From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, "Joel Becker" <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
"Mark Fasheh" <mark@fasheh.com>,
dsterba@suse.cz, "Joseph Qi" <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 14/28] ntfs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 10:45:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-167983@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012-work-fs-sb_rdonly-v1-14-60743a3dc326@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] vfs: ABBA deadlock between umount and thaw_super on frozen NTFS
--
commit dfc5fc432ef752d67cfa9b90f071205bebdf7f7a
Author: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
ntfs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors
This commit updates NTFS to handle errors by setting NV_EmergencyRO instead
of SB_RDONLY to avoid leaving s_writers locked after thawing. It introduces
an asynchronous work item to mark the volume dirty on disk and flushes/syncs
this work during unmount.
> diff --git a/fs/ntfs/super.c b/fs/ntfs/super.c
> index 4066bacabe377..12ad2ce938ba9 100644
> --- a/fs/ntfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ntfs/super.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -423,6 +446,29 @@ int ntfs_set_volume_flags(struct ntfs_volume *vol, __le16 flags)
> return ntfs_write_volume_flags(vol, vol->vol_flags | flags);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * ntfs_error_work - mark the volume dirty on disk after an error
> + * @work: the error_work of the ntfs volume
> + *
> + * VOLUME_IS_DIRTY makes chkdsk check the volume. It is set lazily on the first
> + * modification and ntfs_sync_fs() clears it again, so it may not be on disk
> + * when an error makes the volume read-only, and the inode writeback that would
> + * write it is refused from then on. __ntfs_write_inode() still writes $Volume
> + * in that state. This runs from a work item because ntfs_error() may be called
> + * with mft records locked. sb_start_intwrite() waits for a frozen volume to be
> + * thawed.
> + */
> +static void ntfs_error_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct ntfs_volume *vol = container_of(work, struct ntfs_volume,
> + error_work);
> +
> + sb_start_intwrite(vol->sb);
[Severity: High]
Could this cause an ABBA deadlock if an error occurs while the filesystem
is frozen?
If the filesystem is frozen via freeze_super(), the VFS holds a write lock
on sb->s_writers.rw_sem. The worker executing ntfs_error_work() blocks here
indefinitely waiting for a thaw operation to release that lock.
> + if (!ntfs_set_volume_flags(vol, VOLUME_IS_DIRTY))
> + ntfs_commit_inode(vol->vol_ino);
> + sb_end_intwrite(vol->sb);
> +}
[ ... ]
> @@ -1716,6 +1762,15 @@ static void ntfs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
>
> cancel_work_sync(&vol->precalc_work);
>
> + /*
> + * If an error made the volume read-only, make sure it is marked dirty
> + * even if the error work didn't get to run. The commit of $Volume
> + * below writes it.
> + */
> + disable_work_sync(&vol->error_work);
[Severity: High]
Does this sequence lead to an unresolvable 3-way deadlock between the error
worker, umount, and thaw_super()?
If the error worker is blocked on sb_start_intwrite() as noted above, and
the user attempts to unmount the filesystem, deactivate_super() acquires
down_write(&sb->s_umount) before calling ntfs_put_super().
The disable_work_sync() call here will block forever waiting for the worker
to finish, keeping sb->s_umount held by the unmount process.
To recover the filesystem, the user must call thaw_super(), but that
requires acquiring down_write(&sb->s_umount), which is now stuck behind
the blocked unmount.
> + if (NVolEmergencyRO(vol))
> + ntfs_set_volume_flags(vol, VOLUME_IS_DIRTY);
> +
> /*
> * Commit all inodes while they are still open in case some of them
> * cause others to be dirtied.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261012-work-fs-sb_rdonly-v1-0-60743a3dc326@kernel.org?part=14
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 10:20 [PATCH RFC 00/28] fs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 01/28] ecryptfs: don't leak the inode when a lookup can't open the lower file Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 02/28] ecryptfs: fall back to a read-only " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 03/28] ext2: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 04/28] jfs: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 05/28] nilfs2: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:01 ` Ryusuke Konishi
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 06/28] fat: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 07/28] exfat: keep the current mount options on remount Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 08/28] exfat: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 09/28] hfs: don't set SB_RDONLY after MDB write errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 22:57 ` [Jfs-discussion] " Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 10/28] hfsplus: don't set SB_RDONLY when creating the attributes tree Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 22:34 ` [Jfs-discussion] " Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 11/28] affs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 12/28] ufs: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 13/28] hpfs: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 14/28] ntfs: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 15/28] ocfs2: keep options that can't change on remount Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 16/28] ocfs2: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 17/28] zonefs: don't set SB_RDONLY after I/O errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 18/28] btrfs: check BTRFS_FS_STATE_RO instead of SB_RDONLY at runtime Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 19/28] btrfs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 11:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 20/28] gfs2: wait for a pending withdraw before remounting read-only Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 21/28] gfs2: don't set SB_RDONLY on withdraw Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 22/28] efivarfs: stop using SB_RDONLY for read-only efivar ops Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 23/28] ubifs: don't set SB_RDONLY after errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 11:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 24/28] selftests/filesystems: test filesystem errors while frozen Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 25/28] ext4: allow remounting read-only in the emergency state Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 16:38 ` Jan Kara
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 26/28] selftests/filesystems: test ext4 remounts " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 27/28] xfs: allow remounting read-only after a shutdown Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 7:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 28/28] selftests/filesystems: test xfs remounts " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 7:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-12 16:53 ` [PATCH RFC 00/28] fs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Jan Kara
2026-10-13 19:39 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-167983@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox