From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: "Mark Fasheh" <mark@fasheh.com>,
"Joseph Qi" <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Joel Becker" <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, dsterba@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 22/28] efivarfs: stop using SB_RDONLY for read-only efivar ops
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 10:52:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-167991@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012-work-fs-sb_rdonly-v1-22-60743a3dc326@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] efi: NULL pointer derefs in efivar_lock() and efivar_set_variable_locked()
--
commit 8baf8c78bb84688313f856459551571bca3c4964
Author: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
efivarfs: stop using SB_RDONLY for read-only efivar ops
This commit introduces a private flag EFIVARFS_OPS_RDONLY to track whether
efivar operations are read-only, replacing the use of SB_RDONLY. It aims to
resolve freeze and thaw deadlocks caused by concurrent modifications to the
superblock flags.
> diff --git a/fs/efivarfs/file.c b/fs/efivarfs/file.c
> index cb1b6d0c34545..a074145fa57e1 100644
> --- a/fs/efivarfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/efivarfs/file.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ static ssize_t efivarfs_file_write(struct file *file,
> ssize_t bytes;
> bool set = false;
>
> + if (efivarfs_ops_rdonly(inode->i_sb))
> + return -EROFS;
> +
[Severity: High]
Does this lockless validation allow a race condition that leads to a NULL
pointer dereference?
If a user-space process initiates a write, it evaluates this check outside of
efivars_lock. Concurrently, if a module like tee_stmm_efi is removed or
fails probing, efivars_unregister() may set __efivars to NULL.
When the racing write thread subsequently attempts to acquire the lock via
efivar_lock(), it does the following:
drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c:efivar_lock() {
if (down_interruptible(&efivars_lock))
return -EINTR;
if (!__efivars->ops) {
up(&efivars_lock);
return -ENODEV;
}
...
Evaluating !__efivars->ops will unconditionally dereference __efivars,
crashing if it is NULL.
Alternatively, if a generic_ops struct lacking a set_variable callback is
registered immediately after, efivar_set_variable_locked() executes:
drivers/firmware/efi/vars.c:efivar_set_variable_locked() {
...
setvar = __efivars->ops->set_variable_nonblocking;
if (!setvar || !nonblocking)
setvar = __efivars->ops->set_variable;
return setvar(name, vendor, attr, data_size, data);
}
This attempts to call a NULL setvar pointer without validation, which also
leads to a crash.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261012-work-fs-sb_rdonly-v1-0-60743a3dc326@kernel.org?part=22
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 10:20 [PATCH RFC 00/28] fs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 01/28] ecryptfs: don't leak the inode when a lookup can't open the lower file Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 02/28] ecryptfs: fall back to a read-only " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 03/28] ext2: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 04/28] jfs: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 05/28] nilfs2: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:01 ` Ryusuke Konishi
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 06/28] fat: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 07/28] exfat: keep the current mount options on remount Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 08/28] exfat: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 09/28] hfs: don't set SB_RDONLY after MDB write errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 22:57 ` [Jfs-discussion] " Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 10/28] hfsplus: don't set SB_RDONLY when creating the attributes tree Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 22:34 ` [Jfs-discussion] " Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 11/28] affs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 12/28] ufs: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 13/28] hpfs: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 14/28] ntfs: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 15/28] ocfs2: keep options that can't change on remount Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 16/28] ocfs2: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 17/28] zonefs: don't set SB_RDONLY after I/O errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 18/28] btrfs: check BTRFS_FS_STATE_RO instead of SB_RDONLY at runtime Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 19/28] btrfs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 11:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 20/28] gfs2: wait for a pending withdraw before remounting read-only Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 21/28] gfs2: don't set SB_RDONLY on withdraw Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 22/28] efivarfs: stop using SB_RDONLY for read-only efivar ops Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 23/28] ubifs: don't set SB_RDONLY after errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 11:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 24/28] selftests/filesystems: test filesystem errors while frozen Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 25/28] ext4: allow remounting read-only in the emergency state Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 16:38 ` Jan Kara
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 26/28] selftests/filesystems: test ext4 remounts " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 27/28] xfs: allow remounting read-only after a shutdown Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 7:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 28/28] selftests/filesystems: test xfs remounts " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 7:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-12 16:53 ` [PATCH RFC 00/28] fs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-167991@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox