* PPTP conntrack with CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG is broken (was: newnat and patch-o-matic) @ 2002-09-20 9:11 Cédric Rivard 2002-09-22 10:30 ` Martin Josefsson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Cédric Rivard @ 2002-09-20 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netfilter-devel, netfilter Hi all, As I've already reported, there is a problem with the PPTP conntrack module of pom. It can't be built with the option CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG. And I still receive questions about the first thread I started on this problem but without pointing the cause. I hope that everyone is now aware of this issue. Regards, Cédric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: PPTP conntrack with CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG is broken (was: newnat and patch-o-matic) 2002-09-20 9:11 PPTP conntrack with CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG is broken (was: newnat and patch-o-matic) Cédric Rivard @ 2002-09-22 10:30 ` Martin Josefsson 2002-09-25 20:48 ` PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ??? Marian Stagarescu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Martin Josefsson @ 2002-09-22 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Cédric Rivard; +Cc: Netfilter-devel, Netfilter On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 11:11, Cédric Rivard wrote: > Hi all, > > As I've already reported, there is a problem with the PPTP conntrack module of pom. It can't be built with the option CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG. And I still receive questions about the first thread I started on this problem but without pointing the cause. > I hope that everyone is now aware of this issue. This issue came to my attention in the end of August, I produced a patch and I never heard from that person again. The patch is quite ugly but it does solve this specific problem. I was waiting for some more input from other developers before submitting it to cvs but now I've given up on that and I've submitted it. patch-o-matic in cvs now works with debugging enabled. or you can apply this patch on your kernel after patching with the patch-o-matic you are currently using: http://www.netfilter.org/~gandalf/patches/ip_conntrack_proto_gre.c-lockfix -- /Martin Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ??? 2002-09-22 10:30 ` Martin Josefsson @ 2002-09-25 20:48 ` Marian Stagarescu 2002-09-25 20:56 ` Marian Stagarescu 2002-10-02 13:30 ` Harald Welte 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Marian Stagarescu @ 2002-09-25 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin Josefsson, Cédric Rivard; +Cc: Netfilter-devel, Netfilter i run into one problem with PPTP conntrack: run it with debug on: works run it w/out debug on: does not. i also turned on the patch below and configure the CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG: compile ip_conntrack_pptp with debug on: all ok compile ip_conntrack_pptp w/out debug: does not even print the ASSERT readlock statements from CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG, PPTP connection is not established. this debug issue was tracked down to a single printk statement in ip_conntrack_pptp.c: line 244,245: DEBUGP("%s, CID=%X, PCID=%X\n", strMName[msg] ntohs(*cid), ntohs(*pcid)); i run this on a 2.4.17 mips little endian, single proc, latest pptp ALG files from netfilter, newnat13. how this can be ? thanks for any input, marian On Sunday 22 September 2002 06:30 am, Martin Josefsson wrote: > On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 11:11, Cédric Rivard wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > As I've already reported, there is a problem with the PPTP conntrack > > module of pom. It can't be built with the option CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG. > > And I still receive questions about the first thread I started on this > > problem but without pointing the cause. I hope that everyone is now aware > > of this issue. > > This issue came to my attention in the end of August, I produced a patch > and I never heard from that person again. The patch is quite ugly but it > does solve this specific problem. I was waiting for some more input from > other developers before submitting it to cvs but now I've given up on > that and I've submitted it. patch-o-matic in cvs now works with > debugging enabled. > > or you can apply this patch on your kernel after patching with the > patch-o-matic you are currently using: > > http://www.netfilter.org/~gandalf/patches/ip_conntrack_proto_gre.c-lockfix ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ??? 2002-09-25 20:48 ` PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ??? Marian Stagarescu @ 2002-09-25 20:56 ` Marian Stagarescu 2002-10-02 13:30 ` Harald Welte 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Marian Stagarescu @ 2002-09-25 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marian Stagarescu, Martin Josefsson, Cédric Rivard Cc: Netfilter-devel, Netfilter > i run into one problem with PPTP conntrack: > > run it with debug on: works > run it w/out debug on: does not. > > i also turned on the patch below and configure the CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG: > compile ip_conntrack_pptp with debug on: all ok > compile ip_conntrack_pptp w/out debug: does not even print the ASSERT > readlock statements from CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG, PPTP connection is not > established. > > this debug issue was tracked down to a single printk statement in > ip_conntrack_pptp.c: line 244,245: > > DEBUGP("%s, CID=%X, PCID=%X\n", strMName[msg] > ntohs(*cid), ntohs(*pcid)); > > i run this on a 2.4.17 mips little endian, single proc, latest pptp ALG > files from netfilter, newnat13. > > how this can be ? > > thanks for any input, > marian > > On Sunday 22 September 2002 06:30 am, Martin Josefsson wrote: > > On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 11:11, Cédric Rivard wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > As I've already reported, there is a problem with the PPTP conntrack > > > module of pom. It can't be built with the option > > > CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG. And I still receive questions about the first > > > thread I started on this problem but without pointing the cause. I hope > > > that everyone is now aware of this issue. > > > > This issue came to my attention in the end of August, I produced a patch > > and I never heard from that person again. The patch is quite ugly but it > > does solve this specific problem. I was waiting for some more input from > > other developers before submitting it to cvs but now I've given up on > > that and I've submitted it. patch-o-matic in cvs now works with > > debugging enabled. > > > > or you can apply this patch on your kernel after patching with the > > patch-o-matic you are currently using: > > > > http://www.netfilter.org/~gandalf/patches/ip_conntrack_proto_gre.c-lockfi > >x ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ??? 2002-09-25 20:48 ` PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ??? Marian Stagarescu 2002-09-25 20:56 ` Marian Stagarescu @ 2002-10-02 13:30 ` Harald Welte 2002-10-02 14:02 ` Marian Stagarescu 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Harald Welte @ 2002-10-02 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marian Stagarescu Cc: Martin Josefsson, =?iso-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Rivard_=3Ccedric=40yemanja=2Enet=3E?=, Netfilter-devel, Netfilter [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 991 bytes --] On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 04:48:42PM -0400, Marian Stagarescu wrote: > i run into one problem with PPTP conntrack: > > run it with debug on: works > run it w/out debug on: does not. what do you call 'debug' ? Does this mean the DEBUG #defines in the respective sourcecode .c files, or are you talking about CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG? > this debug issue was tracked down to a single printk statement in > ip_conntrack_pptp.c: line 244,245: > > DEBUGP("%s, CID=%X, PCID=%X\n", strMName[msg] > ntohs(*cid), ntohs(*pcid)); > What happens? Does the kernel oops at this statement? > thanks for any input, > marian -- Live long and prosper - Harald Welte / laforge@gnumonks.org http://www.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." -- George W. Bush Dec 18, 2000 [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ??? 2002-10-02 13:30 ` Harald Welte @ 2002-10-02 14:02 ` Marian Stagarescu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Marian Stagarescu @ 2002-10-02 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Harald Welte Cc: Martin Josefsson, Cédric Rivard, Netfilter-devel, Netfilter On Wednesday 02 October 2002 09:30 am, Harald Welte wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 04:48:42PM -0400, Marian Stagarescu wrote: > > i run into one problem with PPTP conntrack: > > > > run it with debug on: works > > run it w/out debug on: does not. > > what do you call 'debug' ? Does this mean the DEBUG #defines in the > respective sourcecode .c files yes. ip_conntrack_pptp.c, ip_nat_pptp.c, ip_conntrack_proto_gre.c, ip_nat_proto_gre.c are compiled with DEBUGP defined. > or are you talking about > CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG? i have this turned on as well > > this debug issue was tracked down to a single printk statement in > > ip_conntrack_pptp.c: line 244,245: > > > > DEBUGP("%s, CID=%X, PCID=%X\n", strMName[msg] > > ntohs(*cid), ntohs(*pcid)); > > What happens? Does the kernel oops at this statement? no opps but the PPTP session is not established. I'll come back with a detailed debug log. > > thanks for any input, > > marian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-02 14:02 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2002-09-20 9:11 PPTP conntrack with CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG is broken (was: newnat and patch-o-matic) Cédric Rivard 2002-09-22 10:30 ` Martin Josefsson 2002-09-25 20:48 ` PPTP conntrack w/out DEBUG is broken ??? Marian Stagarescu 2002-09-25 20:56 ` Marian Stagarescu 2002-10-02 13:30 ` Harald Welte 2002-10-02 14:02 ` Marian Stagarescu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox