Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Mark Fasheh" <mark@fasheh.com>,
	tytso@mit.edu, "Joel Becker" <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	"Joseph Qi" <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	dsterba@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 02/28] ecryptfs: fall back to a read-only lower file
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 10:32:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-167961@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012-work-fs-sb_rdonly-v1-2-60743a3dc326@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] vfs: truncate() returns -EBADF instead of -EROFS when the lower filesystem enforces read-only access
--

commit 3ef5a823b2848ace16dfa265a339c30dd189a39c
Author: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>

ecryptfs: fall back to a read-only lower file

This commit introduces a fallback in eCryptfs when opening a lower file.
If opening the file with write permissions returns -EROFS, it will try
again with O_RDONLY. This allows reading files even when the underlying
filesystem is read-only.

> diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/kthread.c b/fs/ecryptfs/kthread.c
> index ae4cb4e2e1348..ba94b304edf3f 100644
> --- a/fs/ecryptfs/kthread.c
> +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/kthread.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,21 @@ static struct ecryptfs_kthread_ctl {
>  
>  static struct task_struct *ecryptfs_kthread;
>  
> +/*
> + * A filesystem can refuse writes while its superblock stays read-write, e.g.
> + * after an error, and a read-only mount refuses them as well. Reading still
> + * works so fall back to that.
> + */
> +static struct file *ecryptfs_open_lower(const struct path *path, int flags,
> +					const struct cred *cred)
> +{
> +	struct file *file = dentry_open(path, flags, cred);
> +
> +	if (PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(file) == -EROFS && (flags & O_ACCMODE) == O_RDWR)
> +		file = dentry_open(path, (flags & ~O_ACCMODE) | O_RDONLY, cred);
        ^^^^

[Severity: Medium]
Will this fallback cause userspace to receive -EBADF instead of -EROFS
for truncate operations?

If an unprivileged user calls truncate() on an eCryptfs file backed by a
read-only lower filesystem:

sys_truncate() -> do_truncate() -> notify_change() -> ecryptfs_setattr()
    -> __ecryptfs_truncate()

__ecryptfs_truncate() calls ecryptfs_get_lower_file(), which will successfully
obtain an O_RDONLY file descriptor due to this new fallback logic.

__ecryptfs_truncate() then blindly assumes the file is writable and attempts
write operations:

fs/ecryptfs/inode.c:__ecryptfs_truncate() {
    ...
    rc = ecryptfs_write(inode, zero, ia->ia_size - 1, 1);
    ...
}

Because the underlying struct file lacks FMODE_WRITE, kernel_write() inside
ecryptfs_write() will fail with -EBADF. This leaks an invalid -EBADF error
code to userspace instead of the expected -EROFS or -EACCES.

> +	return file;
> +}
> +

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261012-work-fs-sb_rdonly-v1-0-60743a3dc326@kernel.org?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-12 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-12 10:20 [PATCH RFC 00/28] fs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 01/28] ecryptfs: don't leak the inode when a lookup can't open the lower file Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 02/28] ecryptfs: fall back to a read-only " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:32   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 03/28] ext2: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 04/28] jfs: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 05/28] nilfs2: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:01   ` Ryusuke Konishi
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 06/28] fat: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 07/28] exfat: keep the current mount options on remount Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 08/28] exfat: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 09/28] hfs: don't set SB_RDONLY after MDB write errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 22:57   ` [Jfs-discussion] " Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 10/28] hfsplus: don't set SB_RDONLY when creating the attributes tree Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 22:34   ` [Jfs-discussion] " Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 11/28] affs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 12/28] ufs: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 13/28] hpfs: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 14/28] ntfs: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 15/28] ocfs2: keep options that can't change on remount Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 16/28] ocfs2: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 17/28] zonefs: don't set SB_RDONLY after I/O errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 18/28] btrfs: check BTRFS_FS_STATE_RO instead of SB_RDONLY at runtime Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 19/28] btrfs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 11:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 20/28] gfs2: wait for a pending withdraw before remounting read-only Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 21/28] gfs2: don't set SB_RDONLY on withdraw Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 22/28] efivarfs: stop using SB_RDONLY for read-only efivar ops Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 23/28] ubifs: don't set SB_RDONLY after errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 11:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 24/28] selftests/filesystems: test filesystem errors while frozen Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 25/28] ext4: allow remounting read-only in the emergency state Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 16:38   ` Jan Kara
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 26/28] selftests/filesystems: test ext4 remounts " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 27/28] xfs: allow remounting read-only after a shutdown Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13  7:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 28/28] selftests/filesystems: test xfs remounts " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13  7:40   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-12 16:53 ` [PATCH RFC 00/28] fs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-167961@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox