NVIDIA GPU driver infrastructure
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eliot Courtney" <ecourtney@nvidia.com>
To: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
	"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>, "Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: "Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	"Timur Tabi" <ttabi@nvidia.com>,
	"Eliot Courtney" <ecourtney@nvidia.com>,
	"Zhi Wang" <zhiw@nvidia.com>, <nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel" <dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: split the transport part of the receive path
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 10:56:34 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMA55SJ39DQU.2NWD9I1FRH4Z8@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020-cmdq-rpc-v5-9-dceeb8f360ec@nvidia.com>

On Tue Oct 20, 2026 at 7:08 PM JST, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> `receive_msg` currently handles both the transport and RPC layers.
> Retire it and split its logic between the new `consume_element`, a
> transport-level method which passes the parsed message contents to a
> closure before advancing the CPU read pointer past it, and the
> already-existing `await_msg`, which calls `consume_element` with a
> closure matching the RPC message.
>
> This introduces a small behavioral change: a matched RPC message that is
> too short to contain the message component itself no longer stalls the
> queue. This behavior is justified because it fixes an inconsistency:
> unmatched RPC messages were always skipped, whereas matched RPC messages
> could block the queue if they were too short. While a misconstructed RPC
> message is a problem, it is not a fatal queue error as long as the
> transport framing and checksum are valid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
> ---

[...]

> -    /// Receive a message from the GSP.
> +    /// Wait for the next element on the message queue, pass it to `f`, advance the read pointer
> +    /// past the message, and returns the result of `f`.
>      ///
> -    /// A message whose function code is `M::FUNCTION` is decoded and returned. Any other message
> -    /// is logged as an event.
> -    ///
> -    /// The read pointer is always advanced past the message, regardless of whether it matched.
> +    /// The read pointer advances regardless of whether `f` succeeds or not.
>      ///
>      /// # Errors
>      ///
>      /// - `ETIMEDOUT` if `timeout` has elapsed before any message becomes available.
> -    /// - `EIO` if a message fails framing or checksum validation.
> -    /// - `ENOMSG` if the message was not the awaited reply.
> +    /// - `EIO` if a message fails framing or checksum validation. In this case, the read pointer
> +    ///   does not advance and the queue is stalled. This is a fatal error.
>      ///
> -    /// Error codes returned by [`MessageFromGsp::read`] are propagated as-is.
> -    fn receive_msg<M: MessageFromGsp>(&mut self, timeout: Delta) -> Result<M>
> -    where
> -        // This allows all error types, including `Infallible`, to be used for `M::InitError`.
> -        Error: From<M::InitError>,
> -    {
> +    /// If an error is returned, then `f` has not been called.

optional nit: Clarify in a comment that w.r.t. `EIO` and `f` not being
called, that only applies for the outermost Err. i.e., we do have
R = Result<>, so we have Result<Result<>> but we're only talking about
the outer (transport) Result here. Maybe one way to clarify this is
that `R` contains the output of the message layer and may itself
be a Result<>, and this function returns a Result for the transport
layer. Not sure of the best way to phrase it but you know what I mean.

Reviewed-by: Eliot Courtney <ecourtney@nvidia.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-21  1:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-20 10:08 [PATCH v5 00/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: prepare the command queue for r000 dual-message types Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: remove stale comment Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 11:43   ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: simplify framing error description Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 11:43   ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: validate checksum earlier on receive Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: introduce and use proper RpcMessageHeader type Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: group the RPC-specific part of send_single_command Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: split the transport part of the send path Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: split RPC parsing part of the receive path Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: move RPC message logging to RpcMessage Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: split the transport part of the receive path Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-21  1:56   ` Eliot Courtney [this message]
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: extract await_msg_with from await_msg Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-21  2:00   ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: use consume_element to implement drain Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 14:27     ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-21  2:57       ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-21  3:12         ` John Hubbard
2026-10-21  3:23           ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-21  4:05             ` John Hubbard
2026-10-21 12:20             ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-21  2:58   ` Eliot Courtney
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: cmdq: move the RPC code into a sub-module Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: move the RPC commands " Alexandre Courbot
2026-10-20 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] gpu: nova-core: gsp: add `rpc` to RPC message send/receive methods Alexandre Courbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DMA55SJ39DQU.2NWD9I1FRH4Z8@nvidia.com \
    --to=ecourtney@nvidia.com \
    --cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lossin@kernel.org \
    --cc=nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=ttabi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox