public inbox for linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yann Sionneau <yann@sionneau.net>
To: Jan Bottorff <janb@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
	Yann Sionneau <ysionneau@kalrayinc.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Julian Vetter <jvetter@kalrayinc.com>, Jonathan Borne <jborne@kalray.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Fix corrupted memory seen in the ISR
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:44:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ee0acbd-e332-4dc5-a6e6-0df58913ff71@sionneau.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab57ba73-ce62-43fc-9cb1-d2db1bd13cd9@os.amperecomputing.com>


Le 31/10/2023 à 01:12, Jan Bottorff a écrit :
> On 10/26/2023 4:18 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> So, someone wants to come up with a patch to move to non-relaxed io
>> accessors?
>>
> Is the current thinking to just make writes to DW_IC_INTR_MASK use the 
> non-relaxed variant or something more broad?
>
> From a safest functioning viewpoint, we talked about making all 
> accessors default to non-relaxed variants. A couple of pretty good 
> arguments from knowledgeable people favored this. I know there also 
> was some concerns about potential performance impact this might have 
> although the counter argument was this is a pretty low speed device so 
> some extra cpu cycles on register accesses were not likely to degrade 
> overall performance.
>
> I could make the patch if we have consensus (or maintainers decision) 
> on which way to go: 1) only writes to DW_IC_INTR_MASK are non-relaxed, 
> 2) make all read/write accessors use the non-relaxed version.
>
> I'm personally in camp #2, safety first, performance fine tuning later 
> if needed. Latent missing barrier bugs are difficult and time 
> consuming to find.

Fine with me, let's go for #2 :)

Regards,

-- 

Yann


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-31  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-13 23:29 [PATCH v2] i2c: designware: Fix corrupted memory seen in the ISR Jan Bottorff
2023-09-14 18:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-14 18:47   ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-09-14 20:52     ` Jan Bottorff
2023-09-15 12:44 ` Jarkko Nikula
2023-09-15 15:21 ` Serge Semin
2023-09-16  1:47   ` Jan Bottorff
2023-09-17  0:01     ` Serge Semin
2023-09-17 20:08       ` Yann Sionneau
2023-09-18 23:14         ` Serge Semin
2023-09-19  3:45           ` Jan Bottorff
2023-09-19  9:55             ` Catalin Marinas
2023-09-19 10:19               ` Wolfram Sang
2023-09-19 12:38                 ` Yann Sionneau
2023-09-19 14:51                   ` Catalin Marinas
2023-09-19 14:55                     ` Wolfram Sang
2023-09-19 18:54                     ` Jan Bottorff
2023-09-19 21:05                       ` Serge Semin
2023-09-20  9:08                         ` Wolfram Sang
2023-09-20 13:27                           ` Yann Sionneau
2023-09-20 19:14                             ` Jan Bottorff
2023-09-25 12:54                               ` Serge Semin
2023-09-25 19:39                                 ` Jan Bottorff
2023-09-27 19:38                                   ` Wolfram Sang
2023-09-29  8:48                                     ` Jarkko Nikula
2023-10-26 11:18                                       ` Wolfram Sang
2023-10-31  0:12                                         ` Jan Bottorff
2023-10-31  5:51                                           ` Wolfram Sang
2023-10-31  8:44                                           ` Yann Sionneau [this message]
2023-10-31 12:10                                             ` Jarkko Nikula
2023-10-31 13:06                                               ` Serge Semin
2023-11-01 16:51                                                 ` Jan Bottorff
2023-09-20 11:03                         ` Catalin Marinas
2023-09-20 10:44                       ` Catalin Marinas
2023-09-20 11:05                         ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7ee0acbd-e332-4dc5-a6e6-0df58913ff71@sionneau.net \
    --to=yann@sionneau.net \
    --cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
    --cc=janb@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jborne@kalray.eu \
    --cc=jsd@semihalf.com \
    --cc=jvetter@kalrayinc.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=ysionneau@kalrayinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox