From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] file as directory
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 16:37:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070523153718.GB4095@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1Hqsij-000338-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 05:25:49PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > How will this work with copy_tree() and namespace duplication, which
> > > currently walk the tree with only namespace_sem held?
> >
> > Easy - grab namespace_sem, grab vfsmount_lock, walk the subtree and bump
> > mnt_busy on everything (by 1 + number of non-busy children). Then drop
> > vfsmount_lock and do as usual, dropping references in tree being copied
> > as you go. Nothing will get attached or detached due to namespace_sem,
> > nothing will get evicted by anybody other than you since you've got all
> > that stuff pinned down. End of story...
>
> Right.
>
> Do you have some code?
>
> Should I try to code something up?
I hope to get some breathing space next week, then I'll get back to
VFS work. I'd rather do that one myself, since it'll be a long series
of equivalent transformations - debugging such rewrite of refcounting
done as a single patch is going to be hell. And yes, refcounting rewrite
is near the top of the list (another thing is wading through several
threads from hell and reviewing unionfs ;-/)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-23 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-22 18:48 [RFC PATCH] file as directory Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-22 22:10 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 6:36 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 7:03 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 7:19 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 7:36 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 8:05 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 8:29 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 9:03 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 9:58 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 10:14 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 9:16 ` Jan Blunck
2007-05-23 9:28 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 12:34 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-23 12:40 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 9:21 ` Jan Blunck
2007-05-23 9:35 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-24 12:07 ` Pavel Machek
2007-05-28 14:43 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-22 23:26 ` Shaya Potter
2007-05-23 6:39 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 9:51 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 10:09 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 10:24 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 10:24 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 10:40 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 11:39 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 12:16 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 13:01 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 13:51 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 14:32 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 15:06 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 15:25 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 15:37 ` Al Viro [this message]
2007-05-23 15:55 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-05-23 13:23 ` Ph. Marek
2007-05-23 13:54 ` Al Viro
2007-05-23 12:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-23 13:20 ` Jaroslav Sykora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070523153718.GB4095@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox