The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use proper name for cacheinfo instances
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:47:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250317164745.4754-8-darwi@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250317164745.4754-1-darwi@linutronix.de>

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The cacheinfo structure defined at <include/linux/cacheinfo.h> is a
generic cache info object representation.

Calling its instances at x86 cacheinfo.c "leaf" confuses it with a CPUID
leaf -- especially that multiple CPUID calls are already sprinkled across
that file.  Most of such instances also have a redundant "this_" prefix.

Rename all of the cacheinfo "this_leaf" instances to just "ci".

[ darwi: Move into separate commit and write commit log ]

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwi@linutronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
index 64effa2d7674..2656f37ef536 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c
@@ -349,11 +349,10 @@ static int amd_get_l3_disable_slot(struct amd_northbridge *nb, unsigned slot)
 	return -1;
 }
 
-static ssize_t show_cache_disable(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, char *buf,
-				  unsigned int slot)
+static ssize_t show_cache_disable(struct cacheinfo *ci, char *buf, unsigned int slot)
 {
 	int index;
-	struct amd_northbridge *nb = this_leaf->priv;
+	struct amd_northbridge *nb = ci->priv;
 
 	index = amd_get_l3_disable_slot(nb, slot);
 	if (index >= 0)
@@ -367,8 +366,8 @@ static ssize_t								\
 cache_disable_##slot##_show(struct device *dev,				\
 			    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)	\
 {									\
-	struct cacheinfo *this_leaf = dev_get_drvdata(dev);		\
-	return show_cache_disable(this_leaf, buf, slot);		\
+	struct cacheinfo *ci = dev_get_drvdata(dev);			\
+	return show_cache_disable(ci, buf, slot);			\
 }
 SHOW_CACHE_DISABLE(0)
 SHOW_CACHE_DISABLE(1)
@@ -435,18 +434,17 @@ static int amd_set_l3_disable_slot(struct amd_northbridge *nb, int cpu,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static ssize_t store_cache_disable(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
-				   const char *buf, size_t count,
-				   unsigned int slot)
+static ssize_t store_cache_disable(struct cacheinfo *ci, const char *buf,
+				   size_t count, unsigned int slot)
 {
 	unsigned long val = 0;
 	int cpu, err = 0;
-	struct amd_northbridge *nb = this_leaf->priv;
+	struct amd_northbridge *nb = ci->priv;
 
 	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	cpu = cpumask_first(&this_leaf->shared_cpu_map);
+	cpu = cpumask_first(&ci->shared_cpu_map);
 
 	if (kstrtoul(buf, 10, &val) < 0)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -467,8 +465,8 @@ cache_disable_##slot##_store(struct device *dev,			\
 			     struct device_attribute *attr,		\
 			     const char *buf, size_t count)		\
 {									\
-	struct cacheinfo *this_leaf = dev_get_drvdata(dev);		\
-	return store_cache_disable(this_leaf, buf, count, slot);	\
+	struct cacheinfo *ci = dev_get_drvdata(dev);			\
+	return store_cache_disable(ci, buf, count, slot);		\
 }
 STORE_CACHE_DISABLE(0)
 STORE_CACHE_DISABLE(1)
@@ -476,8 +474,8 @@ STORE_CACHE_DISABLE(1)
 static ssize_t subcaches_show(struct device *dev,
 			      struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
-	struct cacheinfo *this_leaf = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-	int cpu = cpumask_first(&this_leaf->shared_cpu_map);
+	struct cacheinfo *ci = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int cpu = cpumask_first(&ci->shared_cpu_map);
 
 	return sprintf(buf, "%x\n", amd_get_subcaches(cpu));
 }
@@ -486,8 +484,8 @@ static ssize_t subcaches_store(struct device *dev,
 			       struct device_attribute *attr,
 			       const char *buf, size_t count)
 {
-	struct cacheinfo *this_leaf = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-	int cpu = cpumask_first(&this_leaf->shared_cpu_map);
+	struct cacheinfo *ci = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int cpu = cpumask_first(&ci->shared_cpu_map);
 	unsigned long val;
 
 	if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
@@ -511,10 +509,10 @@ cache_private_attrs_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
 			       struct attribute *attr, int unused)
 {
 	struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
-	struct cacheinfo *this_leaf = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	struct cacheinfo *ci = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	umode_t mode = attr->mode;
 
-	if (!this_leaf->priv)
+	if (!ci->priv)
 		return 0;
 
 	if ((attr == &dev_attr_subcaches.attr) &&
@@ -562,11 +560,11 @@ static void init_amd_l3_attrs(void)
 }
 
 const struct attribute_group *
-cache_get_priv_group(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf)
+cache_get_priv_group(struct cacheinfo *ci)
 {
-	struct amd_northbridge *nb = this_leaf->priv;
+	struct amd_northbridge *nb = ci->priv;
 
-	if (this_leaf->level < 3 || !nb)
+	if (ci->level < 3 || !nb)
 		return NULL;
 
 	if (nb && nb->l3_cache.indices)
@@ -845,7 +843,7 @@ static int __cache_amd_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index,
 				    struct _cpuid4_info_regs *base)
 {
 	struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci;
-	struct cacheinfo *this_leaf;
+	struct cacheinfo *ci;
 	int i, sibling;
 
 	/*
@@ -857,12 +855,12 @@ static int __cache_amd_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index,
 			this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(i);
 			if (!this_cpu_ci->info_list)
 				continue;
-			this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
+			ci = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
 			for_each_cpu(sibling, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu)) {
 				if (!cpu_online(sibling))
 					continue;
 				cpumask_set_cpu(sibling,
-						&this_leaf->shared_cpu_map);
+						&ci->shared_cpu_map);
 			}
 		}
 	} else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)) {
@@ -882,14 +880,14 @@ static int __cache_amd_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index,
 			if ((apicid < first) || (apicid > last))
 				continue;
 
-			this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
+			ci = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
 
 			for_each_online_cpu(sibling) {
 				apicid = cpu_data(sibling).topo.apicid;
 				if ((apicid < first) || (apicid > last))
 					continue;
 				cpumask_set_cpu(sibling,
-						&this_leaf->shared_cpu_map);
+						&ci->shared_cpu_map);
 			}
 		}
 	} else
@@ -902,7 +900,7 @@ static void __cache_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index,
 				 struct _cpuid4_info_regs *base)
 {
 	struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
-	struct cacheinfo *this_leaf, *sibling_leaf;
+	struct cacheinfo *ci, *sibling_ci;
 	unsigned long num_threads_sharing;
 	int index_msb, i;
 	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
@@ -912,10 +910,10 @@ static void __cache_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index,
 			return;
 	}
 
-	this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
+	ci = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
 	num_threads_sharing = 1 + base->eax.split.num_threads_sharing;
 
-	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &this_leaf->shared_cpu_map);
+	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &ci->shared_cpu_map);
 	if (num_threads_sharing == 1)
 		return;
 
@@ -927,28 +925,27 @@ static void __cache_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index,
 
 			if (i == cpu || !sib_cpu_ci->info_list)
 				continue;/* skip if itself or no cacheinfo */
-			sibling_leaf = sib_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
-			cpumask_set_cpu(i, &this_leaf->shared_cpu_map);
-			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &sibling_leaf->shared_cpu_map);
+			sibling_ci = sib_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
+			cpumask_set_cpu(i, &ci->shared_cpu_map);
+			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &sibling_ci->shared_cpu_map);
 		}
 }
 
-static void ci_leaf_init(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
-			 struct _cpuid4_info_regs *base)
+static void ci_info_init(struct cacheinfo *ci, struct _cpuid4_info_regs *base)
 {
-	this_leaf->id = base->id;
-	this_leaf->attributes = CACHE_ID;
-	this_leaf->level = base->eax.split.level;
-	this_leaf->type = cache_type_map[base->eax.split.type];
-	this_leaf->coherency_line_size =
+	ci->id = base->id;
+	ci->attributes = CACHE_ID;
+	ci->level = base->eax.split.level;
+	ci->type = cache_type_map[base->eax.split.type];
+	ci->coherency_line_size =
 				base->ebx.split.coherency_line_size + 1;
-	this_leaf->ways_of_associativity =
+	ci->ways_of_associativity =
 				base->ebx.split.ways_of_associativity + 1;
-	this_leaf->size = base->size;
-	this_leaf->number_of_sets = base->ecx.split.number_of_sets + 1;
-	this_leaf->physical_line_partition =
+	ci->size = base->size;
+	ci->number_of_sets = base->ecx.split.number_of_sets + 1;
+	ci->physical_line_partition =
 				base->ebx.split.physical_line_partition + 1;
-	this_leaf->priv = base->nb;
+	ci->priv = base->nb;
 }
 
 int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
@@ -982,7 +979,7 @@ int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	unsigned int idx, ret;
 	struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
-	struct cacheinfo *this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list;
+	struct cacheinfo *ci = this_cpu_ci->info_list;
 	struct _cpuid4_info_regs id4_regs = {};
 
 	for (idx = 0; idx < this_cpu_ci->num_leaves; idx++) {
@@ -990,7 +987,7 @@ int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu)
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 		get_cache_id(cpu, &id4_regs);
-		ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, &id4_regs);
+		ci_info_init(ci++, &id4_regs);
 		__cache_cpumap_setup(cpu, idx, &id4_regs);
 	}
 	this_cpu_ci->cpu_map_populated = true;
-- 
2.48.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-17 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-17 16:47 [PATCH v2 00/29] x86: Leaf 0x2 and leaf 0x4 refactorings Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/29] x86: treewide: Introduce x86_vendor_amd_or_hygon() Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 17:32   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-17 17:48     ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-17 18:10       ` Andrew Cooper
2025-03-17 18:34         ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-17 18:11       ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-17 18:21         ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-17 18:34           ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-18 11:07     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 14:47       ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-20 10:47         ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 21:42   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-17 21:46     ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/29] x86/cpuid: Refactor <asm/cpuid.h> Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/29] x86/cpu: Remove leaf 0x2 parsing loop and add helpers Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 21:36   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-18 11:09     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use CPUID leaf 0x2 parsing helpers Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/29] x86/cacheinfo: Refactor leaf 0x2 cache descriptor lookup Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/29] x86/cacheinfo: Properly name amd_cpuid4()'s first parameter Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` Ahmed S. Darwish [this message]
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/29] x86/cacheinfo: Constify _cpuid4_info_regs instances Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/29] x86/cacheinfo: Align ci_info_init() assignment expressions Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/29] x86/cacheinfo: Standardize _cpuid4_info_regs instance naming Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/29] x86/cacheinfo: Consolidate AMD/Hygon leaf 0x8000001d calls Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/29] x86/cacheinfo: Separate amd_northbridge from _cpuid4_info_regs Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 13/29] x86/cacheinfo: Move AMD cache_disable_0/1 handling to separate file Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 14/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use sysfs_emit() for sysfs attributes show() Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 15/29] x86/cacheinfo: Separate Intel and AMD leaf 0x4 code paths Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 16/29] x86/cacheinfo: Rename _cpuid4_info_regs to _cpuid4_info Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 17/29] x86/cacheinfo: Clarify type markers for leaf 0x2 cache descriptors Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 18/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use enums for cache descriptor types Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 14:11   ` kernel test robot
2025-03-19 16:09     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 19/29] x86/cpu: Use enums for TLB " Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-19 16:09   ` kernel test robot
2025-03-19 16:16     ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 20/29] x86/cpu: Consolidate CPUID leaf 0x2 tables Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 21/29] x86/cacheinfo: Use consolidated leaf 0x2 descriptor table Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 22/29] x86/cpu: " Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 23/29] x86/cacheinfo: Separate leaf 0x2 handling and post-processing logic Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 24/29] x86/cacheinfo: Separate Intel leaf 0x4 handling Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 25/29] x86/cacheinfo: Extract out cache level topology ID calculation Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 26/29] x86/cacheinfo: Extract out cache self-snoop checks Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 27/29] x86/cacheinfo: Relocate leaf 0x4 cache_type mapping Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 28/29] x86/cacheinfo: Introduce cpuid_amd_hygon_has_l3_cache() Ahmed S. Darwish
2025-03-17 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 29/29] x86/cacheinfo: Apply maintainer-tip coding style fixes Ahmed S. Darwish

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250317164745.4754-8-darwi@linutronix.de \
    --to=darwi@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox