From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
Cc: darren.hart@intel.com, Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: use oldnoconfig instead of yes '' | make oldconfig
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:10:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140129131021.GH24156@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52CC65E5.6010003@windriver.com>
Hi Bruce,
Any news on that ?
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 15:39:01 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote :
> On 14-01-07 03:27 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >On 07/01/2014 16:32, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >>On 14-01-07 09:18 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >>>When using a defconfig, using yes '' | make oldconfig may not result in
> >>>the correct configuration being set. For example:
> >>>
> >>> $ grep USB_ETH .config
> >>> CONFIG_USB_ETH=y
> >>> CONFIG_USB_ETH_RNDIS=y
> >>> CONFIG_USB_ETH_EEM=y
> >>> $ make savedefconfig
> >>> scripts/kconfig/conf --savedefconfig=defconfig Kconfig
> >>> $ cp defconfig .config
> >>> ‘defconfig’ -> ‘.config’
> >>> $ yes '' | make oldconfig
> >>> [...]
> >>> #
> >>> # configuration written to .config
> >>> #
> >>> $ grep USB_ETH .config
> >>> CONFIG_USB_ETH=m
> >>> CONFIG_USB_ETH_RNDIS=y
> >>> CONFIG_USB_ETH_EEM=y
> >>>
> >>>Using make olddefconfig solves that but we'll use oldnoconfig for
> >>>backward compatibility with older kernels.
> >>>
> >>> $ cp defconfig .config
> >>> ‘defconfig’ -> ‘.config’
> >>> $ make oldnoconfig
> >>> scripts/kconfig/conf --olddefconfig Kconfig
> >>> #
> >>> # configuration written to .config
> >>> #
> >>> $ grep USB_ETH .config
> >>> CONFIG_USB_ETH=y
> >>> CONFIG_USB_ETH_RNDIS=y
> >>> CONFIG_USB_ETH_EEM=y
> >>>
> >>>For more information, please refer to:
> >>>http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=fbe98bb9ed3dae23e320c6b113e35f129538d14a
> >>>
> >>
> >>It was my understanding that this commit changed the Kconfig behaviour
> >>to set the selected options to =y and prevent the menu choice from
> >>"hiding" the options in a depedent choice menu. But maybe I'm remembering
> >>wrong.
> >>
> >>The point being, that with that commit in place. Doesn't the behaviour
> >>match what we want with yes and oldconfig ?
> >>
> >
> >Nope, that commit is fixing the issue when using make <target>_defconfig
> >or make olddefconfig. Note that using make menuconfig already had the
> >correct behavior before that commit.
>
> right. I'm pretty familiar with that code, so I knew this worked.
>
> >
> >As shown in my commit log, using yes '' | make oldconfig is still
> >getting it wrong.
>
> But that was also my point. Since the target suggested in this
> patch hasn't always existed (and hence has a kernel version binding),
> why not use olddefconfig with this patch, and leave the functionality
> closer to its existing behaviour ? We'd still have a kernel capability
> binding, but we'd not have the =y converted to =m, and the default of
> 'y' for new functionality would be maintained.
>
> >
> >>.. I'll run some tests to confirm for myself, but I thought I'd throw
> >>the question out as well. I don't typically use defconfigs, so I need
> >>to do a bit of leg work.
> >>
> >
> >Yeah, using a full .config doesn't trigger that behavior.
>
> I don't use those either :) but the end result is the same.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bruce
>
> >
> >>I don't have any big issues with the patch, but I just want to be sure,
> >>since changing this default could change the configs of many defconfig
> >>users, and they may have been unknowingly relying on the old behaviour.
> >>
> >
> >I can understand that. But I don't see any other way to make the really
> >expected behavior to work without risking breaking anything.
> >
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-29 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-07 14:18 [PATCH] kernel: use oldnoconfig instead of yes '' | make oldconfig Alexandre Belloni
2014-01-07 14:35 ` Martin Jansa
2014-01-07 15:20 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-01-07 15:54 ` Martin Jansa
2014-01-07 18:11 ` Hart, Darren
2014-01-07 20:32 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-01-07 21:32 ` Hart, Darren
2014-01-07 15:32 ` Bruce Ashfield
2014-01-07 20:27 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-01-07 20:39 ` Bruce Ashfield
2014-01-07 20:52 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-01-07 21:14 ` Bruce Ashfield
2014-01-29 13:10 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2014-01-29 15:03 ` Bruce Ashfield
2014-02-06 13:48 ` Bruce Ashfield
2014-02-06 21:48 ` Bruce Ashfield
2014-02-07 14:02 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-07 15:11 ` Bruce Ashfield
2014-02-07 15:43 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-07 16:10 ` Bruce Ashfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140129131021.GH24156@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
--cc=darren.hart@intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox