must account for the reference clock
>>>> divider programmed in CMN_PLL_REFCLK_CONFIG. Without this fix, platforms
>>>> with a reference divider other than 1 calculate incorrect CMN PLL rates.
>>>> For example, on IPQ5332 where the reference divider is 2, the computed rate
>>>> becomes twice the actual output.
>>>>
>>>> Read CMN_PLL_REFCLK_DIV and divide the parent rate by this value before
>>>> applying the 2 * FACTOR scaling. This yields the correct rate calculation:
>>>> rate = (parent_rate / ref_div) * 2 * factor.
>>>>
>>>> Maintain backward compatibility with earlier platforms (e.g. IPQ9574,
>>>> IPQ5424, IPQ5018) that use ref_div = 1.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure how to interpret this. Is the value fixed on these platforms
>>> you mentioned, and always shows up as 0?
>>>
>>> Konrad
>>
>> On these platforms the hardware ref_div register comes up with a value
>> of 1 by default. It is, however, still a programmable field and not
>> strictly fixed to 1.
>>
>> The ref_div == 0 check in this patch is only meant as a safety net to
>> avoid a divide‑by‑zero in the rate calculation.
> 
> I think some sort of a warning/bugsplat would be good to have here,
> however I see that clk-rcg2.c : clk_gfx3d_determine_rate() apparently
> also silently fixes up a div0..
> 
> Konrad

I agree it would be better to at least flag this as an invalid
configuration. I can update the code to emit a warning (e.g. WARN_ON
(!ref_div) while still clamping ref_div to a sane value to avoid
crashing in production. That way we preserve the safety net but also
get some visibility if this ever happens.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-04  7:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-28  8:40 [PATCH 0/5] Add CMN PLL clock controller support for IPQ5332 Luo Jie
2025-11-28  8:40 ` [PATCH 1/5] clk: qcom: cmnpll: Account for reference clock divider Luo Jie
2025-11-28 11:38   ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-11-28 14:29     ` Jie Luo
2025-12-01 13:42       ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-12-04  7:44         ` Jie Luo [this message]
2025-12-04 10:16           ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-11-28  8:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add CMN PLL support for IPQ5332 SoC Luo Jie
2025-11-28  9:18   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-11-28  9:39   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-28  8:40 ` [PATCH 3/5] clk: qcom: cmnpll: Add IPQ5332 SoC support Luo Jie
2025-12-01 13:52   ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-12-04  8:09     ` Jie Luo
2025-12-04 13:48       ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-12-05 12:11         ` Jie Luo
2025-11-28  8:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: ipq5332: Add CMN PLL node for networking hardware Luo Jie
2025-12-01 13:52   ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-12-04  7:46     ` Jie Luo
2025-11-28  8:40 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Represent xo_board as fixed-factor clock on IPQ5332 Luo Jie
2025-12-01 13:53   ` Konrad Dybcio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5a982965-4964-4f50-87b6-e3b8a1182876@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=jie.luo@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=quic_kkumarcs@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_leiwei@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_linchen@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_luoj@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_pavir@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_suruchia@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox