Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] firmware: arm_ffa: check pkvm initailised when initailise ffa driver

[Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>]

[+Seb for the pKVM FFA bits]

On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 10:25:29AM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 12:12:44PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 18 Apr 2026 11:34:30 +0100,
> > > > Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > @@ -2035,6 +2037,16 @@ static int __init ffa_init(void)
> > > > > > >  	u32 buf_sz;
> > > > > > >  	size_t rxtx_bufsz = SZ_4K;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +	/*
> > > > > > > +	 * When pKVM is enabled, the FF-A driver must be initialized
> > > > > > > +	 * after pKVM initialization. Otherwise, pKVM cannot negotiate
> > > > > > > +	 * the FF-A version or obtain RX/TX buffer information,
> > > > > > > +	 * which leads to failures in FF-A calls.
> > > > > > > +	 */
> > > > > > > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM) && is_protected_kvm_enabled() &&
> > > > > > > +	    !is_kvm_arm_initialised())
> > > > > > > +		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That's still fundamentally wrong: pkvm is not ready until
> > > > > > finalize_pkvm() has finished, and that's not indicated by
> > > > > > is_kvm_arm_initialised().
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks. I miss the TSC bit set in here.
> > > >
> > > > That's the least of the problems. None of the infrastructure is in
> > > > place at this stage...
> > > >
> > > > > IMHO, I'd like to make an new state check function --
> > > > > is_pkvm_arm_initialised() so that ff-a driver to know whether
> > > > > pkvm is initialised.
> > > >
> > > > Doesn't sound great, TBH.
> > > >
> > > > > or any other suggestion?
> > > >
> > > > Instead of adding more esoteric predicates, I'd rather you build on an
> > > > existing infrastructure. You have a dependency on KVM, use something
> > > > that is designed to enforce dependencies. Device links spring to mind
> > > > as something designed for that.
> > > >
> > > > Can you look into enabling this for KVM? If that's possible, then it
> > > > should be easy enough to delay the actual KVM registration after pKVM
> > > > is finalised.
> > >
> > > or what about some event notifier? Just like:
> >
> > This seems a bit over-engineered to me. Why don't you just split the
> > FF-A initialisation into two steps: an early part which does the version
> > negotiation and then a later part which can fit in with whatever
> > dependencies you have on the TPM?
> 
> Sorry, I may have misunderstood your suggestion and
> I might be in missing your point.
> 
> But, The issue here is that FFA_VERSION, FFA_RXTX_MAP, and
> FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET, which are invoked from ffa_init()
> as part of early initialisation, must be trapped by pKVM.
> 
> In other words, even the early part of the initialization,
> including version negotiation, needs to happen after pKVM
> is initialized.
> 
> Because of this dependency, simply splitting the FF-A
> initialization into two phases within the driver does not
> seem sufficient, as it still requires knowing when pKVM
> has been initialized.
> 
> Am I missing something?

Ah sorry, I mixed up the ordering of 'module_init' vs 'rootfs_initcall'
and thought you wanted to probe the version earlier. But then I'm still
confused because, prior to 0e0546eabcd6 ("firmware: arm_ffa: Change
initcall level of ffa_init() to rootfs_initcall"), ffa_init() was a
'device_initcall' which is still called earlier than finalize_pkvm().

Will