From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/22] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco-evk-ifp-mezzanine: Fix the PCIe iommu-map entries
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 12:09:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260730120943.23CA01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730-iommu-map-fix-v1-17-83405d37ba41@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Medium] The fix for 4-cell `iommu-map` entries is incomplete across the tree. Identical incorrect entries targeting IOMMUs with `#iommu-cells = <2>` remain in other related device trees (e.g., `lemans-evk-ifp-mezzanine.dtso` and `qcs6490-*.dts`).
--
--- Patch [17]: [PATCH 17/22] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco-evk-ifp-mezzanine: Fix the PCIe iommu-map entries ---
commit 24efdfda849da979474e77045094935d85b3ae7b
Author: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
arm64: dts: qcom: monaco-evk-ifp-mezzanine: Fix the PCIe iommu-map entries
This commit fixes the iommu-map entries for the pcie0 node in the
monaco-evk-ifp-mezzanine device tree. It adds the missing SID mask cell to
each entry to match the 2-cell requirement of the pcie_smmu provider,
resolving a warning from the OF core during boot.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco-evk-ifp-mezzanine.dtso b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco-evk-ifp-mezzanine.dtso
> index e6beb4393430b..a6e57ec8a1e14 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco-evk-ifp-mezzanine.dtso
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/monaco-evk-ifp-mezzanine.dtso
> @@ -50,15 +50,15 @@ nvmem-layout {
> };
>
> &pcie0 {
> - iommu-map = <0x0 &pcie_smmu 0x0 0x1>,
> - <0x100 &pcie_smmu 0x1 0x1>,
[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but this fix appears to be incomplete across
the tree.
Identical 4-cell iommu-map entries targeting 2-cell #iommu-cells providers
remain in other related device trees, such as:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans-evk-ifp-mezzanine.dtso in pcie0:
iommu-map = <0x0 &pcie_smmu 0x0 0x1>,
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs6490-rb3gen2.dts in pcie1:
iommu-map = <0x0 &apps_smmu 0x1c80 0x1>,
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs6490-radxa-dragon-q6a.dts in pcie1:
iommu-map = <0x0 &apps_smmu 0x1c80 0x1>,
These will likely trigger the same OF core warning mentioned in the commit
message. Should these other files be updated in this patch or a follow-up
series?
> - <0x208 &pcie_smmu 0x2 0x1>,
> - <0x210 &pcie_smmu 0x3 0x1>,
> - <0x218 &pcie_smmu 0x4 0x1>,
> - <0x300 &pcie_smmu 0x5 0x1>,
> - <0x400 &pcie_smmu 0x6 0x1>,
> - <0x500 &pcie_smmu 0x7 0x1>,
> - <0x501 &pcie_smmu 0x8 0x1>;
> + iommu-map = <0x0 &pcie_smmu 0x0 0x0 0x1>,
> + <0x100 &pcie_smmu 0x1 0x0 0x1>,
> + <0x208 &pcie_smmu 0x2 0x0 0x1>,
> + <0x210 &pcie_smmu 0x3 0x0 0x1>,
> + <0x218 &pcie_smmu 0x4 0x0 0x1>,
> + <0x300 &pcie_smmu 0x5 0x0 0x1>,
> + <0x400 &pcie_smmu 0x6 0x0 0x1>,
> + <0x500 &pcie_smmu 0x7 0x0 0x1>,
> + <0x501 &pcie_smmu 0x8 0x0 0x1>;
> };
>
> &pcieport0 {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260730-iommu-map-fix-v1-0-83405d37ba41@oss.qualcomm.com?part=17
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 11:55 [PATCH 00/22] arm64: dts: qcom: Fix the PCIe iommu-map entries Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 01/22] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 02/22] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 12:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 03/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sar2130p: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 04/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8180x: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 12:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 05/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 06/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 07/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 12:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 08/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 09/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 12:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 10/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 13:39 ` Neil Armstrong
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 11/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 13:39 ` Neil Armstrong
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 12/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 13/22] arm64: dts: qcom: talos: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 12:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 14/22] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 15/22] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 12:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 16/22] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco-monza-som: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 17/22] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco-evk-ifp-mezzanine: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 12:09 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 18/22] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans-evk-ifp-mezzanine: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:56 ` [PATCH 19/22] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-radxa-dragon-q6a: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:56 ` [PATCH 20/22] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-thundercomm-minipc-g1iot: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 12:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:56 ` [PATCH 21/22] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-rb3gen2: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 12:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:56 ` [PATCH 22/22] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-rb3gen2-industrial-mezzanine: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 12:23 ` [PATCH 00/22] arm64: dts: qcom: " Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-07-30 12:46 ` Konrad Dybcio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260730120943.23CA01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox