From: Wang Zhan <wang.zhan@smartx.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, keyong.sun@smartx.com,
Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
dev@openvswitch.org, Wang Zhan <wang.zhan@smartx.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Jason Wang <jasowangio@gmail.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Alice Mikityanska <alice@isovalent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: core: resegment oversized TCP GSO skbs
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:31:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260920133105.3611768-1-wang.zhan@smartx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <willemdebruijn.kernel.32be703ea17ab@gmail.com>
On Sat, 19 Sep 2026 11:37:45 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > return skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs <= READ_ONCE(dev->gso_max_segs) &&
> > - skb->len < netif_get_gso_max_size(dev, skb->protocol);
> > + skb->len < netif_get_gso_max_size(dev, vlan_get_protocol(skb));
>
> If this change is needed, it is not new for this feature and should be
> a separate commit.
Okay, will do it in v3 as patch 1/5, with a Fixes tag.
> > + if (!skb_is_gso(skb) || !skb_is_gso_tcp(skb) ||
> > + skb->encapsulation || mss == GSO_BY_FRAGS ||
> > + !skb_mac_header_was_set(skb) ||
> > + !skb_transport_header_was_set(skb) ||
> > + !skb_can_gso_resegment(skb, features))
> > + return 0;
>
> Is this duplicating/extending skb_can_gso_resegment
Okay, v3 folds skb_can_gso_resegment() into skb_gso_resegment_max_segs():
one caller, so the checks stay in one list.
> > + if (skb_is_gso(skb) && skb_is_gso_tcp(skb) && !skb->encapsulation &&
> > + !gso_within_device_limits(skb, dev)) {
> > + netdev_features_t offload = __netif_skb_features(skb, false);
> > +
> > + resegment_max_segs =
> > + skb_gso_resegment_max_segs(skb, dev, offload);
> > + if (resegment_max_segs)
> > + features = offload;
> > + }
>
> This is a lot to put in the hot path for a rare use case. Consider how
> to make this less expensive.
Okay, v3 enters on
if (unlikely(skb_is_gso(skb) && !(features & NETIF_F_GSO_MASK))) {
features is what netif_skb_features() returned a few lines above, and
gso_features_check() has already cleared the GSO bits for an over-limit
skb, so the common path reads two bits of a value which is already loaded.
An oversized skb then pays one __netif_skb_features(skb, false) call.
Could you take a look whether that is cheap enough?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-20 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 8:46 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: resegment oversized TCP GSO skbs Wang Zhan
2026-09-18 8:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: core: factor out the GSO device limit check Wang Zhan
2026-09-18 8:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net: gso: support bounded TCP segmentation Wang Zhan
2026-09-19 15:35 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-20 13:12 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-21 20:36 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-23 9:45 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-23 16:42 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-24 9:03 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-21 21:07 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-23 10:38 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-23 16:44 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-24 9:27 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-21 20:50 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-23 16:50 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-24 9:09 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-24 10:53 ` David Laight
2026-09-24 12:15 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-24 14:09 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-25 7:45 ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-18 8:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: core: resegment oversized TCP GSO skbs Wang Zhan
2026-09-19 15:37 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-20 13:31 ` Wang Zhan [this message]
2026-09-24 14:02 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-21 20:50 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-18 8:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net: net_test: add tests for bounded GSO segmentation Wang Zhan
2026-09-21 20:50 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260920133105.3611768-1-wang.zhan@smartx.com \
--to=wang.zhan@smartx.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=alice@isovalent.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=keyong.sun@smartx.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox