* [PATCH 1/4] memory: ti-gpmc: Fix build
2024-01-09 12:26 [PATCH 0/4] arm: mach-k3: am64: Add NAND configuration Roger Quadros
@ 2024-01-09 12:26 ` Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] mtd: rawnand: omap_gpmc: Use DT provided IO address Roger Quadros
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Roger Quadros @ 2024-01-09 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: trini, michael, dario.binacchi
Cc: nm, afd, vigneshr, praneeth, srk, r-gunasekaran, u-boot,
Roger Quadros
sys_proto.h no longer exists for K3 platform so drop it.
Include sizes.h to so SZ_16M is visible.
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
---
drivers/memory/ti-gpmc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/memory/ti-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/ti-gpmc.c
index 775e78c9a5..0b8674339e 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/ti-gpmc.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/ti-gpmc.c
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
*/
#include <asm/io.h>
-#include <asm/arch/sys_proto.h>
#include <clk.h>
#include <common.h>
#include <dm.h>
@@ -17,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/mtd/omap_gpmc.h>
#include <linux/ioport.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
#include "ti-gpmc.h"
enum gpmc_clk_domain {
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/4] mtd: rawnand: omap_gpmc: Use DT provided IO address
2024-01-09 12:26 [PATCH 0/4] arm: mach-k3: am64: Add NAND configuration Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] memory: ti-gpmc: Fix build Roger Quadros
@ 2024-01-09 12:26 ` Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm: mach-k3: am642: Define NAND boot device Roger Quadros
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Roger Quadros @ 2024-01-09 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: trini, michael, dario.binacchi
Cc: nm, afd, vigneshr, praneeth, srk, r-gunasekaran, u-boot,
Roger Quadros
For DM case we can get the NAND chip's IO address from DT
so we don't need to rely on CFG_SYS_NAND_BASE.
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_gpmc.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_gpmc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_gpmc.c
index 0e25bd5dc2..f827c578d9 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_gpmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_gpmc.c
@@ -8,13 +8,15 @@
#include <log.h>
#include <system-constants.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
-#include <dm/uclass.h>
+#include <dm.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
#include <asm/arch/mem.h>
#endif
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/ioport.h>
#include <linux/mtd/omap_gpmc.h>
#include <linux/mtd/nand_ecc.h>
#include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
@@ -1124,7 +1126,7 @@ int __maybe_unused omap_nand_switch_ecc(uint32_t hardware, uint32_t eccstrength)
* nand_scan about special functionality. See the defines for further
* explanation
*/
-int gpmc_nand_init(struct nand_chip *nand)
+int gpmc_nand_init(struct nand_chip *nand, void __iomem *nand_base)
{
int32_t gpmc_config = 0;
int cs = cs_next++;
@@ -1164,7 +1166,7 @@ int gpmc_nand_init(struct nand_chip *nand)
info->control = NULL;
info->cs = cs;
info->ws = wscfg[cs];
- info->fifo = (void __iomem *)CFG_SYS_NAND_BASE;
+ info->fifo = nand_base;
nand_set_controller_data(nand, &omap_nand_info[cs]);
nand->cmd_ctrl = omap_nand_hwcontrol;
nand->options |= NAND_NO_PADDING | NAND_CACHEPRG;
@@ -1214,9 +1216,16 @@ static int gpmc_nand_probe(struct udevice *dev)
{
struct nand_chip *nand = dev_get_priv(dev);
struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(nand);
+ struct resource res;
+ void __iomem *base;
int ret;
- gpmc_nand_init(nand);
+ ret = dev_read_resource(dev, 0, &res);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ base = devm_ioremap(dev, res.start, resource_size(&res));
+ gpmc_nand_init(nand, base);
ret = nand_scan(mtd, CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MAX_CHIPS);
if (ret)
@@ -1270,7 +1279,7 @@ void board_nand_init(void)
int board_nand_init(struct nand_chip *nand)
{
- return gpmc_nand_init(nand);
+ return gpmc_nand_init(nand, (void __iomem *)CFG_SYS_NAND_BASE);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SYS_NAND_SELF_INIT */
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH 3/4] arm: mach-k3: am642: Define NAND boot device
2024-01-09 12:26 [PATCH 0/4] arm: mach-k3: am64: Add NAND configuration Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/4] memory: ti-gpmc: Fix build Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] mtd: rawnand: omap_gpmc: Use DT provided IO address Roger Quadros
@ 2024-01-09 12:26 ` Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 19:17 ` [PATCH 0/4] arm: mach-k3: am64: Add NAND configuration Nishanth Menon
4 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Roger Quadros @ 2024-01-09 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: trini, michael, dario.binacchi
Cc: nm, afd, vigneshr, praneeth, srk, r-gunasekaran, u-boot,
Roger Quadros
AM642 SoC supports booting from GPMC NAND device.
Define boot device for it.
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm/mach-k3/am642_init.c | 3 +++
arch/arm/mach-k3/include/mach/am64_spl.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-k3/am642_init.c b/arch/arm/mach-k3/am642_init.c
index 6085379f1d..ddf47ef0a9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-k3/am642_init.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-k3/am642_init.c
@@ -348,6 +348,9 @@ static u32 __get_primary_bootmedia(u32 main_devstat)
case BOOT_DEVICE_EMMC:
return BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1;
+ case BOOT_DEVICE_NAND:
+ return BOOT_DEVICE_NAND;
+
case BOOT_DEVICE_MMC:
if ((bootmode_cfg & MAIN_DEVSTAT_PRIMARY_MMC_PORT_MASK) >>
MAIN_DEVSTAT_PRIMARY_MMC_PORT_SHIFT)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-k3/include/mach/am64_spl.h b/arch/arm/mach-k3/include/mach/am64_spl.h
index b4f396b2c0..a0a517019c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-k3/include/mach/am64_spl.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-k3/include/mach/am64_spl.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#define BOOT_DEVICE_USB 0x2A
#define BOOT_DEVICE_DFU 0x0A
+#define BOOT_DEVICE_NAND 0x0B
#define BOOT_DEVICE_GPMC_NOR 0x0C
#define BOOT_DEVICE_PCIE 0x0D
#define BOOT_DEVICE_XSPI 0x0E
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND
2024-01-09 12:26 [PATCH 0/4] arm: mach-k3: am64: Add NAND configuration Roger Quadros
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm: mach-k3: am642: Define NAND boot device Roger Quadros
@ 2024-01-09 12:26 ` Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 19:16 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-09 19:18 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-09 19:17 ` [PATCH 0/4] arm: mach-k3: am64: Add NAND configuration Nishanth Menon
4 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Roger Quadros @ 2024-01-09 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: trini, michael, dario.binacchi
Cc: nm, afd, vigneshr, praneeth, srk, r-gunasekaran, u-boot,
Roger Quadros
Enables configuration required for NAND in SPL and u-boot.
Enable MTD Driver model and MTD + UBI command line utilities.
Add mtdids/mtdparts for NAND as it is required for u-boot's
MTD subsystem commands to recognize NAND partitions.
Add u-boot partition location.
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
---
configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig b/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig
index 05e35a8db6..e22153a958 100644
--- a/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig
+++ b/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig
@@ -66,10 +66,15 @@ CONFIG_CMD_DFU=y
CONFIG_CMD_GPT=y
CONFIG_CMD_I2C=y
CONFIG_CMD_MMC=y
+CONFIG_CMD_MTD=y
CONFIG_CMD_USB=y
CONFIG_CMD_TIME=y
CONFIG_CMD_PMIC=y
CONFIG_CMD_REGULATOR=y
+CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS=y
+CONFIG_MTDIDS_DEFAULT="nand0=omap2-nand.0"
+CONFIG_MTDPARTS_DEFAULT="mtdparts=omap2-nand.0:2m(NAND.tiboot3),2m(NAND.tispl),2m(NAND.tiboot3.backup),4m(NAND.u-boot),256k(NAND.u-boot-env),256k(NAND.u-boot-env.backup),-(NAND.file-system)"
+CONFIG_CMD_UBI=y
CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y
CONFIG_SPL_OF_CONTROL=y
CONFIG_OF_LIST="k3-am642-evm k3-am642-sk"
@@ -107,6 +112,9 @@ CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI=y
CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ADMA=y
CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SDHCI_ADMA=y
CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_AM654=y
+CONFIG_MTD=y
+CONFIG_SPL_MTD=y
+CONFIG_DM_MTD=y
CONFIG_DM_SPI_FLASH=y
CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_SPANSION=y
CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_STMICRO=y
@@ -161,3 +169,27 @@ CONFIG_USB_GADGET_DOWNLOAD=y
CONFIG_USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE=y
CONFIG_SPL_DFU=y
CONFIG_FS_FAT_MAX_CLUSTSIZE=16384
+CONFIG_MEMORY=y
+CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY=y
+CONFIG_TI_GPMC=y
+CONFIG_MTD_RAW_NAND=y
+CONFIG_NAND_OMAP_GPMC=y
+CONFIG_CMD_NAND=y
+CONFIG_NAND_OMAP_ELM=y
+CONFIG_NAND_OMAP_ECCSCHEME_BCH8_CODE_HW=y
+CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BLOCK_SIZE=0x40000
+CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION=y
+CONFIG_SYS_NAND_PAGE_SIZE=0x1000
+CONFIG_SYS_NAND_PAGE_COUNT=0x40
+CONFIG_SYS_NAND_OOBSIZE=0x100
+CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT=y
+CONFIG_SPL_NAND_DRIVERS=y
+CONFIG_SPL_NAND_BASE=y
+CONFIG_SPL_NAND_IDENT=y
+CONFIG_SPL_NAND_ECC=y
+CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MAX_CHIPS=1
+CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE=1
+# CONFIG_SPL_NAND_AM33XX_BCH is not set
+CONFIG_SPL_MTD_SUPPORT=y
+CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_LOCATIONS=y
+CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_OFFS=0x600000
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND Roger Quadros
@ 2024-01-09 19:16 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-09 19:48 ` Tom Rini
2024-01-09 19:18 ` Nishanth Menon
1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2024-01-09 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roger Quadros
Cc: trini, michael, dario.binacchi, afd, vigneshr, praneeth, srk,
r-gunasekaran, u-boot
On 14:26-20240109, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Enables configuration required for NAND in SPL and u-boot.
>
> Enable MTD Driver model and MTD + UBI command line utilities.
>
> Add mtdids/mtdparts for NAND as it is required for u-boot's
> MTD subsystem commands to recognize NAND partitions.
>
> Add u-boot partition location.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
> ---
> configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig b/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig
> index 05e35a8db6..e22153a958 100644
> --- a/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig
> +++ b/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig
> @@ -66,10 +66,15 @@ CONFIG_CMD_DFU=y
> CONFIG_CMD_GPT=y
> CONFIG_CMD_I2C=y
> CONFIG_CMD_MMC=y
> +CONFIG_CMD_MTD=y
> CONFIG_CMD_USB=y
> CONFIG_CMD_TIME=y
> CONFIG_CMD_PMIC=y
> CONFIG_CMD_REGULATOR=y
> +CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS=y
> +CONFIG_MTDIDS_DEFAULT="nand0=omap2-nand.0"
> +CONFIG_MTDPARTS_DEFAULT="mtdparts=omap2-nand.0:2m(NAND.tiboot3),2m(NAND.tispl),2m(NAND.tiboot3.backup),4m(NAND.u-boot),256k(NAND.u-boot-env),256k(NAND.u-boot-env.backup),-(NAND.file-system)"
> +CONFIG_CMD_UBI=y
> CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y
> CONFIG_SPL_OF_CONTROL=y
> CONFIG_OF_LIST="k3-am642-evm k3-am642-sk"
> @@ -107,6 +112,9 @@ CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI=y
> CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ADMA=y
> CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SDHCI_ADMA=y
> CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_AM654=y
> +CONFIG_MTD=y
> +CONFIG_SPL_MTD=y
> +CONFIG_DM_MTD=y
> CONFIG_DM_SPI_FLASH=y
> CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_SPANSION=y
> CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_STMICRO=y
> @@ -161,3 +169,27 @@ CONFIG_USB_GADGET_DOWNLOAD=y
> CONFIG_USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE=y
> CONFIG_SPL_DFU=y
> CONFIG_FS_FAT_MAX_CLUSTSIZE=16384
> +CONFIG_MEMORY=y
> +CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY=y
> +CONFIG_TI_GPMC=y
> +CONFIG_MTD_RAW_NAND=y
> +CONFIG_NAND_OMAP_GPMC=y
> +CONFIG_CMD_NAND=y
> +CONFIG_NAND_OMAP_ELM=y
> +CONFIG_NAND_OMAP_ECCSCHEME_BCH8_CODE_HW=y
> +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BLOCK_SIZE=0x40000
> +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION=y
> +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_PAGE_SIZE=0x1000
> +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_PAGE_COUNT=0x40
> +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_OOBSIZE=0x100
> +CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT=y
> +CONFIG_SPL_NAND_DRIVERS=y
> +CONFIG_SPL_NAND_BASE=y
> +CONFIG_SPL_NAND_IDENT=y
> +CONFIG_SPL_NAND_ECC=y
> +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MAX_CHIPS=1
> +CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE=1
> +# CONFIG_SPL_NAND_AM33XX_BCH is not set
> +CONFIG_SPL_MTD_SUPPORT=y
> +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_LOCATIONS=y
> +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_OFFS=0x600000
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Why not a config fragment?
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND
2024-01-09 19:16 ` Nishanth Menon
@ 2024-01-09 19:48 ` Tom Rini
2024-01-09 20:00 ` Nishanth Menon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2024-01-09 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nishanth Menon
Cc: Roger Quadros, michael, dario.binacchi, afd, vigneshr, praneeth,
srk, r-gunasekaran, u-boot
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2922 bytes --]
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 01:16:27PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 14:26-20240109, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > Enables configuration required for NAND in SPL and u-boot.
> >
> > Enable MTD Driver model and MTD + UBI command line utilities.
> >
> > Add mtdids/mtdparts for NAND as it is required for u-boot's
> > MTD subsystem commands to recognize NAND partitions.
> >
> > Add u-boot partition location.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig b/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig
> > index 05e35a8db6..e22153a958 100644
> > --- a/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig
> > +++ b/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig
> > @@ -66,10 +66,15 @@ CONFIG_CMD_DFU=y
> > CONFIG_CMD_GPT=y
> > CONFIG_CMD_I2C=y
> > CONFIG_CMD_MMC=y
> > +CONFIG_CMD_MTD=y
> > CONFIG_CMD_USB=y
> > CONFIG_CMD_TIME=y
> > CONFIG_CMD_PMIC=y
> > CONFIG_CMD_REGULATOR=y
> > +CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS=y
> > +CONFIG_MTDIDS_DEFAULT="nand0=omap2-nand.0"
> > +CONFIG_MTDPARTS_DEFAULT="mtdparts=omap2-nand.0:2m(NAND.tiboot3),2m(NAND.tispl),2m(NAND.tiboot3.backup),4m(NAND.u-boot),256k(NAND.u-boot-env),256k(NAND.u-boot-env.backup),-(NAND.file-system)"
> > +CONFIG_CMD_UBI=y
> > CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y
> > CONFIG_SPL_OF_CONTROL=y
> > CONFIG_OF_LIST="k3-am642-evm k3-am642-sk"
> > @@ -107,6 +112,9 @@ CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI=y
> > CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ADMA=y
> > CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SDHCI_ADMA=y
> > CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_AM654=y
> > +CONFIG_MTD=y
> > +CONFIG_SPL_MTD=y
> > +CONFIG_DM_MTD=y
> > CONFIG_DM_SPI_FLASH=y
> > CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_SPANSION=y
> > CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_STMICRO=y
> > @@ -161,3 +169,27 @@ CONFIG_USB_GADGET_DOWNLOAD=y
> > CONFIG_USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE=y
> > CONFIG_SPL_DFU=y
> > CONFIG_FS_FAT_MAX_CLUSTSIZE=16384
> > +CONFIG_MEMORY=y
> > +CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY=y
> > +CONFIG_TI_GPMC=y
> > +CONFIG_MTD_RAW_NAND=y
> > +CONFIG_NAND_OMAP_GPMC=y
> > +CONFIG_CMD_NAND=y
> > +CONFIG_NAND_OMAP_ELM=y
> > +CONFIG_NAND_OMAP_ECCSCHEME_BCH8_CODE_HW=y
> > +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BLOCK_SIZE=0x40000
> > +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION=y
> > +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_PAGE_SIZE=0x1000
> > +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_PAGE_COUNT=0x40
> > +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_OOBSIZE=0x100
> > +CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT=y
> > +CONFIG_SPL_NAND_DRIVERS=y
> > +CONFIG_SPL_NAND_BASE=y
> > +CONFIG_SPL_NAND_IDENT=y
> > +CONFIG_SPL_NAND_ECC=y
> > +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MAX_CHIPS=1
> > +CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE=1
> > +# CONFIG_SPL_NAND_AM33XX_BCH is not set
> > +CONFIG_SPL_MTD_SUPPORT=y
> > +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_LOCATIONS=y
> > +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_OFFS=0x600000
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> Why not a config fragment?
To me, this makes sense to keep in the main config. It can be turned off
as needed, and at run time if it's not present, it's safe.
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND
2024-01-09 19:48 ` Tom Rini
@ 2024-01-09 20:00 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-09 20:35 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2024-01-09 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Rini
Cc: Roger Quadros, michael, dario.binacchi, afd, vigneshr, praneeth,
srk, r-gunasekaran, u-boot
On 14:48-20240109, Tom Rini wrote:
[...]
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
> >
> > Why not a config fragment?
>
> To me, this makes sense to keep in the main config. It can be turned off
> as needed, and at run time if it's not present, it's safe.
Three reasons:
* There is going to be duplication across multiple boards
* It confuses the affair of trying to find the minimal configuration needed
to boot the board.
* SRAM is limited already - we have been playing all kind of dances
around this - NAND is a daughter card addon - while I am not trying to
diminish NAND support, we are in a constant struggle to keep SRAM
viable and adding additional boot modes to a single config, IMHO is
the wrong direction to go.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND
2024-01-09 20:00 ` Nishanth Menon
@ 2024-01-09 20:35 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2024-01-09 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nishanth Menon
Cc: Roger Quadros, michael, dario.binacchi, afd, vigneshr, praneeth,
srk, r-gunasekaran, u-boot
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1086 bytes --]
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 02:00:14PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 14:48-20240109, Tom Rini wrote:
> [...]
> > > > --
> > > > 2.34.1
> > > >
> > >
> > > Why not a config fragment?
> >
> > To me, this makes sense to keep in the main config. It can be turned off
> > as needed, and at run time if it's not present, it's safe.
>
> Three reasons:
> * There is going to be duplication across multiple boards
> * It confuses the affair of trying to find the minimal configuration needed
> to boot the board.
> * SRAM is limited already - we have been playing all kind of dances
> around this - NAND is a daughter card addon - while I am not trying to
> diminish NAND support, we are in a constant struggle to keep SRAM
> viable and adding additional boot modes to a single config, IMHO is
> the wrong direction to go.
At the end of the day, I'll leave it to TI folks. I see that
drivers/mtd/Kconfig needs a whole lot of help as while I would have
hoped that turning off just CONFIG_MTD would undo most of the changes
here, it does not.
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND Roger Quadros
2024-01-09 19:16 ` Nishanth Menon
@ 2024-01-09 19:18 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-09 19:54 ` Tom Rini
1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2024-01-09 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roger Quadros
Cc: trini, michael, dario.binacchi, afd, vigneshr, praneeth, srk,
r-gunasekaran, u-boot
On 14:26-20240109, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Enables configuration required for NAND in SPL and u-boot.
>
> Enable MTD Driver model and MTD + UBI command line utilities.
>
> Add mtdids/mtdparts for NAND as it is required for u-boot's
> MTD subsystem commands to recognize NAND partitions.
>
> Add u-boot partition location.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
> ---
> configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig b/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig
> index 05e35a8db6..e22153a958 100644
> --- a/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig
> +++ b/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig
> @@ -66,10 +66,15 @@ CONFIG_CMD_DFU=y
> CONFIG_CMD_GPT=y
> CONFIG_CMD_I2C=y
> CONFIG_CMD_MMC=y
> +CONFIG_CMD_MTD=y
> CONFIG_CMD_USB=y
> CONFIG_CMD_TIME=y
> CONFIG_CMD_PMIC=y
> CONFIG_CMD_REGULATOR=y
> +CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS=y
> +CONFIG_MTDIDS_DEFAULT="nand0=omap2-nand.0"
> +CONFIG_MTDPARTS_DEFAULT="mtdparts=omap2-nand.0:2m(NAND.tiboot3),2m(NAND.tispl),2m(NAND.tiboot3.backup),4m(NAND.u-boot),256k(NAND.u-boot-env),256k(NAND.u-boot-env.backup),-(NAND.file-system)"
Why not handle this as device tree partitions?
> +CONFIG_CMD_UBI=y
> CONFIG_OF_CONTROL=y
> CONFIG_SPL_OF_CONTROL=y
> CONFIG_OF_LIST="k3-am642-evm k3-am642-sk"
> @@ -107,6 +112,9 @@ CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI=y
> CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ADMA=y
> CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SDHCI_ADMA=y
> CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_AM654=y
> +CONFIG_MTD=y
> +CONFIG_SPL_MTD=y
> +CONFIG_DM_MTD=y
> CONFIG_DM_SPI_FLASH=y
> CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_SPANSION=y
> CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_STMICRO=y
> @@ -161,3 +169,27 @@ CONFIG_USB_GADGET_DOWNLOAD=y
> CONFIG_USB_FUNCTION_MASS_STORAGE=y
> CONFIG_SPL_DFU=y
> CONFIG_FS_FAT_MAX_CLUSTSIZE=16384
> +CONFIG_MEMORY=y
> +CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY=y
> +CONFIG_TI_GPMC=y
> +CONFIG_MTD_RAW_NAND=y
> +CONFIG_NAND_OMAP_GPMC=y
> +CONFIG_CMD_NAND=y
> +CONFIG_NAND_OMAP_ELM=y
> +CONFIG_NAND_OMAP_ECCSCHEME_BCH8_CODE_HW=y
> +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BLOCK_SIZE=0x40000
> +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION=y
> +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_PAGE_SIZE=0x1000
> +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_PAGE_COUNT=0x40
> +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_OOBSIZE=0x100
> +CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT=y
> +CONFIG_SPL_NAND_DRIVERS=y
> +CONFIG_SPL_NAND_BASE=y
> +CONFIG_SPL_NAND_IDENT=y
> +CONFIG_SPL_NAND_ECC=y
> +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MAX_CHIPS=1
> +CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE=1
> +# CONFIG_SPL_NAND_AM33XX_BCH is not set
> +CONFIG_SPL_MTD_SUPPORT=y
> +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_LOCATIONS=y
> +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_OFFS=0x600000
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND
2024-01-09 19:18 ` Nishanth Menon
@ 2024-01-09 19:54 ` Tom Rini
2024-01-09 20:00 ` Francesco Dolcini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2024-01-09 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nishanth Menon
Cc: Roger Quadros, michael, dario.binacchi, afd, vigneshr, praneeth,
srk, r-gunasekaran, u-boot, Francesco Dolcini
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1613 bytes --]
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 01:18:59PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 14:26-20240109, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > Enables configuration required for NAND in SPL and u-boot.
> >
> > Enable MTD Driver model and MTD + UBI command line utilities.
> >
> > Add mtdids/mtdparts for NAND as it is required for u-boot's
> > MTD subsystem commands to recognize NAND partitions.
> >
> > Add u-boot partition location.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig b/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig
> > index 05e35a8db6..e22153a958 100644
> > --- a/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig
> > +++ b/configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig
> > @@ -66,10 +66,15 @@ CONFIG_CMD_DFU=y
> > CONFIG_CMD_GPT=y
> > CONFIG_CMD_I2C=y
> > CONFIG_CMD_MMC=y
> > +CONFIG_CMD_MTD=y
> > CONFIG_CMD_USB=y
> > CONFIG_CMD_TIME=y
> > CONFIG_CMD_PMIC=y
> > CONFIG_CMD_REGULATOR=y
> > +CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS=y
> > +CONFIG_MTDIDS_DEFAULT="nand0=omap2-nand.0"
> > +CONFIG_MTDPARTS_DEFAULT="mtdparts=omap2-nand.0:2m(NAND.tiboot3),2m(NAND.tispl),2m(NAND.tiboot3.backup),4m(NAND.u-boot),256k(NAND.u-boot-env),256k(NAND.u-boot-env.backup),-(NAND.file-system)"
>
> Why not handle this as device tree partitions?
I honestly forget what the preferred way of defining and passing NAND
partition information is these days. It might even be the funny case
that passing as cmdline args is "best" rather than fixed-partitions
binding?
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND
2024-01-09 19:54 ` Tom Rini
@ 2024-01-09 20:00 ` Francesco Dolcini
2024-01-09 20:22 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-10 9:34 ` Roger Quadros
0 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Francesco Dolcini @ 2024-01-09 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Rini
Cc: Nishanth Menon, Roger Quadros, michael, dario.binacchi, afd,
vigneshr, praneeth, srk, r-gunasekaran, u-boot, Francesco Dolcini
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 02:54:00PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 01:18:59PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 14:26-20240109, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > > CONFIG_CMD_PMIC=y
> > > CONFIG_CMD_REGULATOR=y
> > > +CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS=y
> > > +CONFIG_MTDIDS_DEFAULT="nand0=omap2-nand.0"
> > > +CONFIG_MTDPARTS_DEFAULT="mtdparts=omap2-nand.0:2m(NAND.tiboot3),2m(NAND.tispl),2m(NAND.tiboot3.backup),4m(NAND.u-boot),256k(NAND.u-boot-env),256k(NAND.u-boot-env.backup),-(NAND.file-system)"
> >
> > Why not handle this as device tree partitions?
>
> I honestly forget what the preferred way of defining and passing NAND
> partition information is these days. It might even be the funny case
> that passing as cmdline args is "best" rather than fixed-partitions
> binding?
According to past discussions [1] doing the fixup in U-Boot is not advised.
Using the command line or having the partition fixed in the DT are both
valid options.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230206224838.75963-1-francesco@dolcini.it/
Francesco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND
2024-01-09 20:00 ` Francesco Dolcini
@ 2024-01-09 20:22 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-10 9:34 ` Roger Quadros
1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2024-01-09 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Francesco Dolcini
Cc: Tom Rini, Roger Quadros, michael, dario.binacchi, afd, vigneshr,
praneeth, srk, r-gunasekaran, u-boot, Francesco Dolcini
On 21:00-20240109, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 02:54:00PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 01:18:59PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > > On 14:26-20240109, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > > > CONFIG_CMD_PMIC=y
> > > > CONFIG_CMD_REGULATOR=y
> > > > +CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS=y
> > > > +CONFIG_MTDIDS_DEFAULT="nand0=omap2-nand.0"
> > > > +CONFIG_MTDPARTS_DEFAULT="mtdparts=omap2-nand.0:2m(NAND.tiboot3),2m(NAND.tispl),2m(NAND.tiboot3.backup),4m(NAND.u-boot),256k(NAND.u-boot-env),256k(NAND.u-boot-env.backup),-(NAND.file-system)"
> > >
> > > Why not handle this as device tree partitions?
> >
> > I honestly forget what the preferred way of defining and passing NAND
> > partition information is these days. It might even be the funny case
> > that passing as cmdline args is "best" rather than fixed-partitions
> > binding?
>
> According to past discussions [1] doing the fixup in U-Boot is not advised.
>
> Using the command line or having the partition fixed in the DT are both
> valid options.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230206224838.75963-1-francesco@dolcini.it/
yup - also why I wonder why we cant depend on DT.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND
2024-01-09 20:00 ` Francesco Dolcini
2024-01-09 20:22 ` Nishanth Menon
@ 2024-01-10 9:34 ` Roger Quadros
2024-01-10 16:06 ` Roger Quadros
1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Roger Quadros @ 2024-01-10 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Francesco Dolcini, Tom Rini
Cc: Nishanth Menon, michael, dario.binacchi, afd, vigneshr, praneeth,
srk, r-gunasekaran, u-boot, Francesco Dolcini
On 09/01/2024 22:00, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 02:54:00PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 01:18:59PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> On 14:26-20240109, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>>> CONFIG_CMD_PMIC=y
>>>> CONFIG_CMD_REGULATOR=y
>>>> +CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS=y
>>>> +CONFIG_MTDIDS_DEFAULT="nand0=omap2-nand.0"
>>>> +CONFIG_MTDPARTS_DEFAULT="mtdparts=omap2-nand.0:2m(NAND.tiboot3),2m(NAND.tispl),2m(NAND.tiboot3.backup),4m(NAND.u-boot),256k(NAND.u-boot-env),256k(NAND.u-boot-env.backup),-(NAND.file-system)"
>>>
>>> Why not handle this as device tree partitions?
>>
>> I honestly forget what the preferred way of defining and passing NAND
>> partition information is these days. It might even be the funny case
>> that passing as cmdline args is "best" rather than fixed-partitions
>> binding?
>
> According to past discussions [1] doing the fixup in U-Boot is not advised.
>
> Using the command line or having the partition fixed in the DT are both
> valid options.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230206224838.75963-1-francesco@dolcini.it/
>
> Francesco
>
This was not about passing mtdparts to kernel but about getting 'mtdparts' command
to work at u-boot. I need to figure out why OF partition parser didn't work here.
For a start I didn't have CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS set. Maybe I'm missing something more.
--
cheers,
-roger
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND
2024-01-10 9:34 ` Roger Quadros
@ 2024-01-10 16:06 ` Roger Quadros
2024-01-10 16:30 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Roger Quadros @ 2024-01-10 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Francesco Dolcini, Tom Rini, Lukasz Majewski, Mattijs Korpershoek
Cc: Nishanth Menon, michael, dario.binacchi, afd, vigneshr, praneeth,
srk, r-gunasekaran, u-boot, Francesco Dolcini
+Lukasz & Mattijs
On 10/01/2024 11:34, Roger Quadros wrote:
>
>
> On 09/01/2024 22:00, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 02:54:00PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 01:18:59PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>>> On 14:26-20240109, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>>>> CONFIG_CMD_PMIC=y
>>>>> CONFIG_CMD_REGULATOR=y
>>>>> +CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS=y
>>>>> +CONFIG_MTDIDS_DEFAULT="nand0=omap2-nand.0"
>>>>> +CONFIG_MTDPARTS_DEFAULT="mtdparts=omap2-nand.0:2m(NAND.tiboot3),2m(NAND.tispl),2m(NAND.tiboot3.backup),4m(NAND.u-boot),256k(NAND.u-boot-env),256k(NAND.u-boot-env.backup),-(NAND.file-system)"
>>>>
>>>> Why not handle this as device tree partitions?
>>>
>>> I honestly forget what the preferred way of defining and passing NAND
>>> partition information is these days. It might even be the funny case
>>> that passing as cmdline args is "best" rather than fixed-partitions
>>> binding?
>>
>> According to past discussions [1] doing the fixup in U-Boot is not advised.
>>
>> Using the command line or having the partition fixed in the DT are both
>> valid options.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230206224838.75963-1-francesco@dolcini.it/
>>
>> Francesco
>>
>
> This was not about passing mtdparts to kernel but about getting 'mtdparts' command
> to work at u-boot. I need to figure out why OF partition parser didn't work here.
>
> For a start I didn't have CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS set. Maybe I'm missing something more.
>
The issue was the NAND driver was not setting chip->dev and chip->ofnode correctly.
Now 'mtd list' shows partitions from the DT.
But, 'dfu 0 nand list' still fails like so.
"mtdparts variable not set, see 'help mtdparts'"
Looks like dfu_nand driver doesn't fall back to OF partitions if mtdparts environment
is not defined.
Should we add OF partitions support to dfu_nand driver or is it deprecated
in favor of dfu_mtd driver?
--
cheers,
-roger
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND
2024-01-10 16:06 ` Roger Quadros
@ 2024-01-10 16:30 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2024-01-10 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roger Quadros
Cc: Francesco Dolcini, Lukasz Majewski, Mattijs Korpershoek,
Nishanth Menon, michael, dario.binacchi, afd, vigneshr, praneeth,
srk, r-gunasekaran, u-boot, Francesco Dolcini
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2264 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> +Lukasz & Mattijs
>
> On 10/01/2024 11:34, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 09/01/2024 22:00, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 02:54:00PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 01:18:59PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >>>> On 14:26-20240109, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>>>> CONFIG_CMD_PMIC=y
> >>>>> CONFIG_CMD_REGULATOR=y
> >>>>> +CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS=y
> >>>>> +CONFIG_MTDIDS_DEFAULT="nand0=omap2-nand.0"
> >>>>> +CONFIG_MTDPARTS_DEFAULT="mtdparts=omap2-nand.0:2m(NAND.tiboot3),2m(NAND.tispl),2m(NAND.tiboot3.backup),4m(NAND.u-boot),256k(NAND.u-boot-env),256k(NAND.u-boot-env.backup),-(NAND.file-system)"
> >>>>
> >>>> Why not handle this as device tree partitions?
> >>>
> >>> I honestly forget what the preferred way of defining and passing NAND
> >>> partition information is these days. It might even be the funny case
> >>> that passing as cmdline args is "best" rather than fixed-partitions
> >>> binding?
> >>
> >> According to past discussions [1] doing the fixup in U-Boot is not advised.
> >>
> >> Using the command line or having the partition fixed in the DT are both
> >> valid options.
> >>
> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230206224838.75963-1-francesco@dolcini.it/
> >>
> >> Francesco
> >>
> >
> > This was not about passing mtdparts to kernel but about getting 'mtdparts' command
> > to work at u-boot. I need to figure out why OF partition parser didn't work here.
> >
> > For a start I didn't have CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS set. Maybe I'm missing something more.
> >
>
> The issue was the NAND driver was not setting chip->dev and chip->ofnode correctly.
> Now 'mtd list' shows partitions from the DT.
> But, 'dfu 0 nand list' still fails like so.
> "mtdparts variable not set, see 'help mtdparts'"
>
> Looks like dfu_nand driver doesn't fall back to OF partitions if mtdparts environment
> is not defined.
>
> Should we add OF partitions support to dfu_nand driver or is it deprecated
> in favor of dfu_mtd driver?
I would rather not have to populate the env variable as that will lead
to confusion later on I fear (make a change and it's not populated
onward).
--
Tom
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm: mach-k3: am64: Add NAND configuration
2024-01-09 12:26 [PATCH 0/4] arm: mach-k3: am64: Add NAND configuration Roger Quadros
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND Roger Quadros
@ 2024-01-09 19:17 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-01-11 12:15 ` Roger Quadros
4 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Nishanth Menon @ 2024-01-09 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roger Quadros
Cc: trini, michael, dario.binacchi, afd, vigneshr, praneeth, srk,
r-gunasekaran, u-boot
On 14:26-20240109, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AM64-EVM [1] supports NAND via expansion card.
>
> This series fixes the GPMC memory and NAND drivers
> and provides NAND configuration for AM642 platform.
>
> The extension card support and NAND DT overlay is
> still missing so NAND is not yet functional just with
> this series.
>
> It was tested with NAND overlay [2] manually applied to base
> AM64-EVM DT.
>
> CI test results are available at
> https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/pull/460
>
> [1] https://www.ti.com/tool/TMDS64EVM
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230923080046.5373-2-rogerq@kernel.org/
>
> Roger Quadros (4):
> memory: ti-gpmc: Fix build
> mtd: rawnand: omap_gpmc: Use DT provided IO address
> arm: mach-k3: am642: Define NAND boot device
> configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND
>
> arch/arm/mach-k3/am642_init.c | 3 +++
> arch/arm/mach-k3/include/mach/am64_spl.h | 1 +
> configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/memory/ti-gpmc.c | 2 +-
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_gpmc.c | 19 ++++++++++----
> 5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Please update am64x documentation as well. People will need to know
how to actually build, flash and use it.
>
>
> base-commit: c2c598e87cfe56f5991730762c00733c5aa9a994
> prerequisite-patch-id: e0465f3e924302d1c4bd47f2129b4eb3bd9faead
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm: mach-k3: am64: Add NAND configuration
2024-01-09 19:17 ` [PATCH 0/4] arm: mach-k3: am64: Add NAND configuration Nishanth Menon
@ 2024-01-11 12:15 ` Roger Quadros
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Roger Quadros @ 2024-01-11 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nishanth Menon
Cc: trini, michael, dario.binacchi, afd, vigneshr, praneeth, srk,
r-gunasekaran, u-boot
On 09/01/2024 21:17, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 14:26-20240109, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> AM64-EVM [1] supports NAND via expansion card.
>>
>> This series fixes the GPMC memory and NAND drivers
>> and provides NAND configuration for AM642 platform.
>>
>> The extension card support and NAND DT overlay is
>> still missing so NAND is not yet functional just with
>> this series.
>>
>> It was tested with NAND overlay [2] manually applied to base
>> AM64-EVM DT.
>>
>> CI test results are available at
>> https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/pull/460
>>
>> [1] https://www.ti.com/tool/TMDS64EVM
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230923080046.5373-2-rogerq@kernel.org/
>>
>> Roger Quadros (4):
>> memory: ti-gpmc: Fix build
>> mtd: rawnand: omap_gpmc: Use DT provided IO address
>> arm: mach-k3: am642: Define NAND boot device
>> configs: am64x_evm_a53_defconfig: Enable NAND
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-k3/am642_init.c | 3 +++
>> arch/arm/mach-k3/include/mach/am64_spl.h | 1 +
>> configs/am64x_evm_a53_defconfig | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/memory/ti-gpmc.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/omap_gpmc.c | 19 ++++++++++----
>> 5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Please update am64x documentation as well. People will need to know
> how to actually build, flash and use it.
As NAND is not yet functional till we implement the extension card
support and add the NAND overlay. I'll limit this series to platform
& driver fixes and leave the defconfig and documentation
out for now.
>
>>
>>
>> base-commit: c2c598e87cfe56f5991730762c00733c5aa9a994
>> prerequisite-patch-id: e0465f3e924302d1c4bd47f2129b4eb3bd9faead
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
--
cheers,
-roger
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread