From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
x86@kernel.org, x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 24/29] x86/cacheinfo: Separate Intel leaf 0x4 handling
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:47:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250317164745.4754-25-darwi@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250317164745.4754-1-darwi@linutronix.de>
init_intel_cacheinfo() was overly complex. It parsed leaf 0x4 data,
leaf 0x2 data, and performed post-processing, all within one function.
Parent commit moved leaf 0x2 parsing and the post-processing logic into
their own functions.
Continue the refactoring by extracting leaf 0x4 parsing into its own
function. Initialize local L2/L3 topology ID variables to BAD_APICID by
default, thus ensuring they can be used unconditionally.
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
index 9b29842b20db..f1db8182deeb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
@@ -397,73 +397,71 @@ static void intel_cacheinfo_0x2(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
intel_cacheinfo_done(c, l3, l2, l1i, l1d);
}
-void init_intel_cacheinfo(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+static bool intel_cacheinfo_0x4(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
struct cpu_cacheinfo *ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(c->cpu_index);
- unsigned int l1i = 0, l1d = 0, l2 = 0, l3 = 0;
- unsigned int l2_id = 0, l3_id = 0;
-
- if (c->cpuid_level > 3) {
- /*
- * There should be at least one leaf. A non-zero value means
- * that the number of leaves has been initialized.
- */
- if (!ci->num_leaves)
- ci->num_leaves = find_num_cache_leaves(c);
+ unsigned int l2_id = BAD_APICID, l3_id = BAD_APICID;
+ unsigned int l1d = 0, l1i = 0, l2 = 0, l3 = 0;
- /*
- * Whenever possible use cpuid(4), deterministic cache
- * parameters cpuid leaf to find the cache details
- */
- for (int i = 0; i < ci->num_leaves; i++) {
- unsigned int num_threads_sharing, index_msb;
- struct _cpuid4_info id4 = {};
- int retval;
+ if (c->cpuid_level < 4)
+ return false;
- retval = intel_fill_cpuid4_info(i, &id4);
- if (retval < 0)
- continue;
+ /*
+ * There should be at least one leaf. A non-zero value means
+ * that the number of leaves has been previously initialized.
+ */
+ if (!ci->num_leaves)
+ ci->num_leaves = find_num_cache_leaves(c);
- switch (id4.eax.split.level) {
- case 1:
- if (id4.eax.split.type == CTYPE_DATA)
- l1d = id4.size / 1024;
- else if (id4.eax.split.type == CTYPE_INST)
- l1i = id4.size / 1024;
- break;
- case 2:
- l2 = id4.size / 1024;
- num_threads_sharing = 1 + id4.eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
- index_msb = get_count_order(num_threads_sharing);
- l2_id = c->topo.apicid & ~((1 << index_msb) - 1);
- break;
- case 3:
- l3 = id4.size / 1024;
- num_threads_sharing = 1 + id4.eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
- index_msb = get_count_order(num_threads_sharing);
- l3_id = c->topo.apicid & ~((1 << index_msb) - 1);
- break;
- default:
- break;
- }
+ if (!ci->num_leaves)
+ return false;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < ci->num_leaves; i++) {
+ unsigned int num_threads_sharing, index_msb;
+ struct _cpuid4_info id4 = {};
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = intel_fill_cpuid4_info(i, &id4);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ continue;
+
+ switch (id4.eax.split.level) {
+ case 1:
+ if (id4.eax.split.type == CTYPE_DATA)
+ l1d = id4.size / 1024;
+ else if (id4.eax.split.type == CTYPE_INST)
+ l1i = id4.size / 1024;
+ break;
+ case 2:
+ l2 = id4.size / 1024;
+ num_threads_sharing = 1 + id4.eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
+ index_msb = get_count_order(num_threads_sharing);
+ l2_id = c->topo.apicid & ~((1 << index_msb) - 1);
+ break;
+ case 3:
+ l3 = id4.size / 1024;
+ num_threads_sharing = 1 + id4.eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
+ index_msb = get_count_order(num_threads_sharing);
+ l3_id = c->topo.apicid & ~((1 << index_msb) - 1);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
}
}
+ c->topo.l2c_id = l2_id;
+ c->topo.llc_id = (l3_id == BAD_APICID) ? l2_id : l3_id;
+ intel_cacheinfo_done(c, l3, l2, l1i, l1d);
+ return true;
+}
+
+void init_intel_cacheinfo(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
/* Don't use CPUID(2) if CPUID(4) is supported. */
- if (!ci->num_leaves && c->cpuid_level > 1) {
- intel_cacheinfo_0x2(c);
+ if (intel_cacheinfo_0x4(c))
return;
- }
-
- if (l2) {
- c->topo.llc_id = l2_id;
- c->topo.l2c_id = l2_id;
- }
-
- if (l3)
- c->topo.llc_id = l3_id;
- intel_cacheinfo_done(c, l3, l2, l1i, l1d);
+ intel_cacheinfo_0x2(c);
}
static int __cache_amd_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index,
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-17 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-17 16:47 [PATCH v2 00/29] x86: Leaf 0x2 and leaf 0x4 refactorings Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/29] x86: treewide: Introduce x86_vendor_amd_or_hygon() Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 17:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-17 17:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-17 18:10 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-03-17 18:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-17 18:11 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-17 18:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-17 18:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-18 11:07 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 14:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-20 10:47 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 21:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-17 21:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/29] x86/cpuid: Refactor <asm/cpuid.h> Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/29] x86/cpu: Remove leaf 0x2 parsing loop and add helpers Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 21:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-18 11:09 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use CPUID leaf 0x2 parsing helpers Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/29] x86/cacheinfo: Refactor leaf 0x2 cache descriptor lookup Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/29] x86/cacheinfo: Properly name amd_cpuid4()'s first parameter Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use proper name for cacheinfo instances Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/29] x86/cacheinfo: Constify _cpuid4_info_regs instances Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/29] x86/cacheinfo: Align ci_info_init() assignment expressions Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/29] x86/cacheinfo: Standardize _cpuid4_info_regs instance naming Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/29] x86/cacheinfo: Consolidate AMD/Hygon leaf 0x8000001d calls Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/29] x86/cacheinfo: Separate amd_northbridge from _cpuid4_info_regs Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 13/29] x86/cacheinfo: Move AMD cache_disable_0/1 handling to separate file Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 14/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use sysfs_emit() for sysfs attributes show() Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 15/29] x86/cacheinfo: Separate Intel and AMD leaf 0x4 code paths Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 16/29] x86/cacheinfo: Rename _cpuid4_info_regs to _cpuid4_info Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 17/29] x86/cacheinfo: Clarify type markers for leaf 0x2 cache descriptors Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 18/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use enums for cache descriptor types Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 14:11 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-19 16:09 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 19/29] x86/cpu: Use enums for TLB " Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 16:09 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-19 16:16 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 20/29] x86/cpu: Consolidate CPUID leaf 0x2 tables Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 21/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use consolidated leaf 0x2 descriptor table Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 22/29] x86/cpu: " Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 23/29] x86/cacheinfo: Separate leaf 0x2 handling and post-processing logic Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` Ahmed S. Darwish [this message]
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 25/29] x86/cacheinfo: Extract out cache level topology ID calculation Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 26/29] x86/cacheinfo: Extract out cache self-snoop checks Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 27/29] x86/cacheinfo: Relocate leaf 0x4 cache_type mapping Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 28/29] x86/cacheinfo: Introduce cpuid_amd_hygon_has_l3_cache() Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 29/29] x86/cacheinfo: Apply maintainer-tip coding style fixes Ahmed S. Darwish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250317164745.4754-25-darwi@linutronix.de \
--to=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox