Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Wang Zhan <wang.zhan@smartx.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	horms@kernel.org, keyong.sun@smartx.com,
	Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
	Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
	Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
	dev@openvswitch.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	Jason Wang <jasowangio@gmail.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
	Alice Mikityanska <alice@isovalent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net: gso: support bounded TCP segmentation
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 16:09:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <611ec0af-8e4c-495d-9300-6dc9b5d616a1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918084651.3022878-3-wang.zhan@smartx.com>

On 9/18/26 10:46, Wang Zhan wrote:
> The bounded resegmentation added by the next patch splits an oversized TCP
> GSO skb into several GSO skbs which fit the device limits. That needs the
> GSO engine to group several MSS segments into one output skb, so let
> callers bound the number of MSS segments each output skb carries and pass
> the bound through the existing __skb_gso_segment() entry point. Ordinary
> callers use zero for no limit.
> 
> skb_segment() only groups several MSS into one output skb when the device
> advertises NETIF_F_GSO_PARTIAL, or when the skb has a frag_list which can
> be split into uniform pieces, and falls back to one segment per skb
> otherwise. A caller which passes a bound asks for that grouping
> regardless, so the frag_list check is skipped when max_segs is set. Every
> other caller keeps it, and the bounded path is only used for skbs which do
> not carry a frag_list.
> 
> The output stays a GSO skb: gso_size is the original MSS and gso_segs is
> the number of MSS it holds, so a downstream device can still perform
> ordinary TSO. Store the bound in the existing skb_gso_cb scratch context,
> alongside the call-local data_offset and mac_offset fields, so that the
> segmentation methods keep their signature. A zero max_segs value means
> that no bound is active; it is not a persistent skb flag. Clear the value
> when each output skb copies the input header so the temporary limit is not
> propagated to the next GSO call.
> 
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Wang Zhan <wang.zhan@smartx.com>
I'm wondering if this patch is needed at all. Can't the special gso caller
set skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size to ~64K and adjust the gso bits in the shared
info afterwards?

/P


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-18  8:46 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: resegment oversized TCP GSO skbs Wang Zhan
2026-09-18  8:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: core: factor out the GSO device limit check Wang Zhan
2026-09-18  8:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net: gso: support bounded TCP segmentation Wang Zhan
2026-09-19 15:35   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-20 13:12     ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-21 20:36       ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-23  9:45         ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-23 16:42           ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-24  9:03             ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-21 21:07       ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-23 10:38         ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-23 16:44           ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-24  9:27             ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-21 20:50   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-23 16:50   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-24  9:09     ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-24 10:53   ` David Laight
2026-09-24 12:15     ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-24 14:09   ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-09-25  7:45     ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-18  8:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: core: resegment oversized TCP GSO skbs Wang Zhan
2026-09-19 15:37   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-09-20 13:31     ` Wang Zhan
2026-09-24 14:02     ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-21 20:50   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-18  8:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net: net_test: add tests for bounded GSO segmentation Wang Zhan
2026-09-21 20:50   ` netdev-bot+sashiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=611ec0af-8e4c-495d-9300-6dc9b5d616a1@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=alice@isovalent.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
    --cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
    --cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
    --cc=keyong.sun@smartx.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wang.zhan@smartx.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox