Linux LVM users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ <jesus_navarro@promofinarsa.es>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Backup costs (was: LVM reimplementationre)
Date: Thu Feb  7 04:34:01 2002	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C625820.6040807@promofinarsa.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020207091636.GD5188@auctionwatch.com

Hi, Petro:

Petro wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 10:00:45AM +0100, Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ wrote:


[...]

>>Well... let's consider all aspects.  I'm a sysadmin the kind of BOFH, so 
>>late in the evening I usually find myself a bit overloaded on beer. 
>>Specially on friday, if I have to stay at work past 5PM I have the 
>>irresistible temptation to go to the closet and piss*1 on the diskcabbinet.
>>
> 
>     Good way to guarentee you won't have kids. 
>


Fair enough.  I *don't* have childrens... but I tend to consider my PFY 
like a bastard of my bastardness, does it counts?

     
> 
>>For a backup policy you *must* take appart the media from the on-line 
>>data to be protected.  Having all your backup media in a single place is 
>>*BAAAAAAAD* idea (TM).


> 
>     Depends on your needs.


Yes: depends on my needs: If I need to recover any data, having *all*
your backup media in a single place is *BAAAAAAAD* idea (TM).  If this 
place is the same (or near to) the place where the production data is 
stored is simply unadjectivable.
If I don't need to recover data, I can go without any backup at all.


>     Depends on your needs.
>     Depends on your needs.
>     Depends on your needs.
>     Depends on your needs.
>     Depends on your needs.
>     Depends on your needs.
>     Depends on your needs.
>     Depends on your needs.
>     Depends on your needs.
>     Depends on your needs.
>     Depends on your needs.
>     Depends on your needs.
>     Depends on your needs.
> 
>     I have one database that changes fast enough that if it's 36 hours
>     old, we're basically just recovering it for the table structures. 
> 


In case of disaster, if your backup media is in the proximities of your 
production database (define "proximities" as needed) you won't be able 
to recover table structures.  One thing is what I say, and a *completely 
different* issue is to decide *what* to backup, and how, not where.


>     I've got another one that changes fast enough that it's not worth
>     backing up. If it's more than 2 hours old, starting from scratch is
>     fine. 
> 


So, the amount of change by unit time is your key to decide what you 
*need* to backup and what you don't?
Sound *extremly* odd to me.  I would say it should be *the value* of the 
material (this include the cost to recreate it anew too, obviously), not 
its change rate.


>     It the first case, off site backups don't make sense, so we have 2
>     backup hosts (seperated by about 10 feet currently, less in a day or
>     two) that get backups on an alternating (daily) basis. 
> 


They won't make sense deppending on its *cost*, not its change rate.


>     Oh, this is in addition to these databases being replicated pairs. 
> 


This doesn't add nothing to value your backup strategy.  Again the value 
is the key.  You have replicated in pairs, do you?  What then in case of 
fire on you operations center?  I'd bet you'll loose both of your servers.


>     Again, your backup strategy depends on your needs, your budget, and
>     your risk tolerance. 
>
>     It doesn't make sense to spend $10k for a backup solution for $20k of
>     data. It does make sense to spend $10k to backup $100k.  
> 


Of course.  Your backup strategy surely deppends... *on the data value* 
and only on this.  From the very beginning I stated that for "home data" 
just burning some CDs from time to time, or no backup at all can be good 
enough (but again, even burning some CDs has no sense in case you 
want/need your data even if your "PC-room" burns out, if you have your 
CDs on the same table the PC is).


> 
>>*1: Standard dramatization in place.  I *don't* do that (specilly true 
>>if my boss is reading this article X^D  )
>>
> 
>     No, but a handful of metal filings are (1) more effective, (2) less
>     traceble, and (3) less likely to get your pecker arced off. 
 

Yep.  But I don't find it quite as funny

-- 
SALUD,
Jes�s
***
jesus_navarro@promofinarsa.es
***

  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-07  4:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-31 13:54 [linux-lvm] Re: [lvm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] LVM reimplementation ready for beta testing Steve Pratt
2002-01-31 14:05 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [lvm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] LVM reimplementationre ady " Jeff Layton
2002-02-01  3:29   ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-02-01  9:43     ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-05  8:04     ` James Hawtin
2002-02-05  8:09       ` Patrick Caulfield
2002-02-05 11:13       ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-05 12:28         ` [linux-lvm] (OT) Backups (was Re: LVM reimplementationre ady for beta testing...) Chad C. Walstrom
2002-02-06 13:13       ` [linux-lvm] Backup costs (was: LVM reimplementationre) Benjamin Scott
2002-02-06 13:39         ` Daniel Whicker
2002-02-06 13:46           ` James Mello
2002-02-06 14:35             ` Anders Widman
2002-02-07  3:01               ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07  3:17                 ` Petro
2002-02-07  4:34                   ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ [this message]
2002-02-07  7:19                     ` Petro
2002-02-07  7:54                       ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07  3:55               ` Dieter Stueken
2002-02-06 13:46         ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-06 13:48         ` Theo Van Dinter
2002-02-06 15:45           ` Austin Gonyou
2002-02-06 13:51         ` Petro
2002-02-06 13:52         ` Kirby C. Bohling
2002-02-06 13:55         ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-06 14:03           ` James Mello
2002-02-06 20:03             ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-06 20:08               ` James Mello
2002-02-06 20:11                 ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-07  3:10                   ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07  4:53                     ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-07  5:31                       ` James Hawtin
2002-02-07 17:05                         ` Wolfgang Weisselberg
2002-02-08 20:04                           ` James Hawtin
2002-02-07  3:03           ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07  3:17             ` Petro
2002-02-07  4:15               ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-12  1:00             ` Marc MERLIN
2002-01-31 15:19 ` [Evms-devel] Re: [linux-lvm] Re: [lvm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] LVM reimplementation ready for beta testing Andrew Clausen
2002-02-01  3:47 ` Joe Thornber
2002-02-01  3:55   ` [Evms-devel] " Arjan van de Ven
2002-02-01  4:04     ` Joe Thornber
2002-02-01  4:13       ` [linux-lvm] " Arjan van de Ven
2002-02-01  4:31         ` Joe Thornber
2002-02-01  5:06         ` [linux-lvm] Re: [Evms-devel] " Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-02-01  8:32         ` [linux-lvm] " Alan Cox
2002-02-01  8:59           ` [linux-lvm] Re: [Evms-devel] " Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-02-01 16:01   ` [evms-devel] [linux-lvm] " Kevin Corry
2002-02-01 17:17     ` Alan Cox
2002-02-02  7:40     ` Andrew Clausen
2002-02-02 13:30       ` Alan Cox
2002-02-03  6:22     ` Joe Thornber
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-06 21:10 [linux-lvm] Backup costs (was: LVM reimplementationre) Richard Barbara
2002-02-07 10:24 ` Scott Laird

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C625820.6040807@promofinarsa.es \
    --to=jesus_navarro@promofinarsa.es \
    --cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox