From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>, Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>, Yi Lai <yi1.lai@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 7/9] perf/x86/intel: Drop fixed-counter PEBS constraints for baseline PEBS
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:22:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610222209.GF48970@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0636b71e-acb8-4e9e-bf55-2343471e52bd@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 07:42:16PM +0800, Mi, Dapeng wrote:
> >> including fixed counters (what the flag "PMU_FL_PEBS_ALL" indicates), like
> >> the below code shows.
> >>
> >> ```
> > Why the markdown nonsense? You're not an LLM, right? And you all know
> > I'm reading this in mutt. Its just visual noise.
> >
> > Anyway, please clarify the Changelog.
>
> Sorry for the visual noise. I'm using the thunderbird mail client, not
> sure why the markdown doesn't work.
How is it supposed to 'work'? LKML is plain text, there is no markup.
From what I can tell, there is this thunderbug markdown plugin to more
'easily' write HTML mail, but that is explicitly forbidden on LKML.
On top of that, markdown is utter garbage, the idiot that 'invented' it
explicitly ignored the pre-existing standard of: *bold*, /italics/,
_underline_ and -strike-through-, a convention that has existed longer
than markdown is even is a thing (heck it pre-dates computers!).
And yes, clearly I'm a dinosaur. But dammit, we stare at code and
comments (and email) in text editors, not some web render bullshit.
</rant>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 5:02 [Patch v2 0/9] perf/x86: Miscellaneous PMU bug fixes Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09 5:02 ` [Patch v2 1/9] perf/x86/intel: Remove anythread_deprecated bit from perf_capabilities Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09 5:02 ` [Patch v2 2/9] perf/x86: Introduce is_x86_pmu() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09 5:02 ` [Patch v2 3/9] perf/x86: Update cap_user_rdpmc base on rdpmc user disable state Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10 1:47 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09 5:02 ` [Patch v2 4/9] perf/x86/intel: Fallback to sw branch type decoding if no hw decoding Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09 5:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 10:04 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09 14:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10 1:53 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09 5:02 ` [Patch v2 5/9] perf/x86/intel: Drop LBR entries whose privilege level mismatches br_sel Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09 5:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 9:40 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09 14:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10 1:57 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09 5:02 ` [Patch v2 6/9] perf/x86/intel: Validate return value of intel_pmu_init_hybrid() Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09 5:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 9:44 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-10 8:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10 8:34 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09 5:02 ` [Patch v2 7/9] perf/x86/intel: Drop fixed-counter PEBS constraints for baseline PEBS Dapeng Mi
2026-06-10 8:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10 8:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10 8:50 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-10 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-10 11:42 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-10 22:22 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-06-09 5:02 ` [Patch v2 8/9] perf/core: Fix kernel register info leak via hardware skid Dapeng Mi
2026-06-10 9:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-06-11 6:17 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-06-09 5:02 ` [Patch v2 9/9] perf/core: Check kernel access when kernel callchains are requested Dapeng Mi
2026-06-09 5:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 9:49 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260610222209.GF48970@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox