* [IPSEC] xfrm_state locking problem in xfrm_input.c
@ 2009-05-11 22:47 Yury Polyanskiy
2009-05-12 3:48 ` Herbert Xu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yury Polyanskiy @ 2009-05-11 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Herbert Xu; +Cc: David S. Miller, netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1917 bytes --]
xfrm_input() code uses spin_lock() where it must be using
spin_lock_bh() instead. The corresponding code in xfrm_output.c
correctly uses spin_lock_bh().
Note that if the locally generated packet is sent to a local ip,
dev_queue_xmit() calls loopback_xmit() and the xfrm_input() will be
called with softirqs enabled.
This might lead to a deadlock since x->lock is acquired in
xfrm_timer_handler().
Signed-off-by: Yury Polyanskiy <polyanskiy@gmail.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c | 10 +++++-----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
index b4a1317..4494918 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
skb->sp->xvec[skb->sp->len++] = x;
- spin_lock(&x->lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
if (unlikely(x->km.state != XFRM_STATE_VALID)) {
XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINSTATEINVALID);
goto drop_unlock;
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
goto drop_unlock;
}
- spin_unlock(&x->lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.input = seq;
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
return 0;
resume:
- spin_lock(&x->lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
if (nexthdr <= 0) {
if (nexthdr == -EBADMSG) {
xfrm_audit_state_icvfail(x, skb,
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ resume:
x->curlft.bytes += skb->len;
x->curlft.packets++;
- spin_unlock(&x->lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
XFRM_MODE_SKB_CB(skb)->protocol = nexthdr;
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ resume:
}
drop_unlock:
- spin_unlock(&x->lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
drop:
kfree_skb(skb);
return 0;
--
1.6.2.4
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [IPSEC] xfrm_state locking problem in xfrm_input.c
2009-05-11 22:47 [IPSEC] xfrm_state locking problem in xfrm_input.c Yury Polyanskiy
@ 2009-05-12 3:48 ` Herbert Xu
2009-05-12 4:05 ` Yury Polyanskiy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Xu @ 2009-05-12 3:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yury Polyanskiy; +Cc: David S. Miller, netdev
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 06:47:39PM -0400, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
> xfrm_input() code uses spin_lock() where it must be using
> spin_lock_bh() instead. The corresponding code in xfrm_output.c
> correctly uses spin_lock_bh().
>
> Note that if the locally generated packet is sent to a local ip,
> dev_queue_xmit() calls loopback_xmit() and the xfrm_input() will be
> called with softirqs enabled.
dev_queue_xmit always disables BH before calling the device xmit
function. So how can this happen?
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [IPSEC] xfrm_state locking problem in xfrm_input.c
2009-05-12 3:48 ` Herbert Xu
@ 2009-05-12 4:05 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2009-05-12 5:07 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yury Polyanskiy @ 2009-05-12 4:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Herbert Xu; +Cc: David S. Miller, netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 676 bytes --]
On Tue, 12 May 2009 13:48:13 +1000
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 06:47:39PM -0400, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
> > xfrm_input() code uses spin_lock() where it must be using
> > spin_lock_bh() instead. The corresponding code in xfrm_output.c
> > correctly uses spin_lock_bh().
> >
> > Note that if the locally generated packet is sent to a local ip,
> > dev_queue_xmit() calls loopback_xmit() and the xfrm_input() will be
> > called with softirqs enabled.
>
> dev_queue_xmit always disables BH before calling the device xmit
> function. So how can this happen?
>
Oops, you right. Thanks for the explanation!
YP
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [IPSEC] xfrm_state locking problem in xfrm_input.c
2009-05-12 4:05 ` Yury Polyanskiy
@ 2009-05-12 5:07 ` David Miller
2009-05-12 13:32 ` Yury Polyanskiy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2009-05-12 5:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ypolyans; +Cc: herbert, netdev
From: Yury Polyanskiy <ypolyans@Princeton.EDU>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:05:16 -0400
> On Tue, 12 May 2009 13:48:13 +1000
> Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 06:47:39PM -0400, Yury Polyanskiy wrote:
>> > xfrm_input() code uses spin_lock() where it must be using
>> > spin_lock_bh() instead. The corresponding code in xfrm_output.c
>> > correctly uses spin_lock_bh().
>> >
>> > Note that if the locally generated packet is sent to a local ip,
>> > dev_queue_xmit() calls loopback_xmit() and the xfrm_input() will be
>> > called with softirqs enabled.
>>
>> dev_queue_xmit always disables BH before calling the device xmit
>> function. So how can this happen?
>>
>
> Oops, you right. Thanks for the explanation!
So you didn't actually hit a bug that led you to write that
patch?
Please state this explicitly next time, and tell us that you are
"fixing" something based purely upon code inspection rather than
hitting a bug yourself.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [IPSEC] xfrm_state locking problem in xfrm_input.c
2009-05-12 5:07 ` David Miller
@ 2009-05-12 13:32 ` Yury Polyanskiy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Yury Polyanskiy @ 2009-05-12 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller; +Cc: herbert, netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 920 bytes --]
On Mon, 11 May 2009 22:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> >> > Note that if the locally generated packet is sent to a local ip,
> >> > dev_queue_xmit() calls loopback_xmit() and the xfrm_input() will
> >> > be called with softirqs enabled.
> >>
> >> dev_queue_xmit always disables BH before calling the device xmit
> >> function. So how can this happen?
> >>
> >
> > Oops, you right. Thanks for the explanation!
>
> So you didn't actually hit a bug that led you to write that
> patch?
>
> Please state this explicitly next time, and tell us that you are
> "fixing" something based purely upon code inspection rather than
> hitting a bug yourself.
>
Well, I hit some bug (occasional hard lockup of the box on ipsec'ed
data transfers), and this seemed as an excellent fit, because I
frequently test it on local->local trafic. Anyways, sorry for bothering.
YP
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-12 13:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-11 22:47 [IPSEC] xfrm_state locking problem in xfrm_input.c Yury Polyanskiy
2009-05-12 3:48 ` Herbert Xu
2009-05-12 4:05 ` Yury Polyanskiy
2009-05-12 5:07 ` David Miller
2009-05-12 13:32 ` Yury Polyanskiy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox