From: Yann Sionneau <yann@sionneau.net>
To: Jan Bottorff <janb@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@kalrayinc.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Julian Vetter <jvetter@kalrayinc.com>, Jonathan Borne <jborne@kalray.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Fix corrupted memory seen in the ISR
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:44:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ee0acbd-e332-4dc5-a6e6-0df58913ff71@sionneau.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab57ba73-ce62-43fc-9cb1-d2db1bd13cd9@os.amperecomputing.com>
Le 31/10/2023 à 01:12, Jan Bottorff a écrit :
> On 10/26/2023 4:18 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> So, someone wants to come up with a patch to move to non-relaxed io
>> accessors?
>>
> Is the current thinking to just make writes to DW_IC_INTR_MASK use the
> non-relaxed variant or something more broad?
>
> From a safest functioning viewpoint, we talked about making all
> accessors default to non-relaxed variants. A couple of pretty good
> arguments from knowledgeable people favored this. I know there also
> was some concerns about potential performance impact this might have
> although the counter argument was this is a pretty low speed device so
> some extra cpu cycles on register accesses were not likely to degrade
> overall performance.
>
> I could make the patch if we have consensus (or maintainers decision)
> on which way to go: 1) only writes to DW_IC_INTR_MASK are non-relaxed,
> 2) make all read/write accessors use the non-relaxed version.
>
> I'm personally in camp #2, safety first, performance fine tuning later
> if needed. Latent missing barrier bugs are difficult and time
> consuming to find.
Fine with me, let's go for #2 :)
Regards,
--
Yann
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-31 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-13 23:29 [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Fix corrupted memory seen in the ISR Jan Bottorff
2023-09-14 18:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-14 18:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-14 20:52 ` Jan Bottorff
2023-09-15 12:44 ` Jarkko Nikula
2023-09-15 15:21 ` Serge Semin
2023-09-16 1:47 ` Jan Bottorff
2023-09-17 0:01 ` Serge Semin
2023-09-17 20:08 ` Yann Sionneau
2023-09-18 23:14 ` Serge Semin
2023-09-19 3:45 ` Jan Bottorff
2023-09-19 9:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-09-19 10:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-09-19 12:38 ` Yann Sionneau
2023-09-19 14:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-09-19 14:55 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-09-19 18:54 ` Jan Bottorff
2023-09-19 21:05 ` Serge Semin
2023-09-20 9:08 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-09-20 13:27 ` Yann Sionneau
2023-09-20 19:14 ` Jan Bottorff
2023-09-25 12:54 ` Serge Semin
2023-09-25 19:39 ` Jan Bottorff
2023-09-27 19:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-09-29 8:48 ` Jarkko Nikula
2023-10-26 11:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-10-31 0:12 ` Jan Bottorff
2023-10-31 5:51 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-10-31 8:44 ` Yann Sionneau [this message]
2023-10-31 12:10 ` Jarkko Nikula
2023-10-31 13:06 ` Serge Semin
2023-11-01 16:51 ` Jan Bottorff
2023-09-20 11:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-09-20 10:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-09-20 11:05 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7ee0acbd-e332-4dc5-a6e6-0df58913ff71@sionneau.net \
--to=yann@sionneau.net \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=janb@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jborne@kalray.eu \
--cc=jsd@semihalf.com \
--cc=jvetter@kalrayinc.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
--cc=ysionneau@kalrayinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox