From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sven Peter" <sven@kernel.org>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/19] thunderbolt: Try reading host DROM from device tree first
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 20:33:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830203349.B1F701F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260830-b4-apple-soc-tbt-v1-6-44bc9348683c@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Integer underflow in `tb_drom_parse_entry_generic` allows an attacker-controlled Device Tree or DROM to trigger an unbounded kernel memory read.
- [High] Inadequate buffer allocation size in DROM copy paths allows out-of-bounds reads during header parsing, leading to a heap information leak.
--
commit 579084ce1fd77c747852aa3d8eca1094e3c9a9c1
Author: Sven Peter <sven@kernel.org>
thunderbolt: Try reading host DROM from device tree first
On Apple Silicon SoCs the DROM is provided by a device tree property.
This commit updates the subsystem to try reading from that property first
before falling back to other methods.
> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/eeprom.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/eeprom.c
> index 2a13fa6888ba1..389de7df84f65 100644
> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/eeprom.c
> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/eeprom.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -500,6 +499,22 @@ static int tb_drom_copy_efi(struct tb_switch *sw, u16 *size)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * tb_drom_copy_of_apple - copy drom supplied by the device tree for Apple Silicon to sw->drom.
> + */
> +static int tb_drom_copy_of_apple(struct tb_switch *sw, u16 *size)
> +{
> + return tb_drom_copy_property(sw, "apple,thunderbolt-drom", size);
> +}
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this logic leave us vulnerable to an
unbounded kernel memory read if an attacker-controlled Device Tree or malicious
Thunderbolt device provides a crafted DROM?
In drivers/thunderbolt/eeprom.c:tb_drom_parse_entries(), the validation
incorrectly permits an entry with length 1 to bypass the length checks:
if (pos + 1 == drom_size || pos + entry->len > drom_size
|| !entry->len) {
tb_sw_warn(sw, "DROM buffer overrun\n");
If entry->len is 1, pos + 1 > drom_size evaluates to false, proceeding to
parsing. In tb_drom_parse_entry_generic(), this causes an integer underflow:
case 1:
/* Length includes 2 bytes header so remove it before copy */
sw->vendor_name = kstrndup(entry->data,
header->len - sizeof(*header), GFP_KERNEL);
Since sizeof(*header) is 2, header->len - sizeof(*header) evaluates to
1 - 2 = -1, which is promoted to SIZE_MAX in kstrndup().
Could this cause an immediate kernel panic when strnlen() hits an unmapped
page?
> +
> +/*
> + * tb_drom_copy_efi - copy drom supplied by EFI to sw->drom if present
> + */
> +static int tb_drom_copy_efi(struct tb_switch *sw, u16 *size)
> +{
> + return tb_drom_copy_property(sw, "ThunderboltDROM", size);
> +}
> +
> static int tb_drom_copy_nvm(struct tb_switch *sw, u16 *size)
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the DROM copy path allocate
an undersized buffer that could lead to a heap information leak?
When reading DROM, drivers/thunderbolt/eeprom.c:tb_drom_copy_nvm() (and
similarly usb4_copy_drom()) calculates the size based on a potentially small
DROM data length:
/* Size includes CRC8 + UID + CRC32 */
*size += 1 + 8 + 4;
ret = tb_switch_drom_alloc(sw, *size);
If the data_len is between 0 and 8 (for example, 3), it allocates an undersized
buffer of 16 bytes, which is smaller than sizeof(struct tb_drom_header), which
is 22 bytes.
Later, tb_drom_parse() performs an out-of-bounds read on the undersized buffer
at byte 13:
tb_sw_dbg(sw, "DROM version: %d\n", header->device_rom_revision);
Additionally, tb_drom_parse_v1() performs out-of-bounds reads at byte offsets
16-19:
sw->vendor = header->vendor_id;
Could this reliably leak 4 bytes of adjacent heap memory from kmalloc-16 to
userspace via sysfs when sw->vendor and sw->device are exposed?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260830-b4-apple-soc-tbt-v1-0-44bc9348683c@kernel.org?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-30 20:19 [PATCH 00/19] Initial USB4/Thunderbolt support for Apple M1/M2/M3 SoCs Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 01/19] dt-bindings: usb: Add thunderbolt-switch property Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 02/19] usb: typec: Add thunderbolt switch Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 11:17 ` Heikki Krogerus
2026-09-01 18:53 ` Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 03/19] usb: typec: tipd: Hook up Thunderbolt switch for CD321x Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 04/19] dt-bindings: thunderbolt: Add Apple USB4/Thunderbolt NHI Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 05/19] dt-bindings: thunderbolt: Add Apple USB4/Thunderbolt ACIO block Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 06/19] thunderbolt: Try reading host DROM from device tree first Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-01 8:48 ` Mika Westerberg
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 07/19] thunderbolt: Don't read the UID if we already know it Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 08/19] thunderbolt: Allocate ring HopID before requesting the ring interrupt Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 09/19] thunderbolt: Add ring_interrupt_active to tb_nhi_ops Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 10/19] thunderbolt: Make the ring register layout configurable Sven Peter
2026-09-01 8:58 ` Mika Westerberg
2026-09-01 18:56 ` Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 11/19] thunderbolt: Add ring_interrupt_mask to tb_nhi_ops Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 12/19] thunderbolt: Add ring_configure " Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 13/19] thunderbolt: Add QUIRK_NO_DMA_PORT Sven Peter
2026-09-01 9:04 ` Mika Westerberg
2026-09-01 17:06 ` Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 14/19] thunderbolt: Add QUIRK_NO_USB3_BW_ALLOC Sven Peter
2026-09-01 9:12 ` Mika Westerberg
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 15/19] thunderbolt: Export symbols required by the Apple Silicon driver Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 16/19] thunderbolt: Add Apple Silicon support Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-01 10:09 ` Mika Westerberg
2026-09-01 19:06 ` Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 17/19] arm64: dts: apple: t8103: Add USB4 ACIO and NHI Sven Peter
2026-09-01 10:20 ` Mika Westerberg
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 18/19] arm64: dts: apple: t8112: " Sven Peter
2026-08-30 20:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 20:19 ` [PATCH 19/19] arm64: dts: apple: t60xx: " Sven Peter
2026-08-31 17:44 ` [PATCH 00/19] Initial USB4/Thunderbolt support for Apple M1/M2/M3 SoCs Joshua Peisach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260830203349.B1F701F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sven@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox