Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: "Joseph Qi" <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
	dsterba@suse.cz, "Mark Fasheh" <mark@fasheh.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
	"Joel Becker" <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 13/28] hpfs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 10:35:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-167966@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012-work-fs-sb_rdonly-v1-13-60743a3dc326@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] vfs: hpfs: writeback, mmap, and eviction bypass emergency RO state
- [Medium] vfs: hpfs: read-write remount bypasses -EROFS rejection
--

commit fff4d175276350a79a5a1bcb72eb2e0bb0259054
Author: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
hpfs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors

This commit replaces setting SB_RDONLY with a new HPFS_STATE_EMERGENCY_RO
flag during runtime filesystem errors. This avoids blocking on s_writers
locks if the filesystem is frozen.

> diff --git a/fs/hpfs/super.c b/fs/hpfs/super.c
> index 8fbdbf0806276..cff963cabbb63 100644
> --- a/fs/hpfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/hpfs/super.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,18 @@ void hpfs_error(struct super_block *s, const char *fmt, ...)
>  			else {
>  				pr_cont("; remounting read-only\n");
>  				mark_dirty(s, 0);
> -				s->s_flags |= SB_RDONLY;
> +				/*
> +				 * Only a mount in progress may still set
> +				 * SB_RDONLY: later that needs s->s_umount,
> +				 * and on a frozen superblock it makes
> +				 * thaw_super() leave s_writers locked.
> +				 * Refuse modifications until umount instead.
> +				 */
> +				if (s->s_flags & SB_BORN)
> +					set_bit(HPFS_STATE_EMERGENCY_RO,
> +						&hpfs_sb(s)->sb_state);
> +				else
> +					s->s_flags |= SB_RDONLY;

[Severity: High]
Because the VFS SB_RDONLY flag is no longer set here, the VFS background
writeback thread and generic memory-mapped page faults will no longer
automatically skip the filesystem.

While the namespace operations were appropriately updated, could this allow
dirty pages from mmap to be written out since hpfs_writepages() doesn't
check the emergency read-only state? Similarly, could hpfs_evict_inode()
mutate the btree and sector bitmaps on a corrupted filesystem when an
unlinked inode is evicted?

[ ... ]

> @@ -426,6 +437,11 @@ static int hpfs_reconfigure(struct fs_context *fc)
>  	struct super_block *s = fc->root->d_sb;
>  	struct hpfs_sb_info *sbi = hpfs_sb(s);
>  
> +	/* After an error, refuse going back to read-write until umount. */
> +	if (hpfs_emergency_ro(s) && sb_rdonly(s) &&
> +	    !(fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY))
> +		return -EROFS;

[Severity: Medium]
The commit message states "A remount to read-write fails with -EROFS until
umount". However, if the filesystem experienced the runtime error while
originally mounted read-write, hpfs_error() sets HPFS_STATE_EMERGENCY_RO
but not SB_RDONLY.

In that scenario, sb_rdonly(s) is false. When a user subsequently executes
a read-write remount, does this check inadvertently bypass the -EROFS
rejection and allow the remount to succeed since sb_rdonly(s) evaluates
to false?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261012-work-fs-sb_rdonly-v1-0-60743a3dc326@kernel.org?part=13

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-12 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-12 10:20 [PATCH RFC 00/28] fs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 01/28] ecryptfs: don't leak the inode when a lookup can't open the lower file Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 02/28] ecryptfs: fall back to a read-only " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 03/28] ext2: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 04/28] jfs: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 05/28] nilfs2: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:01   ` Ryusuke Konishi
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 06/28] fat: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 07/28] exfat: keep the current mount options on remount Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 08/28] exfat: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 09/28] hfs: don't set SB_RDONLY after MDB write errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 22:57   ` [Jfs-discussion] " Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 10/28] hfsplus: don't set SB_RDONLY when creating the attributes tree Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 22:34   ` [Jfs-discussion] " Viacheslav Dubeyko
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 11/28] affs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 12/28] ufs: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 13/28] hpfs: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:35   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-12 10:20 ` [PATCH RFC 14/28] ntfs: " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 15/28] ocfs2: keep options that can't change on remount Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 16/28] ocfs2: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 17/28] zonefs: don't set SB_RDONLY after I/O errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 18/28] btrfs: check BTRFS_FS_STATE_RO instead of SB_RDONLY at runtime Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 19/28] btrfs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 11:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 20/28] gfs2: wait for a pending withdraw before remounting read-only Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 21/28] gfs2: don't set SB_RDONLY on withdraw Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 22/28] efivarfs: stop using SB_RDONLY for read-only efivar ops Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 23/28] ubifs: don't set SB_RDONLY after errors Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 11:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 24/28] selftests/filesystems: test filesystem errors while frozen Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 25/28] ext4: allow remounting read-only in the emergency state Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 16:38   ` Jan Kara
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 26/28] selftests/filesystems: test ext4 remounts " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 27/28] xfs: allow remounting read-only after a shutdown Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13  7:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-12 10:21 ` [PATCH RFC 28/28] selftests/filesystems: test xfs remounts " Christian Brauner
2026-10-12 10:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13  7:40   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-12 16:53 ` [PATCH RFC 00/28] fs: don't set SB_RDONLY after filesystem errors Jan Kara
2026-10-13 19:39   ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-167966@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark@fasheh.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox