Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wang Zhan <wang.zhan@smartx.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, keyong.sun@smartx.com,
	Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
	Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
	Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
	dev@openvswitch.org, Wang Zhan <wang.zhan@smartx.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	Jason Wang <jasowangio@gmail.com>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
	Alice Mikityanska <alice@isovalent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: core: resegment oversized TCP GSO skbs
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:31:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260920133105.3611768-1-wang.zhan@smartx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <willemdebruijn.kernel.32be703ea17ab@gmail.com>

On Sat, 19 Sep 2026 11:37:45 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> >  	return skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs <= READ_ONCE(dev->gso_max_segs) &&
> > -	       skb->len < netif_get_gso_max_size(dev, skb->protocol);
> > +	       skb->len < netif_get_gso_max_size(dev, vlan_get_protocol(skb));
>
> If this change is needed, it is not new for this feature and should be
> a separate commit.

Okay, will do it in v3 as patch 1/5, with a Fixes tag.

> > +	if (!skb_is_gso(skb) || !skb_is_gso_tcp(skb) ||
> > +	    skb->encapsulation || mss == GSO_BY_FRAGS ||
> > +	    !skb_mac_header_was_set(skb) ||
> > +	    !skb_transport_header_was_set(skb) ||
> > +	    !skb_can_gso_resegment(skb, features))
> > +		return 0;
>
> Is this duplicating/extending skb_can_gso_resegment

Okay, v3 folds skb_can_gso_resegment() into skb_gso_resegment_max_segs():
one caller, so the checks stay in one list.

> > +	if (skb_is_gso(skb) && skb_is_gso_tcp(skb) && !skb->encapsulation &&
> > +	    !gso_within_device_limits(skb, dev)) {
> > +		netdev_features_t offload = __netif_skb_features(skb, false);
> > +
> > +		resegment_max_segs =
> > +			skb_gso_resegment_max_segs(skb, dev, offload);
> > +		if (resegment_max_segs)
> > +			features = offload;
> > +	}
>
> This is a lot to put in the hot path for a rare use case. Consider how
> to make this less expensive.

Okay, v3 enters on

	if (unlikely(skb_is_gso(skb) && !(features & NETIF_F_GSO_MASK))) {

features is what netif_skb_features() returned a few lines above, and
gso_features_check() has already cleared the GSO bits for an over-limit
skb, so the common path reads two bits of a value which is already loaded.
An oversized skb then pays one __netif_skb_features(skb, false) call.
Could you take a look whether that is cheap enough?

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-20 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-18  8:46 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: resegment oversized TCP GSO skbs Wang Zhan
2026-09-18  8:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: core: factor out the GSO device limit check Wang Zhan
2026-09-18  8:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net: gso: support bounded TCP segmentation Wang Zhan
2026-09-19 15:35   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-20 13:12     ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-21 20:36       ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-23  9:45         ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-23 16:42           ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-24  9:03             ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-21 21:07       ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-23 10:38         ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-23 16:44           ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-24  9:27             ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-21 20:50   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-23 16:50   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-24  9:09     ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-24 10:53   ` David Laight
2026-09-24 12:15     ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-24 14:09   ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-25  7:45     ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-18  8:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: core: resegment oversized TCP GSO skbs Wang Zhan
2026-09-19 15:37   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-20 13:31     ` Wang Zhan [this message]
2026-09-24 14:02     ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-21 20:50   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-18  8:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net: net_test: add tests for bounded GSO segmentation Wang Zhan
2026-09-21 20:50   ` netdev-bot+sashiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260920133105.3611768-1-wang.zhan@smartx.com \
    --to=wang.zhan@smartx.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=alice@isovalent.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
    --cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
    --cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
    --cc=keyong.sun@smartx.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox