* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash
@ 2008-04-12 19:03 Ulf Samuelsson
2008-04-13 13:36 ` Stelian Pop
2008-04-18 7:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Samuelsson @ 2008-04-12 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes
Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@atmel.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: atmel-flash.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1841 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20080412/72ec5660/attachment.bin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash
2008-04-12 19:03 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash Ulf Samuelsson
@ 2008-04-13 13:36 ` Stelian Pop
2008-04-14 6:00 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2008-04-14 19:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-04-18 7:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stelian Pop @ 2008-04-13 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Le samedi 12 avril 2008 ? 21:03 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a ?crit :
> Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes
Is there any added value on using the atmel flash driver instead of the
standard CFI driver ? It surely doesn't have any on the SAM9/CAP9
boards, but I'm not sure of the older AT91RM9200.
Thanks,
--
Stelian Pop <stelian@popies.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash
2008-04-13 13:36 ` Stelian Pop
@ 2008-04-14 6:00 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2008-04-14 9:19 ` Stelian Pop
2008-04-14 19:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Samuelsson @ 2008-04-14 6:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
> Le samedi 12 avril 2008 ? 21:03 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a ?crit :
>> Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes
>
> Is there any added value on using the atmel flash driver instead of the
> standard CFI driver ? It surely doesn't have any on the SAM9/CAP9
> boards, but I'm not sure of the older AT91RM9200.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Stelian Pop <stelian@popies.net>
>
It is mainly time related.
This flash driver is well tested on the AT91RM9200EK.
The standard CFI driver is not.
While CFI should work, I do not have time to make a thorough test.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash
2008-04-14 6:00 ` Ulf Samuelsson
@ 2008-04-14 9:19 ` Stelian Pop
2008-04-14 11:15 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2008-04-14 11:18 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stelian Pop @ 2008-04-14 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Le lundi 14 avril 2008 ? 08:00 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a ?crit :
> > Le samedi 12 avril 2008 ? 21:03 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a ?crit :
> >> Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes
> >
> > Is there any added value on using the atmel flash driver instead of the
> > standard CFI driver ? It surely doesn't have any on the SAM9/CAP9
> > boards, but I'm not sure of the older AT91RM9200.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Stelian Pop <stelian@popies.net>
> >
>
>
> It is mainly time related.
> This flash driver is well tested on the AT91RM9200EK.
> The standard CFI driver is not.
> While CFI should work, I do not have time to make a thorough test.
Linux seems to use the CFI driver, just like every other SAM/CAP board,
so it should be safe to switch to the standard CFI driver.
The only remaining issue is testing, and I was hoping you could do this
as part of the new board porting. :)
Thanks,
--
Stelian Pop <stelian@popies.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash
2008-04-14 9:19 ` Stelian Pop
@ 2008-04-14 11:15 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2008-04-14 11:18 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Samuelsson @ 2008-04-14 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
>
> Le lundi 14 avril 2008 ? 08:00 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a ?crit :
>> > Le samedi 12 avril 2008 ? 21:03 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a ?crit :
>> >> Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes
>> >
>> > Is there any added value on using the atmel flash driver instead of the
>> > standard CFI driver ? It surely doesn't have any on the SAM9/CAP9
>> > boards, but I'm not sure of the older AT91RM9200.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > --
>> > Stelian Pop <stelian@popies.net>
>> >
>>
>>
>> It is mainly time related.
>> This flash driver is well tested on the AT91RM9200EK.
>> The standard CFI driver is not.
>> While CFI should work, I do not have time to make a thorough test.
>
> Linux seems to use the CFI driver, just like every other SAM/CAP board,
> so it should be safe to switch to the standard CFI driver.
>
> The only remaining issue is testing, and I was hoping you could do this
> as part of the new board porting. :)
>
This is not "porting of a new board".
This board support has existed for 3-4 years in the Atmel U-Boot.
Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash
2008-04-14 9:19 ` Stelian Pop
2008-04-14 11:15 ` Ulf Samuelsson
@ 2008-04-14 11:18 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD @ 2008-04-14 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 11:19 Mon 14 Apr , Stelian Pop wrote:
>
> Le lundi 14 avril 2008 ? 08:00 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a ?crit :
> > > Le samedi 12 avril 2008 ? 21:03 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a ?crit :
> > >> Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes
> > >
> > > Is there any added value on using the atmel flash driver instead of the
> > > standard CFI driver ? It surely doesn't have any on the SAM9/CAP9
> > > boards, but I'm not sure of the older AT91RM9200.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --
> > > Stelian Pop <stelian@popies.net>
> > >
> >
> >
> > It is mainly time related.
> > This flash driver is well tested on the AT91RM9200EK.
> > The standard CFI driver is not.
> > While CFI should work, I do not have time to make a thorough test.
>
> Linux seems to use the CFI driver, just like every other SAM/CAP board,
> so it should be safe to switch to the standard CFI driver.
I agree with Stelian, I prefer you use the CFI driver, but I known that
there is somme difference between then. Untill you've test and qualify the CFI
driver for the AT91RM9200EK. I'll ack your patch.
Best Regards,
J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash
2008-04-13 13:36 ` Stelian Pop
2008-04-14 6:00 ` Ulf Samuelsson
@ 2008-04-14 19:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2008-04-14 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
In message <1208093818.23686.11.camel@voyager.dsnet> you wrote:
>
> Le samedi 12 avril 2008 =E0 21:03 +0200, Ulf Samuelsson a =E9crit :
> > Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes
>
> Is there any added value on using the atmel flash driver instead of the
> standard CFI driver ? It surely doesn't have any on the SAM9/CAP9
> boards, but I'm not sure of the older AT91RM9200.
I don't think there is.
For the existing boards, the already exisitng values should be
sufficient, and for new boards we should use the CFI driver.
I intend to NAK new boards with CFI conformant flashes that don't use
the CFI driver unless thay have very good reasons.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"The more data I punch in this card, the lighter it becomes, and the
lower the mailing cost."
- Stan Kelly-Bootle, "The Devil's DP Dictionary"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash
2008-04-12 19:03 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash Ulf Samuelsson
2008-04-13 13:36 ` Stelian Pop
@ 2008-04-18 7:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2008-04-18 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
In message <1208027002.23686.7.camel@elrond.atmel.sweden> you wrote:
>
> Add ID codes for most recent Atmel NOR flashes
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@atmel.com>
Rejected. Please use the CFI driver for newly added code. For this,
such defines are not needed.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"There is such a fine line between genius and stupidity."
- David St. Hubbins, "Spinal Tap"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-18 7:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-04-12 19:03 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add support for Atmel flash Ulf Samuelsson
2008-04-13 13:36 ` Stelian Pop
2008-04-14 6:00 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2008-04-14 9:19 ` Stelian Pop
2008-04-14 11:15 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2008-04-14 11:18 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2008-04-14 19:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-04-18 7:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox