From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Grapentin <gra@linux.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Friedrich Welter <fritz@linux.ibm.com>,
Gautam Gala <ggala@linux.ibm.com>,
Hariharan Mari <hari55@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>,
Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <oss@nina.schoetterlglausch.eu>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/27] KVM: S390: Prepare gmap for a second KVM implementation
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 14:33:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b7bb3d0-dd39-440d-b006-b892dcaebcb2@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706085229.979525-16-seiden@linux.ibm.com>
On 7/6/26 10:52, Steffen Eiden wrote:
> Refactor gmap code such that a second s390 (host) KVM implementation can
> use the gmap code as well. Move relevant definitions into the shared
> kvm_host.h. Move mmu code from s390 to gmap so the other KVM
> implementation can use it as well.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 9 ++
> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host_s390.h | 11 +-
> arch/s390/kvm/gmap/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/s390/kvm/gmap/faultin.c | 1 -
> arch/s390/kvm/gmap/gmap.c | 5 -
> arch/s390/kvm/gmap/gmap.h | 15 ++
> arch/s390/kvm/gmap/mmu.c | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/s390/kvm/s390/s390.c | 134 ++----------------
> arch/s390/kvm/s390/s390.h | 16 +++
> 9 files changed, 245 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/s390/kvm/gmap/mmu.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index e76ceee11ef5..33af8842a71c 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -5,4 +5,13 @@
>
> #include <asm/kvm_host_s390.h>
>
> +#define PGM_PROTECTION 0x04
> +#define PGM_ADDRESSING 0x05
> +#define PGM_SEGMENT_TRANSLATION 0x10
> +#define PGM_PAGE_TRANSLATION 0x11
> +#define PGM_ASCE_TYPE 0x38
> +#define PGM_REGION_FIRST_TRANS 0x39
> +#define PGM_REGION_SECOND_TRANS 0x3a
> +#define PGM_REGION_THIRD_TRANS 0x3b
Before we go out and do funny stuff like this I'd much rather have it
all in one file even though the arm code won't use most of the PGMs.
Either we keep all of it in kvm_host.h or we move it out entirely into
ptrace.h if the s390 kernel team doesn't complain.
I don't think this change belongs in this patch anyway.
[...]
> -bool kvm_arch_setup_async_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #include "trace-gmap.h"
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gmap/gmap.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gmap/gmap.c
> index 8773aa34f107..a04e0a4355a0 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gmap/gmap.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gmap/gmap.c
> @@ -24,11 +24,6 @@
> #include "s390.h"
> #include "faultin.h"
>
> -static inline bool kvm_s390_is_in_sie(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - return vcpu->arch.sie_block->prog0c & PROG_IN_SIE;
> -}
> -
With a small modification we can re-use this in vsie.c and throw it into
kvm_host.h before we move it into kvm_host_s390.h. Make it work on sblks
instead of vcpus and name it something like kvm_s390_sblk_is_in_sie().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 8:52 [PATCH v4 00/27] KVM: s390: Introduce arm64 KVM Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 01/27] VFIO: take reference to the KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 19:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-06 21:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-07-07 7:39 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 02/27] KVM, vfio: remove symbol_get(kvm_get_kvm_safe) from vfio Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 03/27] KVM, vfio: remove symbol_get(kvm_put_kvm) " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 04/27] KVM: Make device name configurable Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 05/27] KVM: Remove KVM_MMIO as config option Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 20:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 06/27] arm64: Use proper include variant Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 07/27] arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 headers with s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 21:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 08/27] KVM: arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 code " Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 21:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-07 7:20 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 09/27] KVM: arm64: Access elements of vcpu_gp_regs individually Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 17:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 10/27] KVM: arm64: Refactor core-reset into a separate function Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 11/27] s390: Use arm64 headers Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 12/27] KVM: s390: Use arm64 code Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 13/27] KVM: s390: Prepare KVM/s390 for a second KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 14/27] KVM: s390: Move s390 kvm code into a subdirectory Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 15/27] KVM: S390: Prepare gmap for a second KVM implementation Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 12:33 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 16/27] KVM: s390: gmap: Refactor storage key and CMMA code into separate files Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 17/27] KVM: s390: Refactor prefix handling into a separate file Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 18/27] KVM: s390: Prepare kvm-s390 for a second kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 19/27] s390: Introduce Start Arm Execution instruction Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:17 ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 11:30 ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-06 11:58 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:53 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 20/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Introduce host definitions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 21/27] s390/hwcaps: Report SAE support as hwcap Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 11:50 ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 22/27] KVM: s390: Add basic arm64 kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 23/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement required functions Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 9:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 12:15 ` Janosch Frank
2026-07-06 20:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 24/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vm/vcpu create destroy Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 15:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-08 6:51 ` Steffen Eiden
2026-07-08 7:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 25/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vCPU IOCTLs Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 10:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 26/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement basic page fault handler Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:52 ` [PATCH v4 27/27] KVM: s390: arm64: Enable KVM_ARM64 config and Kbuild Steffen Eiden
2026-07-06 10:07 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b7bb3d0-dd39-440d-b006-b892dcaebcb2@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brueckner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=fritz@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ggala@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gra@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hari55@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oss@nina.schoetterlglausch.eu \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox