From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] file as directory
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 12:39:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070523113925.GT4095@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1HqoGh-0001kd-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
> When the real superblock is created. It could even be the _same_
> super block as the real one. There'd be just the problem of anchoring
> the dir-on-file dentries somewhere...
>
> Or with fuse the dir-on-file mount can just come from any mounted
> filesystem, again possibly the same one as the parent. I do actually
> test with this. The userspace filesystem supplies a file descriptor,
> from which the struct path is extracted and returned from ->enter().
Then I do not understand what this mechanism could be used for, other
than an odd way to twist POSIX behaviour and see how much of the userland
would survive that. Certainly not useful for your "look into tarball
as a tree", unless you seriously want to scan the entire damn fs for
tarballs at mount time and set up a superblock for each. And for per-file
extended attributes/forks/whatever-you-call-that-abomination it also
obviously doesn't help, since you lose them for directories.
IOW, what uses do you have in mind? Complete scenario, please...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-23 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-22 18:48 [RFC PATCH] file as directory Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-22 22:10 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 6:36 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 7:03 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 7:19 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 7:36 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 8:05 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 8:29 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 9:03 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 9:58 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 10:14 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 9:16 ` Jan Blunck
2007-05-23 9:28 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 12:34 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-23 12:40 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 9:21 ` Jan Blunck
2007-05-23 9:35 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-24 12:07 ` Pavel Machek
2007-05-28 14:43 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-22 23:26 ` Shaya Potter
2007-05-23 6:39 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 9:51 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 10:09 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 10:24 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 10:24 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 10:40 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 11:39 ` Al Viro [this message]
2007-05-23 12:16 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 13:01 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 13:51 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 14:32 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 15:06 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 15:25 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 15:37 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 15:55 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 13:23 ` Ph. Marek
2007-05-23 13:54 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 12:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-23 13:20 ` Jaroslav Sykora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070523113925.GT4095@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox