From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
iii@linux.ibm.com, corbet@lwn.net, tglx@kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
seanjc@google.com, vschneid@redhat.com, huschle@linux.ibm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
maddy@linux.ibm.com, srikar@linux.ibm.com, hdanton@sina.com,
chleroy@kernel.org, vineeth@bitbyteword.org, frederic@kernel.org,
arighi@nvidia.com, pauld@redhat.com, christian.loehle@arm.com,
tj@kernel.org, tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org,
rafael@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, kernellwp@gmail.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/24] sched/core: allow only preferred CPUs in is_cpu_allowed
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2026 00:13:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ace8847-db42-49a8-8d0f-6eeead1c360f@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a223931-5172-4ed5-a9f8-c2b316a0f6cc@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Yury.
On 6/26/26 6:55 PM, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> Hi Yury. Thanks for going through the patches.
>
[...]
>> So, you've got 3 options to declare the status: self-explaining enum,
>> self-explaining #defines, and this random numbers explained in
>> comment. The latter option is the worst to me.
>
> ok. I will define the enums.
>
>>
>> And you didn't provide any benchmark advocating this caching
>> optimization.
I did below to see. Made interval as 100ms.
Ran ./hackbench 30 process 30000 loops in both the VM at the same time.
Values are average of 5 runs.
With optimization:
13.6 seconds
Without optimization:
13.8 seconds
>>
>> Sorry, but NAK.
>>
>
> If we move to local variable then this won;t be necessary,
> just enum's would be enough (I think). Let me go stare at it.
I have made it use the local variable instead. There maybe better names
for variable, put something quickly to check the idea.
Effectively this PATCH 6 becomes:
Does this seems better?
Please let me know your comments.
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 9e16946c9d62..fafedd52611f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2498,8 +2498,10 @@ static inline bool rq_has_pinned_tasks(struct rq *rq)
* Per-CPU kthreads are allowed to run on !active && online CPUs, see
* __set_cpus_allowed_ptr() and select_fallback_rq().
*/
-static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
+static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int cached)
{
+ bool task_check_preferred_cpu;
+
/* When not in the task's cpumask, no point in looking further. */
if (!task_allowed_on_cpu(p, cpu))
return false;
@@ -2508,9 +2510,24 @@ static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
if (is_migration_disabled(p))
return cpu_online(cpu);
+ /*
+ * This is essential to maintain user affinities when preferred
+ * CPUs change. A task pinned on non-preferred CPU should continue
+ * to run there, since this is non-user triggered.
+ *
+ * If CPU is non-preferred and task can run on other CPUs which are
+ * currently preferred, then choose those other CPUs instead.
+ * Overhead is minimal when CPU is preferred.
+ */
+ task_check_preferred_cpu = !cpu_preferred(cpu) &&
+ task_has_preferred_cpus(p, cached);
+
/* Non kernel threads are not allowed during either online or offline. */
- if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+ if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
+ if (task_check_preferred_cpu)
+ return false;
return cpu_active(cpu);
+ }
/* KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU is always allowed. */
if (kthread_is_per_cpu(p))
@@ -2520,6 +2537,10 @@ static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
if (cpu_dying(cpu))
return false;
+ /* Try on preferred CPU first if possible*/
+ if (task_check_preferred_cpu)
+ return false;
+
/* But are allowed during online. */
return cpu_online(cpu);
}
@@ -2595,7 +2616,7 @@ static struct rq *__migrate_task(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf,
__must_hold(__rq_lockp(rq))
{
/* Affinity changed (again). */
- if (!is_cpu_allowed(p, dest_cpu))
+ if (!is_cpu_allowed(p, dest_cpu, NO_CACHED_VAL))
return rq;
rq = move_queued_task(rq, rf, p, dest_cpu);
@@ -3547,7 +3568,15 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
int nid = cpu_to_node(cpu);
const struct cpumask *nodemask = NULL;
enum { cpuset, possible, fail } state = cpuset;
- int dest_cpu;
+ int dest_cpu, has_preferred_cpu;
+
+ /*
+ * Cache the value whether task's affinity spans preferred CPUs.
+ * This helps to avoid repeating the same for each CPU
+ * later in the loop.
+ */
+ has_preferred_cpu = task_has_preferred_cpus(p, NO_CACHED_VAL) ?
+ TASK_HAS_PREFERRED_CPUS : TASK_NO_PREFERRED_CPUS;
/*
* If the node that the CPU is on has been offlined, cpu_to_node()
@@ -3559,7 +3588,7 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
/* Look for allowed, online CPU in same node. */
for_each_cpu(dest_cpu, nodemask) {
- if (is_cpu_allowed(p, dest_cpu))
+ if (is_cpu_allowed(p, dest_cpu, has_preferred_cpu))
return dest_cpu;
}
}
@@ -3567,7 +3596,7 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
for (;;) {
/* Any allowed, online CPU? */
for_each_cpu(dest_cpu, p->cpus_ptr) {
- if (!is_cpu_allowed(p, dest_cpu))
+ if (!is_cpu_allowed(p, dest_cpu, has_preferred_cpu))
continue;
goto out;
@@ -3632,7 +3661,7 @@ int select_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int *wake_flags)
* [ this allows ->select_task() to simply return task_cpu(p) and
* not worry about this generic constraint ]
*/
- if (unlikely(!is_cpu_allowed(p, cpu)))
+ if (unlikely(!is_cpu_allowed(p, cpu, NO_CACHED_VAL)))
cpu = select_fallback_rq(task_cpu(p), p);
return cpu;
@@ -6467,7 +6496,7 @@ static bool try_steal_cookie(int this, int that)
if (p == src->core_pick || p == src->curr)
goto next;
- if (!is_cpu_allowed(p, this))
+ if (!is_cpu_allowed(p, this, NO_CACHED_VAL))
goto next;
if (p->core_occupation > dst->idle->core_occupation)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index c7c2dea65edd..949c044702c1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -4213,4 +4213,32 @@ DEFINE_CLASS_IS_UNCONDITIONAL(sched_change)
#include "ext.h"
+enum task_preferred_cached {
+ TASK_NO_PREFERRED_CPUS = -1,
+ NO_CACHED_VAL,
+ TASK_HAS_PREFERRED_CPUS,
+};
+
+/*
+ * Value is cached when called via select_fallback_rq().
+ *
+ * TASK_NO_PREFERRED_CPUS : Cached and preferred CPUs exists in task's
+ * affinity.
+ * NO_CACHED_VAL: Not cached and need to evaluate.
+ * TASK_HAS_PREFERRED_CPUS: Cached and preferred CPU doesn't exits
+ * task's affinity
+ *
+ * Only affects FAIR task.
+ */
+static inline bool task_has_preferred_cpus(struct task_struct *p, int cached)
+{
+ /* Only FAIR tasks honor preferred CPU state */
+ if (unlikely(p->sched_class != &fair_sched_class))
+ return false;
+
+ if (cached)
+ return cached > 0;
+ else
+ return cpumask_intersects(p->cpus_ptr, cpu_preferred_mask);
+}
#endif /* _KERNEL_SCHED_SCHED_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-25 12:46 [PATCH v5 00/24] sched: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 01/24] sched/debug: Remove unused schedstats Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 02/24] sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 03/24] kconfig: Provide PREFERRED_CPU option Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 04/24] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26 13:37 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26 9:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26 13:09 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26 13:18 ` Yury Norov
2026-06-26 13:27 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26 12:40 ` Yury Norov
2026-06-26 13:18 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26 18:51 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 05/24] sysfs: Add preferred CPU file Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 06/24] sched/core: allow only preferred CPUs in is_cpu_allowed Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26 13:06 ` Yury Norov
2026-06-26 13:25 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26 18:43 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 07/24] sched/fair: Select preferred CPU at wakeup when possible Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26 13:17 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 08/24] sched/fair: load balance only among preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 09/24] sched/fair: Pull the load on preferred CPU Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26 10:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26 13:35 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 10/24] sched/core: Keep tick on non-preferred CPUs until tasks are out Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 11/24] sched/core: Push current task from non preferred CPU Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 12/24] sched/debug: Add migration stats due to non preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 13/24] virt/steal_monitor: Add documentation Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 17:00 ` Randy Dunlap
2026-06-26 4:30 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26 9:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26 14:05 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 14/24] virt: Introduce steal monitor driver Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 15/24] virt/steal_monitor: Restore to active on module disable Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 16/24] virt/steal_monitor: Define steal_monitor structure Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 17/24] virt/steal_monitor: Add control knobs for handling steal values Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 18/24] virt/steal_monitor: Compute work at regular intervals Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 19/24] virt/steal_monitor: Provide default method to get systemwide steal time Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 20/24] virt/steal_monitor: Provide default method to inc/dec preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 21/24] virt/steal_monitor: Provide default method to get num of CPUs for steal ratio Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 22/24] virt/steal_monitor: Act on steal values at regular intervals Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 23/24] virt/steal_monitor: Add direction control Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 24/24] virt/steal_monitor: Add design check of preferred subset of active Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ace8847-db42-49a8-8d0f-6eeead1c360f@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox