From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kees@kernel.org,
acarmina@redhat.com, jpoimboe@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 6/8] x86_64/bug: Implement __WARN_printf()
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 20:09:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250602180922.GC30486@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wiYHv2duN1Aj3E5UD3zH=z6A9YpGJ1Mxj_CWL7_FRMKgw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 09:38:09AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 at 08:50, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, it absolutely builds with clang. The inline asm isn't something we
> > don't already do elsewhere :-) *cough* extable *cough*
>
> Eww. I hadn't looked at that (or repressed it if I did). *Shudder*.
>
> But looking around, I don't think any of the normal code I ever look
> at actually *generate* that disgusting thing.
>
> I had to search for it, and looked at the absolute horror it generates
> in the futex code, and honestly, if I ever have to look at that
> garbage, I would throw up.
>
> And WARN_ONCE() is in stuff I *do* look at.
>
> So no. I'm NAK'ing it just because it makes the asm look entirely unreadable.
>
> And no, I'm not ok with only using 'objdump' and friends to look at
> assembly generation. I want to be able to do
>
> make xyz.s
>
> and look at code generation without throwing up.
>
> The fact that we have this disgusting thing elsewhere in places that
> I've not looked at does *not* excuse adding it to other places.
Right. So the problem is using asm macros in inline-asm. We've tried
adding those macros to a global asm, but IIRC that had trouble.
So yeah, now we do the macro definition and purge right around the
inline asm and then you get this horror show :-(
Anyway, I'll try and come up with something else.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-02 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-02 14:42 [RFC 0/8] x86: Mad WARN() hackery Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 14:42 ` [RFC 1/8] x86: Provide assembly __bug_table helpers Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 14:42 ` [RFC 2/8] bug: Add BUGFLAG_FORMAT infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 14:42 ` [RFC 3/8] bug: Clean up CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 14:42 ` [RFC 4/8] bug: Allow architectures to provide __WARN_printf() Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 14:42 ` [RFC 5/8] x86_64/bug: Add BUG_FORMAT basics Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 14:42 ` [RFC 6/8] x86_64/bug: Implement __WARN_printf() Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 15:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-02 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 16:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-02 18:09 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-06-02 20:04 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-02 20:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-02 20:33 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-06-02 21:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 22:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 23:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-03 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-03 22:23 ` David Laight
2025-06-02 14:42 ` [RFC 7/8] x86/bug: Implement WARN_ONCE() Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 14:42 ` [RFC 8/8] x86: Clean up default rethunk warning Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250602180922.GC30486@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acarmina@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox