From: Usman Malik <usmalik90@gmail.com>
To: "Jérémy Jean" <Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec 4/7] xfrm: prevent AES-GCM nonce reuse after early GSO
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 11:08:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F06270EF-7648-4E76-811F-C607A8390835@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930144523.435271-6-Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>
On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 14:45:21 +0000, Jeremy Jean wrote:
> In the software ESP offload path, xfrm_output_gso() leaves its segments
> sharing a secpath extension. Each segment gets its own ESP sequence
> number, but stores it in the same xo->seq field for IV generation.
Tested this patch as posted (patchwork 14858684) on v7.3 against the
same build without it. Both kernels carry patch 1/7 of this series
and no other patch of it, plus my "xfrm: use software GSO for inner
tunnels without crypto offload" v1, which does not change the
tunnel-mode path and moves the transport-mode case onto it. The test
ran in a VM with two network namespaces on a veth, TCP through an
ip6tnl tunnel over an rfc4106(gcm(aes)) SA, esp6_offload loaded, a
tbf qdisc on the egress veth that queues the segments, 3 MB per run
and 3 runs per case. The sender capture was decrypted with the SA
keys.
Without this patch every queued run reused IV values, 92, 51 and 51
per run over a tunnel-mode SA and 50, 51 and 50 over a transport-mode
SA, each shared by up to 7 segments of one GSO packet, with ct1 XOR
ct2 equal to pt1 XOR pt2 for one pair under each value. With this
patch, 0 in all 6 runs. A kernel with 1/7 alone gave 50, 50 and 51
over the tunnel-mode SA. Without the qdisc every run was 0 on every
kernel.
Tested-by: Usman Malik <usmanmalik@engineer.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 14:45 [PATCH ipsec 0/7] xfrm: fix ESP IV generation and ESN authentication Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 1/7] xfrm: esp6: use the current sequence number for the IV Jérémy Jean
2026-11-12 10:08 ` Usman Malik
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 2/7] xfrm: esp4: " Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 3/7] xfrm: esp: use the current sequence number for AAD and offload Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 4/7] xfrm: prevent AES-GCM nonce reuse after early GSO Jérémy Jean
2026-10-01 13:31 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-10-01 21:07 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-10-14 14:10 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-11-12 10:08 ` Usman Malik [this message]
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 5/7] net/mlx5e: Use the packet sequence number for the IPsec IV Jérémy Jean
2026-10-01 11:42 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-10-01 19:33 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-10-05 13:06 ` Tariq Toukan
2026-10-05 13:50 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-10-05 18:28 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-10-06 6:49 ` Tariq Toukan
2026-10-06 8:51 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 6/7] xfrm: segment untrusted GSO packets before sequence allocation Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:45 ` [PATCH ipsec 7/7] xfrm: leave the sequence counter unchanged on ESN overflow Jérémy Jean
2026-10-01 11:24 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-10-01 11:37 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-10-01 11:45 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-10-01 11:48 ` Jérémy Jean
2026-09-30 14:48 ` [PATCH ipsec 0/7] xfrm: fix ESP IV generation and ESN authentication netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-11-05 7:21 ` Steffen Klassert
2026-11-08 14:29 ` Jérémy Jean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F06270EF-7648-4E76-811F-C607A8390835@gmail.com \
--to=usmalik90@gmail.com \
--cc=Jeremy.Jean@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
--cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox