Re: [PATCH RFC leds-next] leds: initial support for Turris Omnia LEDs

[Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz>]

On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 22:19:50 +0200
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 4/2/20 4:29 PM, Marek Behun wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 14:53:57 +0200
> > Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com> wrote:
> >   
> >>> in the case you mentioned there is a one "global" brightness setting per
> >>> each RGB LED. On Omnia, all 12 RGB LEDs have just one "global"
> >>> brightness property. Ie. I press the button, and all 12 LEDs glow get
> >>> dimmer. So there could be a 13th LED device with color LUMA, but what
> >>> function should it be given in DTS?    
> >>
> >> Then, in this particular case, adding devicename prefix for the whole
> >> family of LEDs would be justified. The question is whether it should be
> >> hardware related name or rather something different.  
> > 
> > Hi Jacek,
> > 
> > so now we have
> >   device:color:function
> > what if we made it so that there was a 4th part of LED name, ie
> >   group:device:color:function
> > ?
> > 
> > Would this be a problem?  
> 
> Indeed, the device alone would not be a sufficient differentiator
> since it is possible to have more than one LED controller of the
> same type on the board.
> 
> Nonetheless, I'd rather avoid the addition of a new generic section.
> Probably we would have to make it specific to this device.
> 

Ok, in that case I will do it so that devicename is "omnia".
devicename_mandatory should be set to true, yes?
Marek