From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] remove the limit max_sectors_kb imposed on max_readahead_kb
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:25:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <384930723.12146@ustc.edu.cn> (raw)
Message-ID: <20070720112528.GC6300@mail.ustc.edu.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070720110743.GT11657@kernel.dk>
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 01:07:43PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20 2007, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > Remove the size limit max_sectors_kb imposed on max_readahead_kb.
> >
> > max_sectors_kb cannot grow larger than max_hw_sectors_kb, which can be
> > rather small for some disk drives.
>
> Please CC me on core block layer changes, thanks.
OK.
> The patch looks fine though! Your reasoning is a bit odd, though. I
> think the depency between the two is just wrong and ugly, so I agree it
> should go.
>
> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Thank you :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-20 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-20 10:07 [PATCH 0/6] readahead cleanups and interleaved readahead Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] compacting file_ra_state Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <p73y7hbux4d.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
2007-07-20 12:11 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 12:11 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 16:02 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <1184927207.20032.168.camel@twins>
2007-07-20 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-07-20 11:24 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 11:24 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] mmap read-around simplification Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] remove several readahead macros Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] remove the limit max_sectors_kb imposed on max_readahead_kb Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 11:07 ` Jens Axboe
2007-07-20 11:25 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2007-07-20 11:25 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] introduce radix_tree_scan_hole() Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] basic support of interleaved reads Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=384930723.12146@ustc.edu.cn \
--to=wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.