From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: jpoimboe@kernel.org
Cc: acarmina@redhat.com, kees@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
peterz@infradead.org, torvalds@linuxfoundation.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 6/8] x86_64/bug: Implement __WARN_printf()
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 21:33:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e592449-7abb-4d41-992b-7fe25f667691@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fm4xl3yt26xbqq3oczrlbbo6ot5t6nelxweuscrbkcialcz6sp@zx57t3jh463g>
> Yeah, IIRC, the problem I ran into was that clang doesn't allow defining
> asm macros in global asm().
Macros in global asm was fixed in Clang 6.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36110
But https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/60792 is still unfixed
and waiting to trip people up.
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-02 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-02 14:42 [RFC 0/8] x86: Mad WARN() hackery Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 14:42 ` [RFC 1/8] x86: Provide assembly __bug_table helpers Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 14:42 ` [RFC 2/8] bug: Add BUGFLAG_FORMAT infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 14:42 ` [RFC 3/8] bug: Clean up CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG_RELATIVE_POINTERS Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 14:42 ` [RFC 4/8] bug: Allow architectures to provide __WARN_printf() Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 14:42 ` [RFC 5/8] x86_64/bug: Add BUG_FORMAT basics Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 14:42 ` [RFC 6/8] x86_64/bug: Implement __WARN_printf() Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 15:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-02 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 16:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-02 18:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 20:04 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-02 20:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-06-02 20:33 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2025-06-02 21:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 22:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 23:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-03 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-03 22:23 ` David Laight
2025-06-02 14:42 ` [RFC 7/8] x86/bug: Implement WARN_ONCE() Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-02 14:42 ` [RFC 8/8] x86: Clean up default rethunk warning Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e592449-7abb-4d41-992b-7fe25f667691@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=acarmina@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox