From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
x86@kernel.org, x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/29] x86/cacheinfo: Standardize _cpuid4_info_regs instance naming
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:47:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250317164745.4754-11-darwi@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250317164745.4754-1-darwi@linutronix.de>
The cacheinfo code frequently uses the output registers from CPUID leaf
0x4. Such registers are cached at struct _cpuid4_info_regs, augmented
with related information, and are then passed across functions.
The naming of these _cpuid4_info_regs instances is confusing at best.
Some instances are called "this_leaf", which is vague as "this" lacks
context and "leaf" is overly generic given that other CPUID leaves are
also processed within cacheinfo. Other _cpuid4_info_regs instances are
just called "base", adding further ambiguity.
Standardize on id4 for all instances.
Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
index 3b97e475b09d..06de593e75e1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ cache_get_priv_group(struct cacheinfo *ci)
return &cache_private_group;
}
-static void amd_init_l3_cache(struct _cpuid4_info_regs *this_leaf, int index)
+static void amd_init_l3_cache(struct _cpuid4_info_regs *id4, int index)
{
int node;
@@ -582,16 +582,16 @@ static void amd_init_l3_cache(struct _cpuid4_info_regs *this_leaf, int index)
return;
node = topology_amd_node_id(smp_processor_id());
- this_leaf->nb = node_to_amd_nb(node);
- if (this_leaf->nb && !this_leaf->nb->l3_cache.indices)
- amd_calc_l3_indices(this_leaf->nb);
+ id4->nb = node_to_amd_nb(node);
+ if (id4->nb && !id4->nb->l3_cache.indices)
+ amd_calc_l3_indices(id4->nb);
}
#else
#define amd_init_l3_cache(x, y)
#endif /* CONFIG_AMD_NB && CONFIG_SYSFS */
static int
-cpuid4_cache_lookup_regs(int index, struct _cpuid4_info_regs *this_leaf)
+cpuid4_cache_lookup_regs(int index, struct _cpuid4_info_regs *id4)
{
union _cpuid4_leaf_eax eax;
union _cpuid4_leaf_ebx ebx;
@@ -604,11 +604,11 @@ cpuid4_cache_lookup_regs(int index, struct _cpuid4_info_regs *this_leaf)
&ebx.full, &ecx.full, &edx);
else
amd_cpuid4(index, &eax, &ebx, &ecx);
- amd_init_l3_cache(this_leaf, index);
+ amd_init_l3_cache(id4, index);
} else if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON) {
cpuid_count(0x8000001d, index, &eax.full,
&ebx.full, &ecx.full, &edx);
- amd_init_l3_cache(this_leaf, index);
+ amd_init_l3_cache(id4, index);
} else {
cpuid_count(4, index, &eax.full, &ebx.full, &ecx.full, &edx);
}
@@ -616,13 +616,14 @@ cpuid4_cache_lookup_regs(int index, struct _cpuid4_info_regs *this_leaf)
if (eax.split.type == CTYPE_NULL)
return -EIO; /* better error ? */
- this_leaf->eax = eax;
- this_leaf->ebx = ebx;
- this_leaf->ecx = ecx;
- this_leaf->size = (ecx.split.number_of_sets + 1) *
- (ebx.split.coherency_line_size + 1) *
- (ebx.split.physical_line_partition + 1) *
- (ebx.split.ways_of_associativity + 1);
+ id4->eax = eax;
+ id4->ebx = ebx;
+ id4->ecx = ecx;
+ id4->size = (ecx.split.number_of_sets + 1) *
+ (ebx.split.coherency_line_size + 1) *
+ (ebx.split.physical_line_partition + 1) *
+ (ebx.split.ways_of_associativity + 1);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -753,29 +754,29 @@ void init_intel_cacheinfo(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
* parameters cpuid leaf to find the cache details
*/
for (i = 0; i < ci->num_leaves; i++) {
- struct _cpuid4_info_regs this_leaf = {};
+ struct _cpuid4_info_regs id4 = {};
int retval;
- retval = cpuid4_cache_lookup_regs(i, &this_leaf);
+ retval = cpuid4_cache_lookup_regs(i, &id4);
if (retval < 0)
continue;
- switch (this_leaf.eax.split.level) {
+ switch (id4.eax.split.level) {
case 1:
- if (this_leaf.eax.split.type == CTYPE_DATA)
- new_l1d = this_leaf.size/1024;
- else if (this_leaf.eax.split.type == CTYPE_INST)
- new_l1i = this_leaf.size/1024;
+ if (id4.eax.split.type == CTYPE_DATA)
+ new_l1d = id4.size/1024;
+ else if (id4.eax.split.type == CTYPE_INST)
+ new_l1i = id4.size/1024;
break;
case 2:
- new_l2 = this_leaf.size/1024;
- num_threads_sharing = 1 + this_leaf.eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
+ new_l2 = id4.size/1024;
+ num_threads_sharing = 1 + id4.eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
index_msb = get_count_order(num_threads_sharing);
l2_id = c->topo.apicid & ~((1 << index_msb) - 1);
break;
case 3:
- new_l3 = this_leaf.size/1024;
- num_threads_sharing = 1 + this_leaf.eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
+ new_l3 = id4.size/1024;
+ num_threads_sharing = 1 + id4.eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
index_msb = get_count_order(num_threads_sharing);
l3_id = c->topo.apicid & ~((1 << index_msb) - 1);
break;
@@ -840,7 +841,7 @@ void init_intel_cacheinfo(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
}
static int __cache_amd_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index,
- const struct _cpuid4_info_regs *base)
+ const struct _cpuid4_info_regs *id4)
{
struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci;
struct cacheinfo *ci;
@@ -866,7 +867,7 @@ static int __cache_amd_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index,
} else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)) {
unsigned int apicid, nshared, first, last;
- nshared = base->eax.split.num_threads_sharing + 1;
+ nshared = id4->eax.split.num_threads_sharing + 1;
apicid = cpu_data(cpu).topo.apicid;
first = apicid - (apicid % nshared);
last = first + nshared - 1;
@@ -897,7 +898,7 @@ static int __cache_amd_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index,
}
static void __cache_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index,
- const struct _cpuid4_info_regs *base)
+ const struct _cpuid4_info_regs *id4)
{
struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
struct cacheinfo *ci, *sibling_ci;
@@ -906,12 +907,12 @@ static void __cache_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index,
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
if (x86_vendor_amd_or_hygon(c->x86_vendor)) {
- if (__cache_amd_cpumap_setup(cpu, index, base))
+ if (__cache_amd_cpumap_setup(cpu, index, id4))
return;
}
ci = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
- num_threads_sharing = 1 + base->eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
+ num_threads_sharing = 1 + id4->eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &ci->shared_cpu_map);
if (num_threads_sharing == 1)
@@ -932,18 +933,18 @@ static void __cache_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index,
}
static void ci_info_init(struct cacheinfo *ci,
- const struct _cpuid4_info_regs *base)
+ const struct _cpuid4_info_regs *id4)
{
- ci->id = base->id;
+ ci->id = id4->id;
ci->attributes = CACHE_ID;
- ci->level = base->eax.split.level;
- ci->type = cache_type_map[base->eax.split.type];
- ci->coherency_line_size = base->ebx.split.coherency_line_size + 1;
- ci->ways_of_associativity = base->ebx.split.ways_of_associativity + 1;
- ci->size = base->size;
- ci->number_of_sets = base->ecx.split.number_of_sets + 1;
- ci->physical_line_partition = base->ebx.split.physical_line_partition + 1;
- ci->priv = base->nb;
+ ci->level = id4->eax.split.level;
+ ci->type = cache_type_map[id4->eax.split.type];
+ ci->coherency_line_size = id4->ebx.split.coherency_line_size + 1;
+ ci->ways_of_associativity = id4->ebx.split.ways_of_associativity + 1;
+ ci->size = id4->size;
+ ci->number_of_sets = id4->ecx.split.number_of_sets + 1;
+ ci->physical_line_partition = id4->ebx.split.physical_line_partition + 1;
+ ci->priv = id4->nb;
}
int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
@@ -962,15 +963,15 @@ int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
* ECX as cache index. Then right shift apicid by the number's order to get
* cache id for this cache node.
*/
-static void get_cache_id(int cpu, struct _cpuid4_info_regs *id4_regs)
+static void get_cache_id(int cpu, struct _cpuid4_info_regs *id4)
{
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
unsigned long num_threads_sharing;
int index_msb;
- num_threads_sharing = 1 + id4_regs->eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
+ num_threads_sharing = 1 + id4->eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
index_msb = get_count_order(num_threads_sharing);
- id4_regs->id = c->topo.apicid >> index_msb;
+ id4->id = c->topo.apicid >> index_msb;
}
int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu)
@@ -978,15 +979,15 @@ int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu)
unsigned int idx, ret;
struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
struct cacheinfo *ci = this_cpu_ci->info_list;
- struct _cpuid4_info_regs id4_regs = {};
+ struct _cpuid4_info_regs id4 = {};
for (idx = 0; idx < this_cpu_ci->num_leaves; idx++) {
- ret = cpuid4_cache_lookup_regs(idx, &id4_regs);
+ ret = cpuid4_cache_lookup_regs(idx, &id4);
if (ret)
return ret;
- get_cache_id(cpu, &id4_regs);
- ci_info_init(ci++, &id4_regs);
- __cache_cpumap_setup(cpu, idx, &id4_regs);
+ get_cache_id(cpu, &id4);
+ ci_info_init(ci++, &id4);
+ __cache_cpumap_setup(cpu, idx, &id4);
}
this_cpu_ci->cpu_map_populated = true;
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-17 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-17 16:47 [PATCH v2 00/29] x86: Leaf 0x2 and leaf 0x4 refactorings Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/29] x86: treewide: Introduce x86_vendor_amd_or_hygon() Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 17:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-17 17:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-17 18:10 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-03-17 18:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-17 18:11 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-17 18:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-17 18:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-18 11:07 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 14:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-20 10:47 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 21:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-17 21:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/29] x86/cpuid: Refactor <asm/cpuid.h> Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/29] x86/cpu: Remove leaf 0x2 parsing loop and add helpers Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 21:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-18 11:09 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use CPUID leaf 0x2 parsing helpers Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/29] x86/cacheinfo: Refactor leaf 0x2 cache descriptor lookup Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/29] x86/cacheinfo: Properly name amd_cpuid4()'s first parameter Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use proper name for cacheinfo instances Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/29] x86/cacheinfo: Constify _cpuid4_info_regs instances Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/29] x86/cacheinfo: Align ci_info_init() assignment expressions Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` Ahmed S. Darwish [this message]
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/29] x86/cacheinfo: Consolidate AMD/Hygon leaf 0x8000001d calls Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/29] x86/cacheinfo: Separate amd_northbridge from _cpuid4_info_regs Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 13/29] x86/cacheinfo: Move AMD cache_disable_0/1 handling to separate file Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 14/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use sysfs_emit() for sysfs attributes show() Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 15/29] x86/cacheinfo: Separate Intel and AMD leaf 0x4 code paths Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 16/29] x86/cacheinfo: Rename _cpuid4_info_regs to _cpuid4_info Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 17/29] x86/cacheinfo: Clarify type markers for leaf 0x2 cache descriptors Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 18/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use enums for cache descriptor types Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 14:11 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-19 16:09 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 19/29] x86/cpu: Use enums for TLB " Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 16:09 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-19 16:16 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 20/29] x86/cpu: Consolidate CPUID leaf 0x2 tables Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 21/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use consolidated leaf 0x2 descriptor table Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 22/29] x86/cpu: " Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 23/29] x86/cacheinfo: Separate leaf 0x2 handling and post-processing logic Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 24/29] x86/cacheinfo: Separate Intel leaf 0x4 handling Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 25/29] x86/cacheinfo: Extract out cache level topology ID calculation Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 26/29] x86/cacheinfo: Extract out cache self-snoop checks Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 27/29] x86/cacheinfo: Relocate leaf 0x4 cache_type mapping Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 28/29] x86/cacheinfo: Introduce cpuid_amd_hygon_has_l3_cache() Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 29/29] x86/cacheinfo: Apply maintainer-tip coding style fixes Ahmed S. Darwish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250317164745.4754-11-darwi@linutronix.de \
--to=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox