From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Patil.Reddy@amd.com,
mario.limonciello@amd.com, lizhi.hou@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Use explicit SET_CMD/GET_CMD flags in amd_pmf_send_cmd()
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 19:08:35 +0200 (EET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33a8d8c0-be1d-fd6c-68e7-5244635136af@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1eef31c8-bd50-4ad7-aabe-539992ae3719@amd.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7033 bytes --]
On Tue, 18 Nov 2025, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
>
>
> On 11/18/2025 21:11, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Nov 2025, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> >
> >> Add SET_CMD and GET_CMD constants and replace boolean values passed as the
> >> get/set argument to amd_pmf_send_cmd() with the new explicit flags. This
> >> improves readability, avoids ambiguity around true/false and 0/1 usage.
> >> There is no functional change.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> >> Co-developed-by: Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@amd.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy@amd.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/auto-mode.c | 14 ++++-----
> >> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/cnqf.c | 14 ++++-----
> >> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c | 6 ++--
> >> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h | 3 ++
> >> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c | 2 +-
> >> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/sps.c | 38 ++++++++++++------------
> >> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 20 ++++++-------
> >> 7 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/auto-mode.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/auto-mode.c
> >> index a184922bba8d..faf15a8f74bb 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/auto-mode.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/auto-mode.c
> >> @@ -114,14 +114,14 @@ static void amd_pmf_set_automode(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int idx,
> >> {
> >> struct power_table_control *pwr_ctrl = &config_store.mode_set[idx].power_control;
> >>
> >> - amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPL, false, pwr_ctrl->spl, NULL);
> >> - amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_FPPT, false, pwr_ctrl->fppt, NULL);
> >> - amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPPT, false, pwr_ctrl->sppt, NULL);
> >> - amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPPT_APU_ONLY, false, pwr_ctrl->sppt_apu_only, NULL);
> >> - amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_MIN_LIMIT, false, pwr_ctrl->stt_min, NULL);
> >> - amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_LIMIT_APU, false,
> >> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPL, SET_CMD, pwr_ctrl->spl, NULL);
> >> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_FPPT, SET_CMD, pwr_ctrl->fppt, NULL);
> >> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPPT, SET_CMD, pwr_ctrl->sppt, NULL);
> >> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPPT_APU_ONLY, SET_CMD, pwr_ctrl->sppt_apu_only, NULL);
> >> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_MIN_LIMIT, SET_CMD, pwr_ctrl->stt_min, NULL);
> >> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_LIMIT_APU, SET_CMD,
> >> fixp_q88_fromint(pwr_ctrl->stt_skin_temp[STT_TEMP_APU]), NULL);
> >> - amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_LIMIT_HS2, false,
> >> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_LIMIT_HS2, SET_CMD,
> >> fixp_q88_fromint(pwr_ctrl->stt_skin_temp[STT_TEMP_HS2]), NULL);
> >>
> >> if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_SET_FAN_IDX))
> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/cnqf.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/cnqf.c
> >> index 207a0b33d8d3..5469fefb6001 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/cnqf.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/cnqf.c
> >> @@ -76,14 +76,14 @@ static int amd_pmf_set_cnqf(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, int src, int idx,
> >>
> >> pc = &config_store.mode_set[src][idx].power_control;
> >>
> >> - amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPL, false, pc->spl, NULL);
> >> - amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_FPPT, false, pc->fppt, NULL);
> >> - amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPPT, false, pc->sppt, NULL);
> >> - amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPPT_APU_ONLY, false, pc->sppt_apu_only, NULL);
> >> - amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_MIN_LIMIT, false, pc->stt_min, NULL);
> >> - amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_LIMIT_APU, false,
> >> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPL, SET_CMD, pc->spl, NULL);
> >> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_FPPT, SET_CMD, pc->fppt, NULL);
> >> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPPT, SET_CMD, pc->sppt, NULL);
> >> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_SPPT_APU_ONLY, SET_CMD, pc->sppt_apu_only, NULL);
> >> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_MIN_LIMIT, SET_CMD, pc->stt_min, NULL);
> >> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_LIMIT_APU, SET_CMD,
> >> fixp_q88_fromint(pc->stt_skin_temp[STT_TEMP_APU]), NULL);
> >> - amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_LIMIT_HS2, false,
> >> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_STT_LIMIT_HS2, SET_CMD,
> >> fixp_q88_fromint(pc->stt_skin_temp[STT_TEMP_HS2]), NULL);
> >>
> >> if (is_apmf_func_supported(dev, APMF_FUNC_SET_FAN_IDX))
> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> >> index bc544a4a5266..a659cedc4533 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> >> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static void amd_pmf_get_metrics(struct work_struct *work)
> >>
> >> /* Transfer table contents */
> >> memset(dev->buf, 0, sizeof(dev->m_table));
> >> - amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_TRANSFER_TABLE, 0, 7, NULL);
> >> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_TRANSFER_TABLE, SET_CMD, 7, NULL);
> >> memcpy(&dev->m_table, dev->buf, sizeof(dev->m_table));
> >>
> >> time_elapsed_ms = ktime_to_ms(ktime_get()) - dev->start_time;
> >> @@ -289,8 +289,8 @@ int amd_pmf_set_dram_addr(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, bool alloc_buffer)
> >> hi = phys_addr >> 32;
> >> low = phys_addr & GENMASK(31, 0);
> >>
> >> - amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH, 0, hi, NULL);
> >> - amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_DRAM_ADDR_LOW, 0, low, NULL);
> >> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH, SET_CMD, hi, NULL);
> >> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_DRAM_ADDR_LOW, SET_CMD, low, NULL);
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> >> index 6ea5380f3b23..19e413bd89bc 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> >> @@ -120,6 +120,9 @@ struct cookie_header {
> >> #define APTS_MAX_STATES 16
> >> #define CUSTOM_BIOS_INPUT_BITS GENMASK(16, 7)
> >>
> >> +#define SET_CMD 0
> >> +#define GET_CMD 1
> >
> > amd_pmf_send_cmd() takes bool so I don't know why these are defined as
> > numbers?
>
> The signature of amd_pmf_send_cmd() is:
>
> amd_pmf_send_cmd(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, u8 message, bool get, u32
> arg, u32 *data);
>
> However, in the code it’s called with mixed values for the get parameter:
>
> amd_pmf_send_cmd(…, …, true, …, …);
> amd_pmf_send_cmd(…, …, false, …, …);
> amd_pmf_send_cmd(…, …, 0, …, …);
>
> That inconsistency makes it harder to read. So, I think adding those
> two macros would be useful so callers can use explicit names instead
> of 0/1/true/false, which should improve clarity.
>
> If you don’t think this is worth doing, I’m fine dropping the change
> from this series.
No, no no. This is very good change, please don't drop it. I just didn't
understand why those defines don't have:
/* amd_pmf_send_cmd() get/set */
#define SET_CMD false
#define GET_CMD true
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-18 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-11 6:37 [PATCH v2 0/5] PMF NPU metrics cleanup, command flag cleanup, and amdxdna integration Shyam Sundar S K
2025-11-11 6:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Rename IPU metrics fields to NPU for consistency Shyam Sundar S K
2025-11-18 15:36 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-11-11 6:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Use explicit SET_CMD/GET_CMD flags in amd_pmf_send_cmd() Shyam Sundar S K
2025-11-18 15:41 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-11-18 17:03 ` Shyam Sundar S K
2025-11-18 17:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2025-11-11 6:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] platform/x86/amd/pmf: replace magic table id with METRICS_TABLE_ID Shyam Sundar S K
2025-11-18 15:44 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-11-11 6:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Introduce new interface to export NPU metrics Shyam Sundar S K
2025-11-18 15:54 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-11-11 6:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] accel/amdxdna: Provide real-time NPU power estimate via AMD PMF Shyam Sundar S K
2025-11-12 18:03 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-11-13 7:33 ` Shyam Sundar S K
2025-11-14 16:56 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-11-18 15:59 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-11-18 16:01 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-11-18 16:46 ` Shyam Sundar S K
2025-11-19 12:44 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-11-20 10:55 ` Shyam Sundar S K
2025-11-12 17:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] PMF NPU metrics cleanup, command flag cleanup, and amdxdna integration Mario Limonciello
2025-11-13 7:37 ` Shyam Sundar S K
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33a8d8c0-be1d-fd6c-68e7-5244635136af@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Patil.Reddy@amd.com \
--cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox