From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
To: <x86@kernel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com>,
Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 03/17] x86/mce/amd: Remove smca_banks_map
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:54:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250415-wip-mca-updates-v3-3-8ffd9eb4aa56@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250415-wip-mca-updates-v3-0-8ffd9eb4aa56@amd.com>
The MCx_MISC0[BlkPtr] field was used on legacy systems to hold a
register offset for the next MCx_MISC* register. In this way, an
implementation-specific number of registers can be discovered at
runtime.
The MCAX/SMCA register space simplifies this by always including
the MCx_MISC[1-4] registers. The MCx_MISC0[BlkPtr] field is used to
indicate (true/false) whether any MCx_MISC[1-4] registers are present.
But it indicates neither which ones nor how many. Therefore, all the
registers are accessed and their bits are checked.
AMD systems generally enforce a Read-as-Zero/Writes-Ignored policy for
unused registers. Therefore, there is no harm to read an unused
register. This is already done in practice for most of the MCx_MISC
registers.
Remove the smca_banks_map variable as it is effectively redundant.
Reviewed-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
---
Notes:
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250213-wip-mca-updates-v2-3-3636547fe05f@amd.com
v2->v3:
* Minor edit in commit message.
* Added tags from Qiuxu and Tony.
v1->v2:
* New in v2.
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c | 30 ------------------------------
1 file changed, 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
index 7ff479c679fb..46ff41c1b50d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
@@ -252,9 +252,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct threshold_bank **, threshold_banks);
*/
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, bank_map);
-/* Map of banks that have more than MCA_MISC0 available. */
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, smca_misc_banks_map);
-
static void amd_threshold_interrupt(void);
static void amd_deferred_error_interrupt(void);
@@ -264,28 +261,6 @@ static void default_deferred_error_interrupt(void)
}
void (*deferred_error_int_vector)(void) = default_deferred_error_interrupt;
-static void smca_set_misc_banks_map(unsigned int bank, unsigned int cpu)
-{
- u32 low, high;
-
- /*
- * For SMCA enabled processors, BLKPTR field of the first MISC register
- * (MCx_MISC0) indicates presence of additional MISC regs set (MISC1-4).
- */
- if (rdmsr_safe(MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_CONFIG(bank), &low, &high))
- return;
-
- if (!(low & MCI_CONFIG_MCAX))
- return;
-
- if (rdmsr_safe(MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_MISC(bank), &low, &high))
- return;
-
- if (low & MASK_BLKPTR_LO)
- per_cpu(smca_misc_banks_map, cpu) |= BIT_ULL(bank);
-
-}
-
static void smca_configure(unsigned int bank, unsigned int cpu)
{
u8 *bank_counts = this_cpu_ptr(smca_bank_counts);
@@ -326,8 +301,6 @@ static void smca_configure(unsigned int bank, unsigned int cpu)
wrmsr(smca_config, low, high);
}
- smca_set_misc_banks_map(bank, cpu);
-
if (rdmsr_safe(MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_IPID(bank), &low, &high)) {
pr_warn("Failed to read MCA_IPID for bank %d\n", bank);
return;
@@ -532,9 +505,6 @@ static u32 smca_get_block_address(unsigned int bank, unsigned int block,
if (!block)
return MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_MISC(bank);
- if (!(per_cpu(smca_misc_banks_map, cpu) & BIT_ULL(bank)))
- return 0;
-
return MSR_AMD64_SMCA_MCx_MISCy(bank, block - 1);
}
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-15 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-15 14:54 [PATCH v3 00/17] AMD MCA interrupts rework Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-15 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] x86/mce: Don't remove sysfs if thresholding sysfs init fails Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-15 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] x86/mce/amd: Remove return value for mce_threshold_{create,remove}_device() Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-15 14:54 ` Yazen Ghannam [this message]
2025-04-15 14:54 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] x86/mce/amd: Put list_head in threshold_bank Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-15 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] x86/mce: Cleanup bank processing on init Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-15 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] x86/mce: Remove __mcheck_cpu_init_early() Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-15 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] x86/mce: Define BSP-only init Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-17 2:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-01 17:07 ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-15 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] x86/mce: Define BSP-only SMCA init Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-17 9:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-01 17:12 ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-15 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] x86/mce: Do 'UNKNOWN' vendor check early Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-15 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] x86/mce: Separate global and per-CPU quirks Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-17 12:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-01 17:23 ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-15 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] x86/mce: Move machine_check_poll() status checks to helper functions Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-15 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] x86/mce: Unify AMD THR handler with MCA Polling Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-15 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] x86/mce: Unify AMD DFR " Yazen Ghannam
2025-05-07 9:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-08 15:37 ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-15 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] x86/mce/amd: Enable interrupt vectors once per-CPU on SMCA systems Yazen Ghannam
2025-05-07 19:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-08 15:53 ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-05-09 14:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-12 15:34 ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-15 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] x86/mce/amd: Support SMCA Corrected Error Interrupt Yazen Ghannam
2025-05-09 19:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-12 15:35 ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-15 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] x86/mce: Handle AMD threshold interrupt storms Yazen Ghannam
2025-04-15 14:55 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] x86/mce: Restore poll settings after storm subsides Yazen Ghannam
2025-05-12 7:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-12 15:43 ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-05-12 15:53 ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-13 17:44 ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-05-13 17:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-13 21:06 ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-05-13 22:07 ` Luck, Tony
2025-05-14 14:34 ` Yazen Ghannam
2025-05-15 12:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-15 15:47 ` Yazen Ghannam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250415-wip-mca-updates-v3-3-8ffd9eb4aa56@amd.com \
--to=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
--cc=Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox