From: Theo Van Dinter <felicity@kluge.net>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Backup costs (was: LVM reimplementationre)
Date: Wed Feb 6 13:48:01 2002 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020206145137.J427@kluge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202061338480.13203-100000@dragon.inside.ntisys.com>; from bscott@ntisys.com on Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:14:05PM -0500
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:14:05PM -0500, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> Here are some prices from a recent Datacomm Warehouse catalog:
>
> Item GB Cost $/GB
> -------------- --- ---- ----
> IDE HDD 100 270 2.70
> AIT2 50 90 1.80
> SuperDLT 110 150 1.36
> LTO Ultrium 100 130 1.30
> DDS-4 20 24 1.20
>
> As you can see, hard disk is actually the most expensive media, not the
> least. This whole "hard disks are cheaper" thing is a myth propagated by
> people who have never actually looked at the numbers.
Pot, kettle, black.
Yes, a AIT2 _TAPE_ is $90, but you need to factor in the drive, otherwise
the media is useless. A $270 IDE drive is ready to go. A quick look at
warehouse.com (to keep the numbers on-par):
AIT2 drive/Sony 2800 + 90 (tape) / 50GB = 57.80
SuperDLT drive/LaCie 5000 + 150 (tape) / 110GB = 46.82
LTO Ultrium drive/HP 3650 + 130 (tape) / 100GB = 37.80
DDS-4 drive/Seagate 970 + 24 (tape) / 20GB = 49.70
So yes, not surprisingly, tape is more expensive than disk everytime.
Even if you halfed the prices assuming full (2x) compression on the
tape. Now over time, the per GB price of tape will come down since you
only need the large outlay of cash once, but you can only use one tape
at a time at any given moment.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"perl is awesome, perl is great
perl gets my programs running without all the wait,
perl lets me do my job smooth as silk,
it even stays crispy in milk.." - Greg London
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-06 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-31 13:54 [linux-lvm] Re: [lvm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] LVM reimplementation ready for beta testing Steve Pratt
2002-01-31 14:05 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [lvm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] LVM reimplementationre ady " Jeff Layton
2002-02-01 3:29 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-02-01 9:43 ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-05 8:04 ` James Hawtin
2002-02-05 8:09 ` Patrick Caulfield
2002-02-05 11:13 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-05 12:28 ` [linux-lvm] (OT) Backups (was Re: LVM reimplementationre ady for beta testing...) Chad C. Walstrom
2002-02-06 13:13 ` [linux-lvm] Backup costs (was: LVM reimplementationre) Benjamin Scott
2002-02-06 13:39 ` Daniel Whicker
2002-02-06 13:46 ` James Mello
2002-02-06 14:35 ` Anders Widman
2002-02-07 3:01 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07 3:17 ` Petro
2002-02-07 4:34 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07 7:19 ` Petro
2002-02-07 7:54 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07 3:55 ` Dieter Stueken
2002-02-06 13:46 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-06 13:48 ` Theo Van Dinter [this message]
2002-02-06 15:45 ` Austin Gonyou
2002-02-06 13:51 ` Petro
2002-02-06 13:52 ` Kirby C. Bohling
2002-02-06 13:55 ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-06 14:03 ` James Mello
2002-02-06 20:03 ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-06 20:08 ` James Mello
2002-02-06 20:11 ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-07 3:10 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07 4:53 ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-07 5:31 ` James Hawtin
2002-02-07 17:05 ` Wolfgang Weisselberg
2002-02-08 20:04 ` James Hawtin
2002-02-07 3:03 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07 3:17 ` Petro
2002-02-07 4:15 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-12 1:00 ` Marc MERLIN
2002-01-31 15:19 ` [Evms-devel] Re: [linux-lvm] Re: [lvm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] LVM reimplementation ready for beta testing Andrew Clausen
2002-02-01 3:47 ` Joe Thornber
2002-02-01 3:55 ` [Evms-devel] " Arjan van de Ven
2002-02-01 4:04 ` Joe Thornber
2002-02-01 4:13 ` [linux-lvm] " Arjan van de Ven
2002-02-01 4:31 ` Joe Thornber
2002-02-01 5:06 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [Evms-devel] " Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-02-01 8:32 ` [linux-lvm] " Alan Cox
2002-02-01 8:59 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [Evms-devel] " Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-02-01 16:01 ` [evms-devel] [linux-lvm] " Kevin Corry
2002-02-01 17:17 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-02 7:40 ` Andrew Clausen
2002-02-02 13:30 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-03 6:22 ` Joe Thornber
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-06 21:10 [linux-lvm] Backup costs (was: LVM reimplementationre) Richard Barbara
2002-02-07 10:24 ` Scott Laird
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020206145137.J427@kluge.net \
--to=felicity@kluge.net \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox