From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: darren.hart@intel.com, Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: use oldnoconfig instead of yes '' | make oldconfig
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:32:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CC1E02.9070102@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389104317-11042-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
On 14-01-07 09:18 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> When using a defconfig, using yes '' | make oldconfig may not result in
> the correct configuration being set. For example:
>
> $ grep USB_ETH .config
> CONFIG_USB_ETH=y
> CONFIG_USB_ETH_RNDIS=y
> CONFIG_USB_ETH_EEM=y
> $ make savedefconfig
> scripts/kconfig/conf --savedefconfig=defconfig Kconfig
> $ cp defconfig .config
> ‘defconfig’ -> ‘.config’
> $ yes '' | make oldconfig
> [...]
> #
> # configuration written to .config
> #
> $ grep USB_ETH .config
> CONFIG_USB_ETH=m
> CONFIG_USB_ETH_RNDIS=y
> CONFIG_USB_ETH_EEM=y
>
> Using make olddefconfig solves that but we'll use oldnoconfig for
> backward compatibility with older kernels.
>
> $ cp defconfig .config
> ‘defconfig’ -> ‘.config’
> $ make oldnoconfig
> scripts/kconfig/conf --olddefconfig Kconfig
> #
> # configuration written to .config
> #
> $ grep USB_ETH .config
> CONFIG_USB_ETH=y
> CONFIG_USB_ETH_RNDIS=y
> CONFIG_USB_ETH_EEM=y
>
> For more information, please refer to:
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=fbe98bb9ed3dae23e320c6b113e35f129538d14a
It was my understanding that this commit changed the Kconfig behaviour
to set the selected options to =y and prevent the menu choice from
"hiding" the options in a depedent choice menu. But maybe I'm remembering
wrong.
The point being, that with that commit in place. Doesn't the behaviour
match what we want with yes and oldconfig ?
.. I'll run some tests to confirm for myself, but I thought I'd throw
the question out as well. I don't typically use defconfigs, so I need
to do a bit of leg work.
I don't have any big issues with the patch, but I just want to be sure,
since changing this default could change the configs of many defconfig
users, and they may have been unknowingly relying on the old behaviour.
Bruce
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
> index 61a6d102d7a8..644d7937923d 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ kernel_do_configure() {
> if [ -f "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" ] && [ ! -f "${B}/.config" ]; then
> cp "${WORKDIR}/defconfig" "${B}/.config"
> fi
> - yes '' | oe_runmake oldconfig
> + oe_runmake oldnoconfig
> }
>
> do_savedefconfig() {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-07 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-07 14:18 [PATCH] kernel: use oldnoconfig instead of yes '' | make oldconfig Alexandre Belloni
2014-01-07 14:35 ` Martin Jansa
2014-01-07 15:20 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-01-07 15:54 ` Martin Jansa
2014-01-07 18:11 ` Hart, Darren
2014-01-07 20:32 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-01-07 21:32 ` Hart, Darren
2014-01-07 15:32 ` Bruce Ashfield [this message]
2014-01-07 20:27 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-01-07 20:39 ` Bruce Ashfield
2014-01-07 20:52 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-01-07 21:14 ` Bruce Ashfield
2014-01-29 13:10 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-01-29 15:03 ` Bruce Ashfield
2014-02-06 13:48 ` Bruce Ashfield
2014-02-06 21:48 ` Bruce Ashfield
2014-02-07 14:02 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-07 15:11 ` Bruce Ashfield
2014-02-07 15:43 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-07 16:10 ` Bruce Ashfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CC1E02.9070102@windriver.com \
--to=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=darren.hart@intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox