From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@quicinc.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@kernel.org>
Cc: Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@quicinc.com>,
Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@quicinc.com>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@quicinc.com>,
Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@quicinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/18] arm64: dts: qcom: Add MXC power domain to videocc node on SM8650
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 11:15:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2cc6dca-0c7a-4607-a23f-7623212dbd8e@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44dad3b5-ea3d-47db-8aca-8f67294fced9@quicinc.com>
On 4/11/25 9:16 AM, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
>
>
> On 4/1/2025 8:57 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 3/27/25 10:52 AM, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
>>> Videocc requires both MMCX and MXC rails to be powered ON to configure
>>> the video PLLs on SM8650 platform. Hence add MXC power domain to videocc
>>> node on SM8650.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@quicinc.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi
>>> index 818db6ba3b3be99c187512ea4acf2004422f6a18..ad60596b71d25bb0198b26660dc41195a1210a23 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi
>>> @@ -4959,7 +4959,8 @@ videocc: clock-controller@aaf0000 {
>>> reg = <0 0x0aaf0000 0 0x10000>;
>>> clocks = <&bi_tcxo_div2>,
>>> <&gcc GCC_VIDEO_AHB_CLK>;
>>> - power-domains = <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_MMCX>;
>>> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_MMCX>,
>>> + <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_MXC>;
>>
>> So all other DTs touched in this series reference low_svs in required-opps
>>
>> Is that an actual requirement? Otherwise since Commit e3e56c050ab6
>> ("soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Make power_on actually enable the domain") we get the
>> first nonzero state, which can be something like low_svs_d2
>>
> Yes, commit e3e56c050ab6 enables the power-domain at first non-zero level, but in
> some chipsets, the first nonzero state could be retention, which is not sufficient
> for clock controller to operate. So required-opps is needed to ensure the rails are
> at a level above retention for clock controller to operate. low_svs was choosen since
> that is a level that is generally supported across all the chipsets, but low_svs_d2
> may not be supported on some chipsets.
>
> And required-opps is not mandatory for MXC power domain due to commit f0cc5f7cb43f
> (pmdomain: qcom: rpmhpd: Skip retention level for Power Domains), which ensures MXC
> always gets enabled above retention level. But it was added to make number of
> required-opps uniform with the number of power domains based on discussion at [1].
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/eoqqz5hyyq6ej5uo6phijbeu5qafbpfxlnreyzzcyfw23pl2yq@ftxnasc6sr2t/#t
Alright, thanks for the explanation!
Konrad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-11 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-27 9:52 [PATCH v3 00/18] clk: qcom: Add support to attach multiple power domains in cc probe Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 01/18] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,sm8450-videocc: Add MXC power domain Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-28 8:09 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-28 8:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 02/18] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Update sc8280xp camcc bindings Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 15:39 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-03-28 8:07 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-28 10:39 ` Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 03/18] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: sm8450-camcc: Allow to specify two power domains Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 15:28 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-03-28 10:39 ` Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-28 8:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 04/18] clk: qcom: clk-alpha-pll: Add support for common PLL configuration function Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 15:51 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-03-27 18:20 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-04-11 7:13 ` Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 05/18] clk: qcom: common: Handle runtime power management in qcom_cc_really_probe Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 12:44 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-03-27 15:58 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-03-28 10:41 ` Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 06/18] clk: qcom: common: Add support to configure clk regs " Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 12:50 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-04-11 7:14 ` Jagadeesh Kona
2025-04-11 8:51 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-04-14 10:09 ` Jagadeesh Kona
2025-04-14 10:13 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 07/18] clk: qcom: videocc-sm8450: Move PLL & clk configuration to really probe Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 12:51 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 08/18] clk: qcom: videocc-sm8550: " Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 13:58 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 09/18] clk: qcom: camcc-sm8450: " Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 13:58 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 10/18] clk: qcom: camcc-sm8550: " Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 15:06 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 11/18] clk: qcom: camcc-sm8650: " Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 12/18] clk: qcom: camcc-x1e80100: " Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 15:59 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 13/18] arm64: dts: qcom: Add MXC power domain to videocc node on SM8450 Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 14/18] arm64: dts: qcom: Add MXC power domain to videocc node on SM8550 Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 15/18] arm64: dts: qcom: Add MXC power domain to videocc node on SM8650 Jagadeesh Kona
2025-04-01 15:27 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-04-01 16:00 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-04-11 7:27 ` Jagadeesh Kona
2025-04-11 7:16 ` Jagadeesh Kona
2025-04-11 9:15 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 16/18] arm64: dts: qcom: Add MXC power domain to camcc node on SM8450 Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 16:03 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-03-28 10:40 ` Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 17/18] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Additionally manage MXC power domain in camcc Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 9:52 ` [PATCH v3 18/18] arm64: dts: qcom: Add MXC power domain to camcc node on SM8650 Jagadeesh Kona
2025-03-27 14:03 ` [PATCH v3 00/18] clk: qcom: Add support to attach multiple power domains in cc probe Rob Herring (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e2cc6dca-0c7a-4607-a23f-7623212dbd8e@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lumag@kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=quic_ajipan@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_imrashai@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_jkona@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_skakitap@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_tdas@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox