Linux Documentation
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, yury.norov@gmail.com,
	kprateek.nayak@amd.com, iii@linux.ibm.com, corbet@lwn.net,
	tglx@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	seanjc@google.com, vschneid@redhat.com, huschle@linux.ibm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	maddy@linux.ibm.com, srikar@linux.ibm.com, hdanton@sina.com,
	chleroy@kernel.org, vineeth@bitbyteword.org, frederic@kernel.org,
	arighi@nvidia.com, pauld@redhat.com, christian.loehle@arm.com,
	tj@kernel.org, tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org,
	rafael@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, kernellwp@gmail.com,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/24] sched/core: allow only preferred CPUs in is_cpu_allowed
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:06:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aj55TIWls4HKYj5b@yury> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260625124648.802832-7-sshegde@linux.ibm.com>

On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 06:16:30PM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> When possible, choose a preferred CPUs to pick.
> 
> Push task mechanism uses stopper thread which going to call
> select_fallback_rq and use this mechanism to pick only a preferred CPU.
> 
> When task is affined only to non-preferred CPUs it should continue to
> run there. Detect that by checking if cpus_ptr and cpu_preferred_mask
> intersect or not.
> 
> Since is_cpu_allowed can be called directly or repeatedly in
> select_fallback_rq, encode the info in task_struct->has_preferred_cpu_state
> if the path is via select_fallback_rq or not.
> This helps to avoid N**2 complexity for the rare cases.
> 
> Additional overhead of O(N) comes to is_cpu_allowed only when cpu is not
> preferred. So in normal scenarios overhead is only a bit check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> v4->v5:
> - Do simple encoding of -1,0,1 instead (K Prateek Nayak)
> - Make it s8 (K Prateek Nayak)
> - Update changelog to address sashiko concerns of overhead.
> 
>  include/linux/sched.h |  1 +
>  kernel/sched/core.c   | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  kernel/sched/sched.h  | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index fc6ecb3869dd..27dbf676113e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1657,6 +1657,7 @@ struct task_struct {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_UNWIND_USER
>  	struct unwind_task_info		unwind_info;
>  #endif
> +	s8				has_preferred_cpu_state;

Why not protected with the config?

It looks like you didn't ever ran pahole on it. Maybe it's worth to
try now?

>  	/* CPU-specific state of this task: */
>  	struct thread_struct		thread;
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 9e16946c9d62..281715a6e88f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -2500,6 +2500,8 @@ static inline bool rq_has_pinned_tasks(struct rq *rq)
>   */
>  static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
>  {
> +	bool task_check_preferred_cpu;
> +
>  	/* When not in the task's cpumask, no point in looking further. */
>  	if (!task_allowed_on_cpu(p, cpu))
>  		return false;
> @@ -2508,9 +2510,23 @@ static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
>  	if (is_migration_disabled(p))
>  		return cpu_online(cpu);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * This is essential to maintain user affinities when preferred
> +	 * CPUs change. A task pinned on non-preferred CPU should continue
> +	 * to run there, since this is non-user triggered.
> +	 *
> +	 * If CPU is non-preferred and task can run on other CPUs which are
> +	 * currently preferred, then choose those other CPUs instead.
> +	 * Overhead is minimal when CPU is preferred.
> +	 */
> +	task_check_preferred_cpu = !cpu_preferred(cpu) && task_has_preferred_cpus(p);
> +
>  	/* Non kernel threads are not allowed during either online or offline. */
> -	if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
> +	if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
> +		if (task_check_preferred_cpu)
> +			return false;
>  		return cpu_active(cpu);
> +	}
>  
>  	/* KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU is always allowed. */
>  	if (kthread_is_per_cpu(p))
> @@ -2520,6 +2536,10 @@ static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
>  	if (cpu_dying(cpu))
>  		return false;
>  
> +	/* Try on preferred CPU first if possible*/
> +	if (task_check_preferred_cpu)
> +		return false;
> +
>  	/* But are allowed during online. */
>  	return cpu_online(cpu);
>  }
> @@ -3549,6 +3569,14 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
>  	enum { cpuset, possible, fail } state = cpuset;
>  	int dest_cpu;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Cache the value whether task's affinity spans preferred CPUs.
> +	 * This helps to avoid repeating the same for each CPU
> +	 * later in the loop. Encode call to is_cpu_allowed coming
> +	 * via select_fallback_rq.
> +	 */
> +	p->has_preferred_cpu_state = task_has_preferred_cpus(p) ? 1 : -1;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If the node that the CPU is on has been offlined, cpu_to_node()
>  	 * will return -1. There is no CPU on the node, and we should
> @@ -3560,7 +3588,7 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
>  		/* Look for allowed, online CPU in same node. */
>  		for_each_cpu(dest_cpu, nodemask) {
>  			if (is_cpu_allowed(p, dest_cpu))
> -				return dest_cpu;
> +				goto clear_and_return;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -3604,6 +3632,8 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +clear_and_return:
> +	p->has_preferred_cpu_state = 0;

Sadly, you've ignored my comments from the previous round. Let me repeat
it once again:

This ->has_preferred_cpu_state is always zero out of the scope of the
function. It means, it's a local variable, and should not belong to
the task_struct.

>  	return dest_cpu;
>  }
>  
> @@ -4612,6 +4642,7 @@ static void __sched_fork(u64 clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
>  	init_numa_balancing(clone_flags, p);
>  	p->wake_entry.u_flags = CSD_TYPE_TTWU;
>  	p->migration_pending = NULL;
> +	p->has_preferred_cpu_state = 0;
>  	init_sched_mm(p);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index c7c2dea65edd..5d009c2529b2 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -4213,4 +4213,29 @@ DEFINE_CLASS_IS_UNCONDITIONAL(sched_change)
>  
>  #include "ext.h"
>  
> +/*
> + * has_preferred_cpu_state could have the value cached from
> + * select_fallback_rq. It is set/cleared while holding pi_lock
> + * and irq disabled.
> + *
> + *  1: Cached and preferred CPUs exists in task's affinity.
> + *  0: Not cached and need to evaluate.
> + * -1: Cached and preferred CPU doesn't exits task's affinity

So, you've got 3 options to declare the status: self-explaining enum,
self-explaining #defines, and this random numbers explained in
comment. The latter option is the worst to me.

And you didn't provide any benchmark advocating this caching
optimization.

Sorry, but NAK.

> + *
> + * Only affects FAIR task.
> + */
> +static inline bool task_has_preferred_cpus(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +	int cached;
> +
> +	/* Only FAIR tasks honor preferred CPU state */
> +	if (unlikely(p->sched_class != &fair_sched_class))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	cached = READ_ONCE(p->has_preferred_cpu_state);
> +	if (cached)
> +		return cached > 0;
> +	else
> +		return cpumask_intersects(p->cpus_ptr, cpu_preferred_mask);
> +}
>  #endif /* _KERNEL_SCHED_SCHED_H */
> -- 
> 2.47.3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-26 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-25 12:46 [PATCH v5 00/24] sched: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 01/24] sched/debug: Remove unused schedstats Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 02/24] sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 03/24] kconfig: Provide PREFERRED_CPU option Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 04/24] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26  9:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26 13:37     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26  9:39   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26  9:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26 13:09       ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26 13:18         ` Yury Norov
2026-06-26 13:27           ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26 12:40     ` Yury Norov
2026-06-26 13:18       ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 05/24] sysfs: Add preferred CPU file Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 06/24] sched/core: allow only preferred CPUs in is_cpu_allowed Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26 13:06   ` Yury Norov [this message]
2026-06-26 13:25     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 07/24] sched/fair: Select preferred CPU at wakeup when possible Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26  9:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26 13:17     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 08/24] sched/fair: load balance only among preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 09/24] sched/fair: Pull the load on preferred CPU Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26 10:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26 13:35     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 10/24] sched/core: Keep tick on non-preferred CPUs until tasks are out Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 11/24] sched/core: Push current task from non preferred CPU Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 12/24] sched/debug: Add migration stats due to non preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 13/24] virt/steal_monitor: Add documentation Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 17:00   ` Randy Dunlap
2026-06-26  4:30     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-26  9:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-26 14:05     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 14/24] virt: Introduce steal monitor driver Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 15/24] virt/steal_monitor: Restore to active on module disable Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 16/24] virt/steal_monitor: Define steal_monitor structure Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 17/24] virt/steal_monitor: Add control knobs for handling steal values Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 18/24] virt/steal_monitor: Compute work at regular intervals Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 19/24] virt/steal_monitor: Provide default method to get systemwide steal time Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 20/24] virt/steal_monitor: Provide default method to inc/dec preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 21/24] virt/steal_monitor: Provide default method to get num of CPUs for steal ratio Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 22/24] virt/steal_monitor: Act on steal values at regular intervals Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 23/24] virt/steal_monitor: Add direction control Shrikanth Hegde
2026-06-25 12:46 ` [PATCH v5 24/24] virt/steal_monitor: Add design check of preferred subset of active Shrikanth Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aj55TIWls4HKYj5b@yury \
    --to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox