* PPTP conntrack with CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG is broken (was: newnat and patch-o-matic)
@ 2002-09-20 9:11 Cédric Rivard
2002-09-22 10:30 ` Martin Josefsson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Cédric Rivard @ 2002-09-20 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel, netfilter
Hi all,
As I've already reported, there is a problem with the PPTP conntrack module of pom. It can't be built with the option CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG. And I still receive questions about the first thread I started on this problem but without pointing the cause.
I hope that everyone is now aware of this issue.
Regards,
Cédric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: PPTP conntrack with CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG is broken (was: newnat and patch-o-matic)
2002-09-20 9:11 PPTP conntrack with CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG is broken (was: newnat and patch-o-matic) Cédric Rivard
@ 2002-09-22 10:30 ` Martin Josefsson
2002-09-25 20:48 ` PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ??? Marian Stagarescu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Martin Josefsson @ 2002-09-22 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cédric Rivard; +Cc: Netfilter-devel, Netfilter
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 11:11, Cédric Rivard wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As I've already reported, there is a problem with the PPTP conntrack module of pom. It can't be built with the option CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG. And I still receive questions about the first thread I started on this problem but without pointing the cause.
> I hope that everyone is now aware of this issue.
This issue came to my attention in the end of August, I produced a patch
and I never heard from that person again. The patch is quite ugly but it
does solve this specific problem. I was waiting for some more input from
other developers before submitting it to cvs but now I've given up on
that and I've submitted it. patch-o-matic in cvs now works with
debugging enabled.
or you can apply this patch on your kernel after patching with the
patch-o-matic you are currently using:
http://www.netfilter.org/~gandalf/patches/ip_conntrack_proto_gre.c-lockfix
--
/Martin
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat
you with experience.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ???
2002-09-22 10:30 ` Martin Josefsson
@ 2002-09-25 20:48 ` Marian Stagarescu
2002-09-25 20:56 ` Marian Stagarescu
2002-10-02 13:30 ` Harald Welte
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marian Stagarescu @ 2002-09-25 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Josefsson, Cédric Rivard; +Cc: Netfilter-devel, Netfilter
i run into one problem with PPTP conntrack:
run it with debug on: works
run it w/out debug on: does not.
i also turned on the patch below and configure the CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG:
compile ip_conntrack_pptp with debug on: all ok
compile ip_conntrack_pptp w/out debug: does not even print the ASSERT readlock
statements from CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG, PPTP connection is not established.
this debug issue was tracked down to a single printk statement in
ip_conntrack_pptp.c: line 244,245:
DEBUGP("%s, CID=%X, PCID=%X\n", strMName[msg]
ntohs(*cid), ntohs(*pcid));
i run this on a 2.4.17 mips little endian, single proc, latest pptp ALG files
from netfilter, newnat13.
how this can be ?
thanks for any input,
marian
On Sunday 22 September 2002 06:30 am, Martin Josefsson wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 11:11, Cédric Rivard wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As I've already reported, there is a problem with the PPTP conntrack
> > module of pom. It can't be built with the option CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG.
> > And I still receive questions about the first thread I started on this
> > problem but without pointing the cause. I hope that everyone is now aware
> > of this issue.
>
> This issue came to my attention in the end of August, I produced a patch
> and I never heard from that person again. The patch is quite ugly but it
> does solve this specific problem. I was waiting for some more input from
> other developers before submitting it to cvs but now I've given up on
> that and I've submitted it. patch-o-matic in cvs now works with
> debugging enabled.
>
> or you can apply this patch on your kernel after patching with the
> patch-o-matic you are currently using:
>
> http://www.netfilter.org/~gandalf/patches/ip_conntrack_proto_gre.c-lockfix
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ???
2002-09-25 20:48 ` PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ??? Marian Stagarescu
@ 2002-09-25 20:56 ` Marian Stagarescu
2002-10-02 13:30 ` Harald Welte
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marian Stagarescu @ 2002-09-25 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marian Stagarescu, Martin Josefsson, Cédric Rivard
Cc: Netfilter-devel, Netfilter
> i run into one problem with PPTP conntrack:
>
> run it with debug on: works
> run it w/out debug on: does not.
>
> i also turned on the patch below and configure the CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG:
> compile ip_conntrack_pptp with debug on: all ok
> compile ip_conntrack_pptp w/out debug: does not even print the ASSERT
> readlock statements from CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG, PPTP connection is not
> established.
>
> this debug issue was tracked down to a single printk statement in
> ip_conntrack_pptp.c: line 244,245:
>
> DEBUGP("%s, CID=%X, PCID=%X\n", strMName[msg]
> ntohs(*cid), ntohs(*pcid));
>
> i run this on a 2.4.17 mips little endian, single proc, latest pptp ALG
> files from netfilter, newnat13.
>
> how this can be ?
>
> thanks for any input,
> marian
>
> On Sunday 22 September 2002 06:30 am, Martin Josefsson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 11:11, Cédric Rivard wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > As I've already reported, there is a problem with the PPTP conntrack
> > > module of pom. It can't be built with the option
> > > CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG. And I still receive questions about the first
> > > thread I started on this problem but without pointing the cause. I hope
> > > that everyone is now aware of this issue.
> >
> > This issue came to my attention in the end of August, I produced a patch
> > and I never heard from that person again. The patch is quite ugly but it
> > does solve this specific problem. I was waiting for some more input from
> > other developers before submitting it to cvs but now I've given up on
> > that and I've submitted it. patch-o-matic in cvs now works with
> > debugging enabled.
> >
> > or you can apply this patch on your kernel after patching with the
> > patch-o-matic you are currently using:
> >
> > http://www.netfilter.org/~gandalf/patches/ip_conntrack_proto_gre.c-lockfi
> >x
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ???
2002-09-25 20:48 ` PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ??? Marian Stagarescu
2002-09-25 20:56 ` Marian Stagarescu
@ 2002-10-02 13:30 ` Harald Welte
2002-10-02 14:02 ` Marian Stagarescu
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Harald Welte @ 2002-10-02 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marian Stagarescu
Cc: Martin Josefsson,
=?iso-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Rivard_=3Ccedric=40yemanja=2Enet=3E?=,
Netfilter-devel, Netfilter
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 991 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 04:48:42PM -0400, Marian Stagarescu wrote:
> i run into one problem with PPTP conntrack:
>
> run it with debug on: works
> run it w/out debug on: does not.
what do you call 'debug' ? Does this mean the DEBUG #defines in the
respective sourcecode .c files, or are you talking about CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG?
> this debug issue was tracked down to a single printk statement in
> ip_conntrack_pptp.c: line 244,245:
>
> DEBUGP("%s, CID=%X, PCID=%X\n", strMName[msg]
> ntohs(*cid), ntohs(*pcid));
>
What happens? Does the kernel oops at this statement?
> thanks for any input,
> marian
--
Live long and prosper
- Harald Welte / laforge@gnumonks.org http://www.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as
I'm the dictator." -- George W. Bush Dec 18, 2000
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ???
2002-10-02 13:30 ` Harald Welte
@ 2002-10-02 14:02 ` Marian Stagarescu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marian Stagarescu @ 2002-10-02 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Harald Welte
Cc: Martin Josefsson, Cédric Rivard, Netfilter-devel, Netfilter
On Wednesday 02 October 2002 09:30 am, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 04:48:42PM -0400, Marian Stagarescu wrote:
> > i run into one problem with PPTP conntrack:
> >
> > run it with debug on: works
> > run it w/out debug on: does not.
>
> what do you call 'debug' ? Does this mean the DEBUG #defines in the
> respective sourcecode .c files
yes. ip_conntrack_pptp.c, ip_nat_pptp.c, ip_conntrack_proto_gre.c,
ip_nat_proto_gre.c are compiled with DEBUGP defined.
> or are you talking about
> CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG?
i have this turned on as well
> > this debug issue was tracked down to a single printk statement in
> > ip_conntrack_pptp.c: line 244,245:
> >
> > DEBUGP("%s, CID=%X, PCID=%X\n", strMName[msg]
> > ntohs(*cid), ntohs(*pcid));
>
> What happens? Does the kernel oops at this statement?
no opps but the PPTP session is not established.
I'll come back with a detailed debug log.
> > thanks for any input,
> > marian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-02 14:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-09-20 9:11 PPTP conntrack with CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG is broken (was: newnat and patch-o-matic) Cédric Rivard
2002-09-22 10:30 ` Martin Josefsson
2002-09-25 20:48 ` PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ??? Marian Stagarescu
2002-09-25 20:56 ` Marian Stagarescu
2002-10-02 13:30 ` Harald Welte
2002-10-02 14:02 ` Marian Stagarescu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox