Linux CXL
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Anisa Su <anisa.su887@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>,
	linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>, Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
	Ben Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@amd.com>,
	Ira Weiny <iweiny@kernel.org>, Wonjae Lee <wj28.lee@samsung.com>,
	Junhee Park <jh9934.park@samsung.com>,
	Heesoo Kim <habil.kim@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 3/8] cxl/cdat: Gather DSMAS data for DCD partitions
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:35:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a5d67c0-baf7-4b70-a8e9-47dc555d8264@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <arMXg40FTKYB585z@4470NRD-ASU.ssi.samsung.com>



On 9/22/26 5:05 PM, Anisa Su wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 04:05:03PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/22/26 2:15 PM, Anisa Su wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 10:08:08AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/21/26 8:53 PM, Richard Cheng wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 01:30:12PM +0800, Anisa Su wrote:
>>>>>> From: Ira Weiny <iweiny@kernel.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Additional DCD partition (AKA region) information is contained in the
>>>>>> DSMAS CDAT tables, including performance and shareable attributes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Match DCD partitions with DSMAS tables and store the meta data.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <iweiny@kernel.org>
>>>>>> Co-developed-by: Anisa Su <anisa.su@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anisa Su <anisa.su@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Tested-by: Wonjae Lee <wj28.lee@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Tested-by: Junhee Park <jh9934.park@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Tested-by: Heesoo Kim <habil.kim@samsung.com>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Anisa,
>>>>>
>>>>> LGTM but I have limited knowledge for details of device's CDAT.
>>>>> Other experts would be more suitable to leave their tag.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a question here only, I wonder if a CDAT with no DSLBIS supported is
>>>>> possible ? seems that the implementation has the assumption that device's
>>>>> CDAT would be always supported with valid DSMAS and DSLBIS.
>>>>
>>>> According to the spec, the device suppoort DCD shall provide DSMAS (CXL r4.0 9.13.3). DSLBIS is optional.
>>>>
>>>> So I do wonder if we need to add plumbing to disable DCD if DSMAS is missing or malformed. 
>>>>
>>>> DJ
>>>>
>>> Can do. DSMAS is missing/malformed in 3 scenarios:
>>> - CDAT is missing
>>> - Failed to parse DSMAS from the CDAT
>>> - No DSMAS entry matched the DC partition.
>>>
>>> So we can make a helper function to disable DCD and call from all 3 sites:
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * A DCD shall describe its DC partition in a DSMAS entry (CXL r4.0 9.13.3).
>>> + * Without one the partition's attributes are unknown, so disable DCD.
>>> + */
>>> +static void cxl_dcd_dsmas_missing(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, const char *why)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct cxl_memdev_state *mds;
>>> +
>>> +	if (cxlds->type != CXL_DEVTYPE_CLASSMEM)
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>> +	mds = to_cxl_memdev_state(cxlds);
>>> +	if (!cxl_dcd_supported(mds) ||
>>> +	    !cxl_part_size(cxlds, CXL_PARTMODE_DYNAMIC_RAM_1))
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>> +	dev_warn(cxlds->dev, "DC partition has no valid DSMAS entry (%s), disabling DCD\n",
>>> +		 why);
>>> +	cxl_disable_dcd(mds);
>>> +}
>>>
>>> Called if there's no CDAT/fails to parse CDAT:
>>>
>>> void cxl_endpoint_parse_cdat(struct cxl_port *port)
>>>  	int rc;
>>>  
>>>  	xa_init(&__dsmas_xa);
>>> -	if (!port->cdat.table)
>>> +	if (!port->cdat.table) {
>>> +		cxl_dcd_dsmas_missing(cxlds, "no CDAT");
>>>  		return;
>>> +	}
>>>  
>>>  	rc = cxl_cdat_endpoint_process(port, dsmas_xa);
>>>  	if (rc < 0) {
>>>  		dev_dbg(&port->dev, "Failed to parse CDAT: %d\n", rc);
>>> +		cxl_dcd_dsmas_missing(cxlds, "CDAT parse failed");
>>>  		return;
>>>  	}
>>>
>>> Or no DSMAS entry matched the DC partition:
>>> static void cxl_memdev_apply_dsmas(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
>>>  	struct device *dev = cxlds->dev;
>>>  	struct dsmas_entry *dent;
>>> +	bool dc_matched = false;
>>>  	unsigned long index;
>>> ...
>>>  			if (set_perf)
>>>  				update_perf_entry(dev, dent, &part->perf);
>>> -			if (part->mode == CXL_PARTMODE_DYNAMIC_RAM_1)
>>> +			if (part->mode == CXL_PARTMODE_DYNAMIC_RAM_1) {
>>>  				part->shareable = dent->shareable;
>>> +				dc_matched = true;
>>> +			}
>>>  			break;
>>>  		}
>>>
>>> ... 
>>> 			dev_dbg(dev, "no partition for dsmas dpa: %pra\n",
>>>  				&dent->dpa_range);
>>>  	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (!dc_matched)
>>> +		cxl_dcd_dsmas_missing(cxlds, "no matching entry");
>>>  }
>>>
>>> But currently cxl_cdat_endpoint_process() fails if there's no DSLBIS or it's
>>> empty and DSLBIS is optional for DCD, so need a prep patch to allow empty DSLBIS
>>> and skip cxl_port_perf_data_calculate(port, dsmas_xa) if it's empty.
>>
>> But perf calc failure does not stop the probe. cxl_endpoint_parse_cdat() returns void. We swallow the error. So I don't think changes are needed around here? You get -ENOENT if no entries from cdat_table_parse_output(). 
>>
> Hmmm my explanation was bad. I'm not worried about the probe, but rather 
> if -ENOENT is returned by cdat_table_parse_output() due to empty DSLBIS,
> then cxl_cdat_endpoint_process() propagates it to cxl_endpoint_parse_cdat(). It
> returns early, even though the DSMAS was valid for the DC partition and
> the DSLBIS is optional:
> 
> 	rc = cxl_cdat_endpoint_process(port, dsmas_xa);
> 	if (rc < 0) {
> 		dev_dbg(&port->dev, "Failed to parse CDAT: %d\n", rc);
> 		return; <---- skips cxl_memdev_set_qos_class, which is where we
> read the shareable attr from dsmas 
> 	}
> 
> 	rc = cxl_port_perf_data_calculate(port, dsmas_xa);
> 	if (rc) {
> 		dev_dbg(&port->dev, "Failed to do perf coord calculations.\n");
> 		return;
> 	}
> 	cxl_memdev_set_qos_class(cxlds, dsmas_xa);
> 	cxl_qos_class_verify(cxlmd);
> 	cxl_memdev_update_perf(cxlmd);
> 
> I hope that makes sense?

Yeah that makes sense now. What do you think if for the optional handlers if we don't find entries we return MAX_INT? And we just add a comment somewhere that says it means no entires but it's optional? That should reduce the amount of hack around needed right? We can just fixup cdat_table_parse_output(). 

DJ
> 
> - Anisa
> 
>> DJ
>>
>>>
>>> Something like this:
>>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
>>> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  static int cxl_cdat_endpoint_process(struct cxl_port *port,
>>> -				     struct xarray *dsmas_xa)
>>> +				     struct xarray *dsmas_xa, bool *has_dslbis)
>>>  {
>>>  	int rc;
>>>  
>>> @@ -191,9 +191,13 @@
>>>  	if (rc)
>>>  		return rc;
>>>  
>>> +	/* DSLBIS is optional; without it there is no perf data to apply */
>>>  	rc = cdat_table_parse(ACPI_CDAT_TYPE_DSLBIS, cdat_dslbis_handler,
>>>  			      dsmas_xa, port->cdat.table, port->cdat.length);
>>> -	return cdat_table_parse_output(rc);
>>> +	if (rc < 0)
>>> +		return rc;
>>> +	*has_dslbis = rc > 0;
>>> +	return 0;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  static int cxl_port_perf_data_calculate(struct cxl_port *port,
>>> @@ -430,19 +434,22 @@
>>>  	struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds = cxlmd->cxlds;
>>>  	struct xarray __dsmas_xa;
>>>  	struct xarray *dsmas_xa __free(dsmas) = &__dsmas_xa;
>>> +	bool has_dslbis = false;
>>>  	int rc;
>>>  
>>>  	xa_init(&__dsmas_xa);
>>>  	if (!port->cdat.table)
>>>  		return;
>>>  
>>> -	rc = cxl_cdat_endpoint_process(port, dsmas_xa);
>>> +	rc = cxl_cdat_endpoint_process(port, dsmas_xa, &has_dslbis);
>>>  	if (rc < 0) {
>>>  		dev_dbg(&port->dev, "Failed to parse CDAT: %d\n", rc);
>>>  		return;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> -	rc = cxl_port_perf_data_calculate(port, dsmas_xa);
>>> +	rc = -ENOENT;
>>> +	if (has_dslbis)
>>> +		rc = cxl_port_perf_data_calculate(port, dsmas_xa);
>>>  	if (rc)
>>>  		dev_dbg(&port->dev, "Failed to do perf coord calculations.\n");
>>>
>>>
>>> Would something like this work? (I am also not an expert in CDAT/DSMAS/DSLBIS)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Anisa
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Richard Cheng.
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Changes:
>>>>>> 1. cdat.c: record the DSMAS shareable flag independently of QTG
>>>>>>    discovery. cxl_port_perf_data_calculate() returns -ENOENT when FW
>>>>>>    recommends no QTG for any entry, which skipped the assignment even
>>>>>>    though the CDAT parsed successfully and the DSMAS flag was valid.
>>>>>>    Richard
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c   | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>>>>>  drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c    |  1 +
>>>>>>  drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c   |  9 +++++++
>>>>>>  drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c | 17 ++++++++------
>>>>>>  drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h      |  2 ++
>>>>>>  include/cxl/cxl.h         |  4 ++++
>>>>>>  6 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c b/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
>>>>>> index 5c9f07262513..6e7950f12134 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/cdat.c
>>>>>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ struct dsmas_entry {
>>>>>>  	struct access_coordinate cdat_coord[ACCESS_COORDINATE_MAX];
>>>>>>  	int entries;
>>>>>>  	int qos_class;
>>>>>> +	bool shareable;
>>>>>>  };
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  static u32 cdat_normalize(u16 entry, u64 base, u8 type)
>>>>>> @@ -74,6 +75,8 @@ static int cdat_dsmas_handler(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, void *arg,
>>>>>>  		return -ENOMEM;
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  	dent->handle = dsmas->dsmad_handle;
>>>>>> +	/* Shareable is CDAT 1.03 and later, DSMAS Flags bit 3 */
>>>>>> +	dent->shareable = dsmas->flags & ACPI_CDAT_DSMAS_SHAREABLE;
>>>>>>  	dent->dpa_range.start = le64_to_cpu((__force __le64)dsmas->dpa_base_address);
>>>>>>  	dent->dpa_range.end = le64_to_cpu((__force __le64)dsmas->dpa_base_address) +
>>>>>>  			      le64_to_cpu((__force __le64)dsmas->dpa_length) - 1;
>>>>>> @@ -255,8 +258,13 @@ static void update_perf_entry(struct device *dev, struct dsmas_entry *dent,
>>>>>>  		dent->coord[ACCESS_COORDINATE_CPU].write_latency);
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> -static void cxl_memdev_set_qos_class(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
>>>>>> -				     struct xarray *dsmas_xa)
>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>> + * The DSMAS shareable flag is a property of the CDAT entry and is recorded
>>>>>> + * even if FW returns no QTG recommendations for any entry; only update perf
>>>>>> + * if those recommendations exist, indicated by @set_perf
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>> +static void cxl_memdev_apply_dsmas(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
>>>>>> +				   struct xarray *dsmas_xa, bool set_perf)
>>>>>>  {
>>>>>>  	struct device *dev = cxlds->dev;
>>>>>>  	struct dsmas_entry *dent;
>>>>>> @@ -266,18 +274,34 @@ static void cxl_memdev_set_qos_class(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
>>>>>>  		bool found = false;
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  		for (int i = 0; i < cxlds->nr_partitions; i++) {
>>>>>> -			struct resource *res = &cxlds->part[i].res;
>>>>>> +			struct cxl_dpa_partition *part = &cxlds->part[i];
>>>>>>  			struct range range = {
>>>>>> -				.start = res->start,
>>>>>> -				.end = res->end,
>>>>>> +				.start = part->res.start,
>>>>>> +				.end = part->res.end,
>>>>>>  			};
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> -			if (range_contains(&range, &dent->dpa_range)) {
>>>>>> -				update_perf_entry(dev, dent,
>>>>>> -						  &cxlds->part[i].perf);
>>>>>> -				found = true;
>>>>>> +			if (!range_contains(&range, &dent->dpa_range))
>>>>>> +				continue;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +			found = true;
>>>>>> +			/*
>>>>>> +			 * part->handle is from Get DC Config, dent->handle
>>>>>> +			 * from the CDAT DSMAS entry.
>>>>>> +			 */
>>>>>> +			if (part->mode == CXL_PARTMODE_DYNAMIC_RAM_1 &&
>>>>>> +			    dent->handle != part->handle) {
>>>>>> +				dev_warn(dev,
>>>>>> +					 "DSMAD handle mismatch: %pra has %u, DSMAS %pra has %u\n",
>>>>>> +					 &range, part->handle,
>>>>>> +					 &dent->dpa_range, dent->handle);
>>>>>>  				break;
>>>>>>  			}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +			if (set_perf)
>>>>>> +				update_perf_entry(dev, dent, &part->perf);
>>>>>> +			if (part->mode == CXL_PARTMODE_DYNAMIC_RAM_1)
>>>>>> +				part->shareable = dent->shareable;
>>>>>> +			break;
>>>>>>  		}
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  		if (!found)
>>>>>> @@ -419,12 +443,13 @@ void cxl_endpoint_parse_cdat(struct cxl_port *port)
>>>>>>  	}
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  	rc = cxl_port_perf_data_calculate(port, dsmas_xa);
>>>>>> -	if (rc) {
>>>>>> +	if (rc)
>>>>>>  		dev_dbg(&port->dev, "Failed to do perf coord calculations.\n");
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	cxl_memdev_apply_dsmas(cxlds, dsmas_xa, rc == 0);
>>>>>> +	if (rc)
>>>>>>  		return;
>>>>>> -	}
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> -	cxl_memdev_set_qos_class(cxlds, dsmas_xa);
>>>>>>  	cxl_qos_class_verify(cxlmd);
>>>>>>  	cxl_memdev_update_perf(cxlmd);
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c b/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
>>>>>> index 0ef076c08ed2..7f63b86887f4 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/hdm.c
>>>>>> @@ -477,6 +477,7 @@ int cxl_dpa_setup(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, const struct cxl_dpa_info *info)
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  		cxlds->part[i].perf.qos_class = CXL_QOS_CLASS_INVALID;
>>>>>>  		cxlds->part[i].mode = part->mode;
>>>>>> +		cxlds->part[i].handle = part->handle;
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  		/* Require ordered + contiguous partitions */
>>>>>>  		if (i) {
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
>>>>>> index c96c16cc08e1..d84a90320081 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
>>>>>> @@ -1366,6 +1366,7 @@ static int cxl_dc_check(struct device *dev, struct cxl_dc_partition_info *part,
>>>>>>  	u64 decode_len = le64_to_cpu(dev_part->decode_length);
>>>>>>  	u64 blk_size = le64_to_cpu(dev_part->block_size);
>>>>>>  	u64 len = le64_to_cpu(dev_part->length);
>>>>>> +	u32 handle = le32_to_cpu(dev_part->dsmad_handle);
>>>>>>  	u64 size;
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  	/*
>>>>>> @@ -1378,6 +1379,13 @@ static int cxl_dc_check(struct device *dev, struct cxl_dc_partition_info *part,
>>>>>>  		return 0;
>>>>>>  	}
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> +	/* The CDAT DSMAD handle this refers to is 8 bits */
>>>>>> +	if (handle & ~0xFF) {
>>>>>> +		dev_warn(dev, "DSMAD handle 0x%x exceeds the 8 bit CDAT DSMAD handle\n",
>>>>>> +			 handle);
>>>>>> +		return -EINVAL;
>>>>>> +	}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>  	/*
>>>>>>  	 * Decode length is a count of 256M units, so a device reporting 2^36
>>>>>>  	 * or more wraps.
>>>>>> @@ -1391,6 +1399,7 @@ static int cxl_dc_check(struct device *dev, struct cxl_dc_partition_info *part,
>>>>>>  	*part = (struct cxl_dc_partition_info) {
>>>>>>  		.start = le64_to_cpu(dev_part->base),
>>>>>>  		.size = size,
>>>>>> +		.handle = handle,
>>>>>>  	};
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  	/*
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
>>>>>> index 15df8db314d9..8883c8850759 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c
>>>>>> @@ -594,7 +594,8 @@ bool is_cxl_memdev(const struct device *dev)
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(is_cxl_memdev, "CXL");
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> -static void add_part(struct cxl_dpa_info *info, u64 start, u64 size, enum cxl_partition_mode mode)
>>>>>> +static void add_part(struct cxl_dpa_info *info, u64 start, u64 size,
>>>>>> +		     enum cxl_partition_mode mode, u8 handle)
>>>>>>  {
>>>>>>  	int i = info->nr_partitions;
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> @@ -606,6 +607,7 @@ static void add_part(struct cxl_dpa_info *info, u64 start, u64 size, enum cxl_pa
>>>>>>  		.end = start + size - 1,
>>>>>>  	};
>>>>>>  	info->part[i].mode = mode;
>>>>>> +	info->part[i].handle = handle;
>>>>>>  	info->nr_partitions++;
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> @@ -623,9 +625,9 @@ int cxl_mem_dpa_fetch(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds, struct cxl_dpa_info *info)
>>>>>>  	info->size = mds->total_bytes;
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  	if (mds->partition_align_bytes == 0) {
>>>>>> -		add_part(info, 0, mds->volatile_only_bytes, CXL_PARTMODE_RAM);
>>>>>> +		add_part(info, 0, mds->volatile_only_bytes, CXL_PARTMODE_RAM, 0);
>>>>>>  		add_part(info, mds->volatile_only_bytes,
>>>>>> -			 mds->persistent_only_bytes, CXL_PARTMODE_PMEM);
>>>>>> +			 mds->persistent_only_bytes, CXL_PARTMODE_PMEM, 0);
>>>>>>  		return 0;
>>>>>>  	}
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> @@ -635,9 +637,9 @@ int cxl_mem_dpa_fetch(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds, struct cxl_dpa_info *info)
>>>>>>  		return rc;
>>>>>>  	}
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> -	add_part(info, 0, mds->active_volatile_bytes, CXL_PARTMODE_RAM);
>>>>>> +	add_part(info, 0, mds->active_volatile_bytes, CXL_PARTMODE_RAM, 0);
>>>>>>  	add_part(info, mds->active_volatile_bytes, mds->active_persistent_bytes,
>>>>>> -		 CXL_PARTMODE_PMEM);
>>>>>> +		 CXL_PARTMODE_PMEM, 0);
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  	return 0;
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>> @@ -685,7 +687,8 @@ int cxl_configure_dcd(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds, struct cxl_dpa_info *info)
>>>>>>  	info->size = total;
>>>>>>  	dev_dbg(dev, "Adding dynamic ram partition 1; %#llx size %#llx\n",
>>>>>>  		dc_info.start, dc_info.size);
>>>>>> -	add_part(info, dc_info.start, dc_info.size, CXL_PARTMODE_DYNAMIC_RAM_1);
>>>>>> +	add_part(info, dc_info.start, dc_info.size, CXL_PARTMODE_DYNAMIC_RAM_1,
>>>>>> +		 dc_info.handle);
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  	return 0;
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>> @@ -704,7 +707,7 @@ int cxl_set_capacity(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, u64 capacity)
>>>>>>  		.size = capacity,
>>>>>>  	};
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> -	add_part(&range_info, 0, capacity, CXL_PARTMODE_RAM);
>>>>>> +	add_part(&range_info, 0, capacity, CXL_PARTMODE_RAM, 0);
>>>>>>  	return cxl_dpa_setup(cxlds, &range_info);
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_set_capacity, "CXL");
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
>>>>>> index 4fac65dbb808..9fd5af2e41d4 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
>>>>>> @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ struct cxl_dpa_info {
>>>>>>  	struct cxl_dpa_part_info {
>>>>>>  		struct range range;
>>>>>>  		enum cxl_partition_mode mode;
>>>>>> +		u8 handle;
>>>>>>  	} part[CXL_NR_PARTITIONS_MAX];
>>>>>>  	int nr_partitions;
>>>>>>  };
>>>>>> @@ -851,6 +852,7 @@ int cxl_dev_state_identify(struct cxl_memdev_state *mds);
>>>>>>  struct cxl_dc_partition_info {
>>>>>>  	u64 start;
>>>>>>  	u64 size;
>>>>>> +	u8 handle;
>>>>>>  };
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  int cxl_dev_dc_identify(struct cxl_mailbox *mbox,
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/cxl/cxl.h b/include/cxl/cxl.h
>>>>>> index 4ef9511fbbdd..43edcde5bce3 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/cxl/cxl.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/cxl/cxl.h
>>>>>> @@ -141,11 +141,15 @@ enum cxl_partition_mode {
>>>>>>   * @res: shortcut to the partition in the DPA resource tree (cxlds->dpa_res)
>>>>>>   * @perf: performance attributes of the partition from CDAT
>>>>>>   * @mode: operation mode for the DPA capacity, e.g. ram, pmem, dynamic...
>>>>>> + * @handle: DSMAS handle that represents this partition
>>>>>> + * @shareable: Is the partition shareable (from its CDAT DSMAS entry)
>>>>>>   */
>>>>>>  struct cxl_dpa_partition {
>>>>>>  	struct resource res;
>>>>>>  	struct cxl_dpa_perf perf;
>>>>>>  	enum cxl_partition_mode mode;
>>>>>> +	u8 handle;
>>>>>> +	bool shareable;
>>>>>>  };
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  #define CXL_NR_PARTITIONS_MAX 3
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> 2.43.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-23 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-18 20:30 [PATCH v14 0/8] DCD Prep Series Anisa Su
2026-09-18 20:30 ` [PATCH v14 1/8] cxl/mbox: Flag support for Dynamic Capacity Devices (DCD) Anisa Su
2026-09-18 20:30 ` [PATCH v14 2/8] cxl/mem: Read dynamic capacity configuration from the device Anisa Su
2026-09-18 20:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 22:59     ` Anisa Su
2026-09-21 21:50   ` Dave Jiang
2026-09-21 23:19   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-22  3:44   ` Richard Cheng
2026-09-24  0:55     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-24  7:01       ` Anisa Su
2026-09-18 20:30 ` [PATCH v14 3/8] cxl/cdat: Gather DSMAS data for DCD partitions Anisa Su
2026-09-21 21:55   ` Dave Jiang
2026-09-24  5:12     ` Anisa Su
2026-09-21 23:27   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-24  5:01     ` Anisa Su
2026-09-22  3:53   ` Richard Cheng
2026-09-22 17:08     ` Dave Jiang
2026-09-22 21:15       ` Anisa Su
2026-09-22 23:05         ` Dave Jiang
2026-09-23  0:05           ` Anisa Su
2026-09-23 15:35             ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2026-09-24  4:58               ` Anisa Su
2026-09-18 20:30 ` [PATCH v14 4/8] cxl/events: Split event msgnum configuration from irq setup Anisa Su
2026-09-22  5:35   ` Richard Cheng
2026-09-18 20:30 ` [PATCH v14 5/8] cxl/pci: Factor out interrupt policy check Anisa Su
2026-09-22  5:37   ` Richard Cheng
2026-09-18 20:30 ` [PATCH v14 6/8] cxl/mem: Configure dynamic capacity interrupts Anisa Su
2026-09-18 20:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-18 23:38     ` Anisa Su
2026-09-21 22:00   ` Dave Jiang
2026-09-21 23:42     ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-22  0:45       ` Dave Jiang
2026-09-22 21:22         ` Anisa Su
2026-09-24  0:58           ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-22  5:48   ` Richard Cheng
2026-09-22  9:15     ` Richard Cheng
2026-09-18 20:30 ` [PATCH v14 7/8] cxl/core: Enforce partition order/simplify partition calls Anisa Su
2026-09-18 20:30 ` [PATCH v14 8/8] Documentation/cxl: Document DPA partition layout and ordering rules Anisa Su
2026-09-21 22:02   ` Dave Jiang
2026-09-28 21:53     ` Anisa Su
2026-09-28 22:36       ` Dave Jiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4a5d67c0-baf7-4b70-a8e9-47dc555d8264@intel.com \
    --to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=anisa.su887@gmail.com \
    --cc=benjamin.cheatham@amd.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=habil.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=icheng@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iweiny@kernel.org \
    --cc=jh9934.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
    --cc=wj28.lee@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox