public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
	namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, irogers@google.com,
	adrian.hunter@intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
	zide.chen@intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	ravi.bangoria@amd.com, Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH V2 11/13] perf/x86: Add eGPRs into sample_regs
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 12:56:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250626195610.405379-12-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250626195610.405379-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

The eGPRs is only supported when the new SIMD registers configuration
method is used, which moves the XMM to sample_simd_vec_regs. So the
space can be reclaimed for the eGPRs.

The eGPRs is retrieved by XSAVE. Only support the eGPRs for X86_64.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/core.c                | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++------
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h          |  1 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h     |  4 +++
 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 26 +++++++++++++++--
 arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c           | 31 ++++++++++----------
 5 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index d4710edce2e9..1da18886e1f3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -429,6 +429,8 @@ static void x86_pmu_get_ext_regs(struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs, u64 mask)
 		perf_regs->h16zmm = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_Hi16_ZMM);
 	if (mask & XFEATURE_MASK_OPMASK)
 		perf_regs->opmask = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_OPMASK);
+	if (mask & XFEATURE_MASK_APX)
+		perf_regs->egpr = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_APX);
 }
 
 static void release_ext_regs_buffers(void)
@@ -463,6 +465,8 @@ static void reserve_ext_regs_buffers(void)
 		mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_Hi16_ZMM;
 	if (x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & X86_EXT_REGS_OPMASK)
 		mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_OPMASK;
+	if (x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & X86_EXT_REGS_EGPRS)
+		mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_APX;
 
 	size = xstate_calculate_size(mask, true);
 
@@ -718,17 +722,33 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 	}
 
 	if (event->attr.sample_type & (PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR | PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER)) {
-		/*
-		 * Besides the general purpose registers, XMM registers may
-		 * be collected as well.
-		 */
-		if (event_has_extended_regs(event)) {
-			if (!(event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS))
+		if (event->attr.sample_simd_regs_enabled) {
+			u64 reserved = ~GENMASK_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX - 1, 0);
+
+			if (!(event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS))
 				return -EINVAL;
-			if (!(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & X86_EXT_REGS_XMM))
+			/*
+			 * The XMM space in the perf_event_x86_regs is reclaimed
+			 * for eGPRs and other general registers.
+			 */
+			if (event->attr.sample_regs_user & reserved ||
+			    event->attr.sample_regs_intr & reserved)
 				return -EINVAL;
-			if (event->attr.sample_simd_regs_enabled)
+			if ((event->attr.sample_regs_user & PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK ||
+			     event->attr.sample_regs_intr & PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK) &&
+			     !(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & X86_EXT_REGS_EGPRS))
 				return -EINVAL;
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * Besides the general purpose registers, XMM registers may
+			 * be collected as well.
+			 */
+			if (event_has_extended_regs(event)) {
+				if (!(event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS))
+					return -EINVAL;
+				if (!(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & X86_EXT_REGS_XMM))
+					return -EINVAL;
+			}
 		}
 
 		if (event_has_simd_regs(event)) {
@@ -1890,6 +1910,11 @@ void x86_pmu_setup_regs_data(struct perf_event *event,
 			perf_regs->opmask_regs = NULL;
 			mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_OPMASK;
 		}
+		if (attr->sample_regs_user & PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK ||
+		    attr->sample_regs_intr & PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK) {
+			perf_regs->egpr_regs = NULL;
+			mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_APX;
+		}
 	}
 
 	mask &= ~ignore_mask;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index cc0bd9479fa7..4dd1e7344021 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -705,6 +705,7 @@ enum {
 	X86_EXT_REGS_ZMMH	= BIT_ULL(2),
 	X86_EXT_REGS_H16ZMM	= BIT_ULL(3),
 	X86_EXT_REGS_OPMASK	= BIT_ULL(4),
+	X86_EXT_REGS_EGPRS	= BIT_ULL(5),
 };
 
 #define PERF_PEBS_DATA_SOURCE_MAX	0x100
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index dda677022882..4400cb66bc8e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -613,6 +613,10 @@ struct x86_perf_regs {
 		u64	*opmask_regs;
 		struct avx_512_opmask_state *opmask;
 	};
+	union {
+		u64	*egpr_regs;
+		struct apx_state *egpr;
+	};
 };
 
 extern unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index dd7bd1dd8d39..cd0f6804debf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -27,11 +27,31 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
 	PERF_REG_X86_R13,
 	PERF_REG_X86_R14,
 	PERF_REG_X86_R15,
+	/* Extended GPRs (EGPRs) */
+	PERF_REG_X86_R16,
+	PERF_REG_X86_R17,
+	PERF_REG_X86_R18,
+	PERF_REG_X86_R19,
+	PERF_REG_X86_R20,
+	PERF_REG_X86_R21,
+	PERF_REG_X86_R22,
+	PERF_REG_X86_R23,
+	PERF_REG_X86_R24,
+	PERF_REG_X86_R25,
+	PERF_REG_X86_R26,
+	PERF_REG_X86_R27,
+	PERF_REG_X86_R28,
+	PERF_REG_X86_R29,
+	PERF_REG_X86_R30,
+	PERF_REG_X86_R31,
 	/* These are the limits for the GPRs. */
 	PERF_REG_X86_32_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_GS + 1,
-	PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_R15 + 1,
+	PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_R31 + 1,
 
-	/* These all need two bits set because they are 128bit */
+	/*
+	 * These all need two bits set because they are 128bit.
+	 * These are only available when !PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD
+	 */
 	PERF_REG_X86_XMM0  = 32,
 	PERF_REG_X86_XMM1  = 34,
 	PERF_REG_X86_XMM2  = 36,
@@ -55,6 +75,8 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
 
 #define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK	(~((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_XMM0) - 1))
 
+#define PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK		GENMASK_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_R31, PERF_REG_X86_R16)
+
 #define PERF_X86_SIMD_PRED_REGS_MAX	8
 #define PERF_X86_SIMD_PRED_MASK		GENMASK(PERF_X86_SIMD_PRED_REGS_MAX - 1, 0)
 #define PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_REGS_MAX	32
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
index b569368743a4..3780a7b0e021 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -61,14 +61,22 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
 {
 	struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs;
 
-	if (idx >= PERF_REG_X86_XMM0 && idx < PERF_REG_X86_XMM_MAX) {
+	if (idx > PERF_REG_X86_R15) {
 		perf_regs = container_of(regs, struct x86_perf_regs, regs);
-		/* SIMD registers are moved to dedicated sample_simd_vec_reg */
-		if (perf_regs->abi & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD)
-			return 0;
-		if (!perf_regs->xmm_regs)
-			return 0;
-		return perf_regs->xmm_regs[idx - PERF_REG_X86_XMM0];
+
+		if (perf_regs->abi & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD) {
+			if (idx <= PERF_REG_X86_R31) {
+				if (!perf_regs->egpr_regs)
+					return 0;
+				return perf_regs->egpr_regs[idx - PERF_REG_X86_R16];
+			}
+		} else {
+			if (idx >= PERF_REG_X86_XMM0 && idx < PERF_REG_X86_XMM_MAX) {
+				if (!perf_regs->xmm_regs)
+					return 0;
+				return perf_regs->xmm_regs[idx - PERF_REG_X86_XMM0];
+			}
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(pt_regs_offset)))
@@ -149,14 +157,7 @@ int perf_simd_reg_validate(u16 vec_qwords, u64 vec_mask,
 				 ~((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_MAX) - 1))
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
-#define REG_NOSUPPORT ((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R8) | \
-		       (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R9) | \
-		       (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R10) | \
-		       (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R11) | \
-		       (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R12) | \
-		       (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R13) | \
-		       (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R14) | \
-		       (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R15))
+#define REG_NOSUPPORT GENMASK_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_R31, PERF_REG_X86_R8)
 
 int perf_reg_validate(u64 mask)
 {
-- 
2.38.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-26 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-26 19:55 [RFC PATCH V2 00/13] Support vector and more extended registers in perf kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:55 ` [RFC PATCH V2 01/13] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in the x86 nmi handler kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:55 ` [RFC PATCH V2 02/13] perf/x86: Setup the regs data kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 03/13] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi kan.liang
2025-07-02  0:18   ` Chang S. Bae
2025-07-07 18:12     ` Liang, Kan
2025-07-07 18:17       ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 04/13] perf: Move has_extended_regs() to header file kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 05/13] perf/x86: Support XMM register for non-PEBS and REGS_USER kan.liang
2025-06-27 14:35   ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-27 21:23     ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 06/13] perf: Support SIMD registers kan.liang
2025-07-02 11:16   ` Mark Brown
2025-07-07 18:12     ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 07/13] perf/x86: Move XMM to sample_simd_vec_regs kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 08/13] perf/x86: Add YMM into sample_simd_vec_regs kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 09/13] perf/x86: Add ZMM " kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 10/13] perf/x86: Add OPMASK into sample_simd_pred_reg kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:56 ` kan.liang [this message]
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 12/13] perf/x86: Add SSP into sample_regs kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 13/13] perf/x86/intel: Enable PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS kan.liang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250626195610.405379-12-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox