From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, irogers@google.com,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
zide.chen@intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
ravi.bangoria@amd.com, Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH V2 11/13] perf/x86: Add eGPRs into sample_regs
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 12:56:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250626195610.405379-12-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250626195610.405379-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
The eGPRs is only supported when the new SIMD registers configuration
method is used, which moves the XMM to sample_simd_vec_regs. So the
space can be reclaimed for the eGPRs.
The eGPRs is retrieved by XSAVE. Only support the eGPRs for X86_64.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/core.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++------
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 +++
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 26 +++++++++++++++--
arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 31 ++++++++++----------
5 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index d4710edce2e9..1da18886e1f3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -429,6 +429,8 @@ static void x86_pmu_get_ext_regs(struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs, u64 mask)
perf_regs->h16zmm = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_Hi16_ZMM);
if (mask & XFEATURE_MASK_OPMASK)
perf_regs->opmask = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_OPMASK);
+ if (mask & XFEATURE_MASK_APX)
+ perf_regs->egpr = get_xsave_addr(xsave, XFEATURE_APX);
}
static void release_ext_regs_buffers(void)
@@ -463,6 +465,8 @@ static void reserve_ext_regs_buffers(void)
mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_Hi16_ZMM;
if (x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & X86_EXT_REGS_OPMASK)
mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_OPMASK;
+ if (x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & X86_EXT_REGS_EGPRS)
+ mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_APX;
size = xstate_calculate_size(mask, true);
@@ -718,17 +722,33 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
}
if (event->attr.sample_type & (PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR | PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER)) {
- /*
- * Besides the general purpose registers, XMM registers may
- * be collected as well.
- */
- if (event_has_extended_regs(event)) {
- if (!(event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS))
+ if (event->attr.sample_simd_regs_enabled) {
+ u64 reserved = ~GENMASK_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX - 1, 0);
+
+ if (!(event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS))
return -EINVAL;
- if (!(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & X86_EXT_REGS_XMM))
+ /*
+ * The XMM space in the perf_event_x86_regs is reclaimed
+ * for eGPRs and other general registers.
+ */
+ if (event->attr.sample_regs_user & reserved ||
+ event->attr.sample_regs_intr & reserved)
return -EINVAL;
- if (event->attr.sample_simd_regs_enabled)
+ if ((event->attr.sample_regs_user & PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK ||
+ event->attr.sample_regs_intr & PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK) &&
+ !(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & X86_EXT_REGS_EGPRS))
return -EINVAL;
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Besides the general purpose registers, XMM registers may
+ * be collected as well.
+ */
+ if (event_has_extended_regs(event)) {
+ if (!(event->pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (!(x86_pmu.ext_regs_mask & X86_EXT_REGS_XMM))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
}
if (event_has_simd_regs(event)) {
@@ -1890,6 +1910,11 @@ void x86_pmu_setup_regs_data(struct perf_event *event,
perf_regs->opmask_regs = NULL;
mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_OPMASK;
}
+ if (attr->sample_regs_user & PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK ||
+ attr->sample_regs_intr & PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK) {
+ perf_regs->egpr_regs = NULL;
+ mask |= XFEATURE_MASK_APX;
+ }
}
mask &= ~ignore_mask;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index cc0bd9479fa7..4dd1e7344021 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -705,6 +705,7 @@ enum {
X86_EXT_REGS_ZMMH = BIT_ULL(2),
X86_EXT_REGS_H16ZMM = BIT_ULL(3),
X86_EXT_REGS_OPMASK = BIT_ULL(4),
+ X86_EXT_REGS_EGPRS = BIT_ULL(5),
};
#define PERF_PEBS_DATA_SOURCE_MAX 0x100
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index dda677022882..4400cb66bc8e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -613,6 +613,10 @@ struct x86_perf_regs {
u64 *opmask_regs;
struct avx_512_opmask_state *opmask;
};
+ union {
+ u64 *egpr_regs;
+ struct apx_state *egpr;
+ };
};
extern unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index dd7bd1dd8d39..cd0f6804debf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -27,11 +27,31 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
PERF_REG_X86_R13,
PERF_REG_X86_R14,
PERF_REG_X86_R15,
+ /* Extended GPRs (EGPRs) */
+ PERF_REG_X86_R16,
+ PERF_REG_X86_R17,
+ PERF_REG_X86_R18,
+ PERF_REG_X86_R19,
+ PERF_REG_X86_R20,
+ PERF_REG_X86_R21,
+ PERF_REG_X86_R22,
+ PERF_REG_X86_R23,
+ PERF_REG_X86_R24,
+ PERF_REG_X86_R25,
+ PERF_REG_X86_R26,
+ PERF_REG_X86_R27,
+ PERF_REG_X86_R28,
+ PERF_REG_X86_R29,
+ PERF_REG_X86_R30,
+ PERF_REG_X86_R31,
/* These are the limits for the GPRs. */
PERF_REG_X86_32_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_GS + 1,
- PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_R15 + 1,
+ PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_R31 + 1,
- /* These all need two bits set because they are 128bit */
+ /*
+ * These all need two bits set because they are 128bit.
+ * These are only available when !PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD
+ */
PERF_REG_X86_XMM0 = 32,
PERF_REG_X86_XMM1 = 34,
PERF_REG_X86_XMM2 = 36,
@@ -55,6 +75,8 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK (~((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_XMM0) - 1))
+#define PERF_X86_EGPRS_MASK GENMASK_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_R31, PERF_REG_X86_R16)
+
#define PERF_X86_SIMD_PRED_REGS_MAX 8
#define PERF_X86_SIMD_PRED_MASK GENMASK(PERF_X86_SIMD_PRED_REGS_MAX - 1, 0)
#define PERF_X86_SIMD_VEC_REGS_MAX 32
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
index b569368743a4..3780a7b0e021 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -61,14 +61,22 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
{
struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs;
- if (idx >= PERF_REG_X86_XMM0 && idx < PERF_REG_X86_XMM_MAX) {
+ if (idx > PERF_REG_X86_R15) {
perf_regs = container_of(regs, struct x86_perf_regs, regs);
- /* SIMD registers are moved to dedicated sample_simd_vec_reg */
- if (perf_regs->abi & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD)
- return 0;
- if (!perf_regs->xmm_regs)
- return 0;
- return perf_regs->xmm_regs[idx - PERF_REG_X86_XMM0];
+
+ if (perf_regs->abi & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_SIMD) {
+ if (idx <= PERF_REG_X86_R31) {
+ if (!perf_regs->egpr_regs)
+ return 0;
+ return perf_regs->egpr_regs[idx - PERF_REG_X86_R16];
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (idx >= PERF_REG_X86_XMM0 && idx < PERF_REG_X86_XMM_MAX) {
+ if (!perf_regs->xmm_regs)
+ return 0;
+ return perf_regs->xmm_regs[idx - PERF_REG_X86_XMM0];
+ }
+ }
}
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(pt_regs_offset)))
@@ -149,14 +157,7 @@ int perf_simd_reg_validate(u16 vec_qwords, u64 vec_mask,
~((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_MAX) - 1))
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
-#define REG_NOSUPPORT ((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R8) | \
- (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R9) | \
- (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R10) | \
- (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R11) | \
- (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R12) | \
- (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R13) | \
- (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R14) | \
- (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R15))
+#define REG_NOSUPPORT GENMASK_ULL(PERF_REG_X86_R31, PERF_REG_X86_R8)
int perf_reg_validate(u64 mask)
{
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-26 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-26 19:55 [RFC PATCH V2 00/13] Support vector and more extended registers in perf kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:55 ` [RFC PATCH V2 01/13] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in the x86 nmi handler kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:55 ` [RFC PATCH V2 02/13] perf/x86: Setup the regs data kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 03/13] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi kan.liang
2025-07-02 0:18 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-07-07 18:12 ` Liang, Kan
2025-07-07 18:17 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 04/13] perf: Move has_extended_regs() to header file kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 05/13] perf/x86: Support XMM register for non-PEBS and REGS_USER kan.liang
2025-06-27 14:35 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-27 21:23 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 06/13] perf: Support SIMD registers kan.liang
2025-07-02 11:16 ` Mark Brown
2025-07-07 18:12 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 07/13] perf/x86: Move XMM to sample_simd_vec_regs kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 08/13] perf/x86: Add YMM into sample_simd_vec_regs kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 09/13] perf/x86: Add ZMM " kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 10/13] perf/x86: Add OPMASK into sample_simd_pred_reg kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:56 ` kan.liang [this message]
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 12/13] perf/x86: Add SSP into sample_regs kan.liang
2025-06-26 19:56 ` [RFC PATCH V2 13/13] perf/x86/intel: Enable PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250626195610.405379-12-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox