From: Jeff Layton <laytonjb@bellsouth.net>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Re: [lvm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] LVM reimplementationre ady for beta testing
Date: Fri Feb 1 09:43:02 2002 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C5AB7CF.5C96DDFB@bellsouth.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020201102439.B15135@sistina.com
"Heinz J . Mauelshagen" wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 03:05:56PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > (snip)
> >
> > >
> > > >LVM2 may not seem that exciting initially, since the first release is
> > > >just concentrating on reproducing LVM1 functionality. But a lot of
> > > >the reason for this rewrite is to enable us to add in the new features
> > > >that we want (such as a transaction based disk format). It's on this
> > > >new feature list that we'll be mainly competing with EVMS.
> > >
> > > Why compete, come on over and help us :-)
> >
> > You guy man!
> >
> > I've worked with Kevin a few months ago on using EVMS
> > to recover a filesystem ontop of LVM when a disk went
> > south and we had no backups
>
> It is quite intersting how many people don't take backups even though
> almost everybody claims to know that backups are crucial and some of them
> know that they are still, even though they might have RAID in place.
I was ordered by my management NOT to make backups or
I would be fired (exact words). So, I didn't. I told everyone
concerned that we HAD to have backups and follow corporate
policy. Everyone said thank you and go away. So I did.
>
>
> Well I guess it, but you didn't mention if you had success to recover.
>
> Was it quorum (we are implementing it with LVM2 BTW) which helped and have
> you been lucky that at least a part of your LVs where sitting on other than the
> gone disk? Otherwise you probably had your VG back but no usable data.
Actually, we had partial success and got back most data. Then
on a whim we tried the bad drive again, and BINGO it came back
to life! I tried every trick I know to get that drive back and spoke
with the vendor that agreed I did everything they knew how to
do. Then another admin walked in, popped it back in the case and
and it came back. I had the biggest egg on my face! Oh well, at least
we got the data back.
>
>
> > (I know, but I was told by the
> > people in charge that backups were not needed - that's why
> > I left).
>
> Probably a good choice to leave if they don't understand such basics
> and you couldn't convince them.
<vent>
My manager at that time couldn't spell UNIX, doesn't have a college
degree of any type and has never taken a single college course. My lead
admin can only spell "Sun" even though he claims to have a Linux box at
home and is pretty much hated by all UNIX/Linux admins (as well as
most NT admins as well). He is the king of micro managers (and I have
seen plenty of these in the aerospace industry).
Thanks for the venting time and space. I apologize.
</vent>
>
>
> > I really like EVMS and can't wait for it to be in 2.5 and
> > then 2.6 (just keep up the patches for 2.4 please :)
>
> EVMS hallelujah on linux-lvm? ;-)
I like EVMS and it's concepts. However, I'm currently using LVM
(I learned LVM on HPUX, so it was trivial to move to LVM on
Linux!). So, I guess you could say that I started with LVM - like it,
use it, depend on it; moving on to EVMS after some experimentation
and testing. I hope the two merge at some point to avoid
proprietary-isms that seem to be coming.
Plus, I'm interested in the Open Cluster Framework
developments with EVMS. I don't know if these kinds of
things are happening with LVM or not.
Jeff
>
>
> >
> > Jeff Layton
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > > EVMS Development - http://www.sf.net/projects/evms
> > > Linux Technology Center - IBM Corporation
> > > (512) 838-9763 EMAIL: SLPratt@US.IBM.COM
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-lvm mailing list
> > > linux-lvm@sistina.com
> > > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> > > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-lvm mailing list
> > linux-lvm@sistina.com
> > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
>
> *** Software bugs are stupid.
> Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
> Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
> 56242 Marienrachdorf
> Germany
> Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
> FAX 924446
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-01 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-31 13:54 [linux-lvm] Re: [lvm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] LVM reimplementation ready for beta testing Steve Pratt
2002-01-31 14:05 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [lvm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] LVM reimplementationre ady " Jeff Layton
2002-02-01 3:29 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-02-01 9:43 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2002-02-05 8:04 ` James Hawtin
2002-02-05 8:09 ` Patrick Caulfield
2002-02-05 11:13 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-05 12:28 ` [linux-lvm] (OT) Backups (was Re: LVM reimplementationre ady for beta testing...) Chad C. Walstrom
2002-02-06 13:13 ` [linux-lvm] Backup costs (was: LVM reimplementationre) Benjamin Scott
2002-02-06 13:39 ` Daniel Whicker
2002-02-06 13:46 ` James Mello
2002-02-06 14:35 ` Anders Widman
2002-02-07 3:01 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07 3:17 ` Petro
2002-02-07 4:34 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07 7:19 ` Petro
2002-02-07 7:54 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07 3:55 ` Dieter Stueken
2002-02-06 13:46 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-06 13:48 ` Theo Van Dinter
2002-02-06 15:45 ` Austin Gonyou
2002-02-06 13:51 ` Petro
2002-02-06 13:52 ` Kirby C. Bohling
2002-02-06 13:55 ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-06 14:03 ` James Mello
2002-02-06 20:03 ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-06 20:08 ` James Mello
2002-02-06 20:11 ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-07 3:10 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07 4:53 ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-07 5:31 ` James Hawtin
2002-02-07 17:05 ` Wolfgang Weisselberg
2002-02-08 20:04 ` James Hawtin
2002-02-07 3:03 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07 3:17 ` Petro
2002-02-07 4:15 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-12 1:00 ` Marc MERLIN
2002-01-31 15:19 ` [Evms-devel] Re: [linux-lvm] Re: [lvm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] LVM reimplementation ready for beta testing Andrew Clausen
2002-02-01 3:47 ` Joe Thornber
2002-02-01 3:55 ` [Evms-devel] " Arjan van de Ven
2002-02-01 4:04 ` Joe Thornber
2002-02-01 4:13 ` [linux-lvm] " Arjan van de Ven
2002-02-01 4:31 ` Joe Thornber
2002-02-01 5:06 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [Evms-devel] " Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-02-01 8:32 ` [linux-lvm] " Alan Cox
2002-02-01 8:59 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [Evms-devel] " Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-02-01 16:01 ` [evms-devel] [linux-lvm] " Kevin Corry
2002-02-01 17:17 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-02 7:40 ` Andrew Clausen
2002-02-02 13:30 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-03 6:22 ` Joe Thornber
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-01 4:06 [linux-lvm] Re: [lvm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] LVM reimplementationre ady " STEFANG(GMX)
2002-02-01 4:18 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-02-01 10:02 ` Steven Dake
2002-02-01 4:26 STEFANG(GMX)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C5AB7CF.5C96DDFB@bellsouth.net \
--to=laytonjb@bellsouth.net \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox