From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] virtio_serial: A char device for simple guest <-> host communication
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:33:40 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908050933.42709.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248717876-17630-2-git-send-email-amit.shah@redhat.com>
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:34:33 am Amit Shah wrote:
> We expose multiple char devices ("ports") for simple communication
> between the host userspace and guest.
Hi Amit,
OK, seems like it's time for some serious review. Below.
> +config VIRTIO_SERIAL
> + tristate "Virtio serial"
> + select VIRTIO
> + select VIRTIO_RING
> + help
> + Virtio serial device driver for simple guest and host communication
depends on VIRTIO
Do not "select VIRTIO_RING" -- this code doesn't explicitly rely on it.
> +struct virtio_serial_struct {
> + struct work_struct rx_work;
> + struct work_struct tx_work;
> + struct work_struct queue_work;
> + struct work_struct config_work;
> +
> + struct list_head port_head;
> +
> + struct virtio_device *vdev;
> + struct class *class;
> + struct virtqueue *in_vq, *out_vq;
> +
> + struct virtio_serial_config *config;
> +};
> +
> +/* This struct holds individual buffers received for each port */
> +struct virtio_serial_port_buffer {
> + struct list_head list;
> +
> + unsigned int len; /* length of the buffer */
> + unsigned int offset; /* offset in the buf from which to consume data */
> +
> + char *buf;
> +};
> +
> +/* This struct is put in each buffer that gets passed to userspace and
> + * vice-versa
> + */
> +struct virtio_serial_id {
> + u32 id; /* Port number */
> +};
> +
> +struct virtio_serial_port {
> + /* Next port in the list */
> + struct list_head next;
> +
> + /* Buffer management */
> + struct virtio_serial_port_buffer read_buf;
> + struct list_head readbuf_head;
> + struct completion have_data;
> +
> + /* Each port associates with a separate char device */
> + struct cdev cdev;
> + struct device *dev;
> +};
> +
> +static struct virtio_serial_struct virtserial;
> +
> +static int major = 60; /* from the experimental range */
This will obviously need to change before it goes in.
> +
> +static struct virtio_serial_port *get_port_from_id(u32 id)
> +{
> + struct virtio_serial_port *port;
> + struct list_head *ptr;
> +
> + list_for_each(ptr, &virtserial.port_head) {
> + port = list_entry(ptr, struct virtio_serial_port, next);
list_for_each_entry, same with the others.
> +static int get_id_from_port(struct virtio_serial_port *port)
> +{
> + struct virtio_serial_port *match;
> + struct list_head *ptr;
> +
> + list_for_each(ptr, &virtserial.port_head) {
> + match = list_entry(ptr, struct virtio_serial_port, next);
> +
> + if (match == port)
> + return MINOR(port->dev->devt);
> + }
> + return VIRTIO_SERIAL_BAD_ID;
> +}
Why does this exist? Seems weird to loop, given you have the pointer already?
> +
> +static struct virtio_serial_port *get_port_from_buf(char *buf)
> +{
> + u32 id;
> +
> + memcpy(&id, buf, sizeof(id));
> +
> + return get_port_from_id(id);
> +}
> +
> +
> +static ssize_t virtserial_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *offp)
> +{
> + struct list_head *ptr, *ptr2;
> + struct virtio_serial_port *port;
> + struct virtio_serial_port_buffer *buf;
> + ssize_t ret;
> +
> + port = filp->private_data;
> +
> + ret = -EINTR;
> + if (list_empty(&port->readbuf_head)) {
> + if (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
> + return -EAGAIN;
> +
> + if (wait_for_completion_interruptible(&port->have_data) < 0)
> + return ret;
> + }
I don't think this code works. What protects from two simultaneous readers?
Who resets the completion? It's more normal to use a waitqueue and
wait_event_interruptible().
> + list_for_each_safe(ptr, ptr2, &port->readbuf_head) {
> + buf = list_entry(ptr, struct virtio_serial_port_buffer, list);
> +
> + /* FIXME: other buffers further in this list might
> + * have data too
> + */
> + if (count > buf->len - buf->offset)
> + count = buf->len - buf->offset;
> +
> + ret = copy_to_user(ubuf, buf->buf + buf->offset, count);
> +
> + /* Return the number of bytes actually copied */
> + ret = count - ret;
> +
> + buf->offset += ret;
> +
> + if (buf->len - buf->offset == 0) {
> + list_del(&buf->list);
> + kfree(buf->buf);
> + kfree(buf);
> + }
> + /* FIXME: if there's more data requested and more data
> + * available, return it.
> + */
> + break;
There's nothing wrong with short reads here.
> + }
> + return ret;
This can return -EINTR; if you hadn't assigned ret = -EINTR unconditionally
above, gcc would have given you a warning about that path :)
> +}
> +
> +/* For data that exceeds PAGE_SIZE in size we should send it all in
> + * one sg to not unnecessarily split up the data. Also some (all?)
> + * vnc clients don't consume split data.
> + *
> + * If we are to keep PAGE_SIZE sized buffers, we then have to stack
> + * multiple of those in one virtio request. virtio-ring returns to us
> + * just one pointer for all the buffers. So use this struct to
> + * allocate the bufs in so that freeing this up later is easier.
> + */
> +struct vbuf {
> + char **bufs;
> + struct scatterlist *sg;
> + unsigned int nent;
> +};
> +
> +static ssize_t virtserial_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *offp)
> +{
> + struct virtqueue *out_vq;
> + struct virtio_serial_port *port;
> + struct virtio_serial_id id;
> + struct vbuf *vbuf;
> + size_t offset, size;
> + ssize_t ret;
> + int i, id_len;
> +
> + port = filp->private_data;
> + id.id = get_id_from_port(port);
> + out_vq = virtserial.out_vq;
> +
> + id_len = sizeof(id);
> +
> + ret = -EFBIG;
> + vbuf = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vbuf), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vbuf)
> + return ret;
-ENOMEM is normal here.
> +
> + /* Max. number of buffers clubbed together in one message */
> + vbuf->nent = (count + id_len + PAGE_SIZE - 1) / PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> + vbuf->bufs = kzalloc(vbuf->nent, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vbuf->bufs)
> + goto free_vbuf;
> +
> + vbuf->sg = kzalloc(vbuf->nent, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vbuf->sg)
> + goto free_bufs;
> + sg_init_table(vbuf->sg, vbuf->nent);
> +
> + i = 0; /* vbuf->bufs[i] */
> + offset = 0; /* offset in the user buffer */
> + while (count - offset) {
> + size = min(count - offset + id_len, PAGE_SIZE);
> + vbuf->bufs[i] = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vbuf->bufs[i]) {
> + ret = -EFBIG;
> + goto free_buffers;
> + }
> + if (id_len) {
> + memcpy(vbuf->bufs[i], &id, id_len);
> + size -= id_len;
> + }
> + ret = copy_from_user(vbuf->bufs[i] + id_len, ubuf + offset, size);
> + offset += size - ret;
> +
> + sg_set_buf(&vbuf->sg[i], vbuf->bufs[i], size - ret + id_len);
> + id_len = 0; /* Pass the port id only in the first buffer */
> + i++;
> + }
> + if (out_vq->vq_ops->add_buf(out_vq, vbuf->sg, i, 0, vbuf)) {
> + /* XXX: We can't send the buffer. Report failure */
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> + /* Tell Host to go! */
> + out_vq->vq_ops->kick(out_vq);
> +
> + /* We're expected to return the amount of data we wrote */
> + return offset;
> +free_buffers:
> + while (i--)
> + kfree(vbuf->bufs[i]);
> + kfree(vbuf->sg);
> +free_bufs:
> + kfree(vbuf->bufs);
> +free_vbuf:
> + kfree(vbuf);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static long virtserial_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl,
> + unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct virtio_serial_port *port;
> + long ret;
> +
> + port = filp->private_data;
> +
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + switch (ioctl) {
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
I thought -ENOTTY was normal for invalid ioctls? In which case, just don't
implement this function.
> +
> +static int virtserial_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> +{
> + filp->private_data = NULL;
> + return 0;
> +}
This seems redundant.
> +
> +static int virtserial_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> +{
> + struct cdev *cdev = inode->i_cdev;
> + struct virtio_serial_port *port;
> +
> + port = container_of(cdev, struct virtio_serial_port, cdev);
> +
> + filp->private_data = port;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int virtserial_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *wait)
> +{
> + pr_notice("%s\n", __func__);
> + return 0;
> +}
And you're going to want to implement this, too.
> +
> +static const struct file_operations virtserial_fops = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .open = virtserial_open,
> + .read = virtserial_read,
> + .write = virtserial_write,
> + .compat_ioctl = virtserial_ioctl,
> + .unlocked_ioctl = virtserial_ioctl,
> + .poll = virtserial_poll,
> + .release = virtserial_release,
> +};
> +
> +static void virtio_serial_queue_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct scatterlist sg[1];
> + struct virtqueue *vq;
> + char *buf;
> +
> + vq = virtserial.in_vq;
> + while (1) {
> + buf = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!buf)
> + break;
> +
> + sg_init_one(sg, buf, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> + if (vq->vq_ops->add_buf(vq, sg, 0, 1, buf) < 0) {
> + kfree(buf);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + vq->vq_ops->kick(vq);
> +}
> +
> +static void virtio_serial_rx_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct virtio_serial_port *port = NULL;
> + struct virtio_serial_port_buffer *buf;
> + struct virtqueue *vq;
> + char *tmpbuf;
> + unsigned int tmplen;
> +
> + vq = virtserial.in_vq;
> + while ((tmpbuf = vq->vq_ops->get_buf(vq, &tmplen))) {
> + port = get_port_from_buf(tmpbuf);
> + if (!port) {
> + /* No valid index at start of
> + * buffer. Drop it.
> + */
> + pr_debug("%s: invalid index in buffer, %c %d\n",
> + __func__, tmpbuf[0], tmpbuf[0]);
> + break;
leak?
> + }
> + buf = kzalloc(sizeof(struct virtio_serial_port_buffer),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!buf)
> + break;
> +
> + buf->buf = tmpbuf;
> + buf->len = tmplen;
> + buf->offset = sizeof(struct virtio_serial_id);
> + list_add_tail(&buf->list, &port->readbuf_head);
> +
> + complete(&port->have_data);
> + }
> + /* Allocate buffers for all the ones that got used up */
> + schedule_work(&virtserial.queue_work);
> +}
Why do the allocation in a separate workqueue?
> +
> +static void virtio_serial_tx_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct virtqueue *vq;
> + struct vbuf *vbuf;
> + unsigned int tmplen;
> + int i;
> +
> + vq = virtserial.out_vq;
> + while ((vbuf = vq->vq_ops->get_buf(vq, &tmplen))) {
> + for (i = 0; i < vbuf->nent; i++) {
> + kfree(vbuf->bufs[i]);
> + }
> + kfree(vbuf->bufs);
> + kfree(vbuf->sg);
> + kfree(vbuf);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void rx_intr(struct virtqueue *vq)
> +{
> + schedule_work(&virtserial.rx_work);
> +}
> +
> +static void tx_intr(struct virtqueue *vq)
> +{
> + schedule_work(&virtserial.tx_work);
> +}
> +
> +static void config_intr(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + schedule_work(&virtserial.config_work);
> +}
> +
> +static u32 virtserial_get_hot_add_port(struct virtio_serial_config *config)
> +{
> + u32 i;
> + u32 port_nr;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < virtserial.config->max_nr_ports / 32; i++) {
> + port_nr = ffs(config->ports_map[i] ^ virtserial.config->ports_map[i]);
> + if (port_nr)
> + break;
> + }
> + if (unlikely(!port_nr))
> + return VIRTIO_SERIAL_BAD_ID;
> +
> + /* We used ffs above */
> + port_nr--;
> +
> + /* FIXME: Do this only when add_port is successful */
> + virtserial.config->ports_map[i] |= 1U << port_nr;
> +
> + port_nr += i * 32;
> + return port_nr;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 virtserial_find_next_port(u32 *map, int *map_i)
> +{
> + u32 port_nr;
> +
> + while (1) {
> + port_nr = ffs(*map);
> + if (port_nr)
> + break;
> +
> + if (unlikely(*map_i >= virtserial.config->max_nr_ports / 32))
> + return VIRTIO_SERIAL_BAD_ID;
> + ++*map_i;
> + *map = virtserial.config->ports_map[*map_i];
> + }
> + /* We used ffs above */
> + port_nr--;
> +
> + /* FIXME: Do this only when add_port is successful / reset bit
> + * in config space if add_port was unsuccessful
> + */
> + *map &= ~(1U << port_nr);
> +
> + port_nr += *map_i * 32;
> + return port_nr;
> +}
> +
> +static int virtserial_add_port(u32 port_nr)
> +{
> + struct virtio_serial_port *port;
> + dev_t devt;
> + int ret;
> +
> + port = kzalloc(sizeof(struct virtio_serial_port), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!port)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + devt = MKDEV(major, port_nr);
> + cdev_init(&port->cdev, &virtserial_fops);
> +
> + ret = register_chrdev_region(devt, 1, "virtio-serial");
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pr_err("%s: error registering chrdev region, ret = %d\n",
> + __func__, ret);
> + goto free_cdev;
> + }
> + ret = cdev_add(&port->cdev, devt, 1);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pr_err("%s: error adding cdev, ret = %d\n", __func__, ret);
> + goto free_cdev;
> + }
> + port->dev = device_create(virtserial.class, NULL, devt, NULL,
> + "vmch%u", port_nr);
> + if (IS_ERR(port->dev)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(port->dev);
> + pr_err("%s: Error creating device, ret = %d\n", __func__, ret);
> + goto free_cdev;
> + }
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&port->readbuf_head);
> + init_completion(&port->have_data);
> +
> + list_add_tail(&port->next, &virtserial.port_head);
> +
> + pr_info("virtio-serial port found at id %u\n", port_nr);
> +
> + return 0;
> +free_cdev:
> + unregister_chrdev(major, "virtio-serial");
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static __u32 get_ports_map_size(__u32 max_ports)
> +{
> + return sizeof(__u32) * ((max_ports + 31) / 32);
> +}
The __ versions are for user-visible headers only.
> +
> +static void virtio_serial_config_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct virtio_serial_config *virtserconf;
> + struct virtio_device *vdev = virtserial.vdev;
> + u32 i, port_nr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + virtserconf = kmalloc(sizeof(struct virtio_serial_config) +
> + get_ports_map_size(virtserial.config->max_nr_ports),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + vdev->config->get(vdev,
> + offsetof(struct virtio_serial_config, nr_active_ports),
> + &virtserconf->nr_active_ports,
> + sizeof(virtserconf->nr_active_ports));
> + vdev->config->get(vdev,
> + offsetof(struct virtio_serial_config, ports_map),
> + virtserconf->ports_map,
> + get_ports_map_size(virtserial.config->max_nr_ports));
> +
> + /* Hot-add ports */
> + for (i = virtserial.config->nr_active_ports;
> + i < virtserconf->nr_active_ports; i++) {
> + port_nr = virtserial_get_hot_add_port(virtserconf);
> + if (port_nr == VIRTIO_SERIAL_BAD_ID)
> + continue;
> + ret = virtserial_add_port(port_nr);
> + if (!ret)
> + virtserial.config->nr_active_ports++;
> + }
> + kfree(virtserconf);
> +}
> +
> +static int virtserial_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + struct virtqueue *vqs[3];
3?
> + const char *vq_names[] = { "input", "output" };
> + vq_callback_t *vq_callbacks[] = { rx_intr, tx_intr };
> + u32 i, map;
> + int ret, map_i;
> + u32 max_nr_ports;
> +
> + vdev->config->get(vdev, offsetof(struct virtio_serial_config,
> + max_nr_ports),
> + &max_nr_ports,
> + sizeof(max_nr_ports));
> + virtserial.config = kmalloc(sizeof(struct virtio_serial_config)
> + + get_ports_map_size(max_nr_ports),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
kmalloc not checked.
> + virtserial.config->max_nr_ports = max_nr_ports;
> +
> + vdev->config->get(vdev, offsetof(struct virtio_serial_config,
> + nr_active_ports),
> + &virtserial.config->nr_active_ports,
> + sizeof(virtserial.config->nr_active_ports));
> + vdev->config->get(vdev,
> + offsetof(struct virtio_serial_config, ports_map),
> + virtserial.config->ports_map,
> + get_ports_map_size(max_nr_ports));
> +
> + virtserial.vdev = vdev;
> +
> + ret = vdev->config->find_vqs(vdev, 2, vqs, vq_callbacks, vq_names);
> + if (ret)
> + goto fail;
> +
> + virtserial.in_vq = vqs[0];
> + virtserial.out_vq = vqs[1];
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&virtserial.port_head);
> +
> + map_i = 0;
> + map = virtserial.config->ports_map[map_i];
> + for (i = 0; i < virtserial.config->nr_active_ports; i++) {
> + __u32 port_nr;
> +
> + port_nr = virtserial_find_next_port(&map, &map_i);
> + if (unlikely(port_nr == VIRTIO_SERIAL_BAD_ID))
> + continue;
> +
> + virtserial_add_port(port_nr);
> + }
> + INIT_WORK(&virtserial.rx_work, &virtio_serial_rx_work_handler);
> + INIT_WORK(&virtserial.tx_work, &virtio_serial_tx_work_handler);
> + INIT_WORK(&virtserial.queue_work, &virtio_serial_queue_work_handler);
> + INIT_WORK(&virtserial.config_work, &virtio_serial_config_work_handler);
> +
> + /* Allocate pages to fill the receive queue */
> + schedule_work(&virtserial.queue_work);
> +
> + return 0;
> +fail:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static void virtserial_remove_port_data(struct virtio_serial_port *port)
> +{
> + struct list_head *ptr, *ptr2;
> +
> + device_destroy(virtserial.class, port->dev->devt);
> + unregister_chrdev_region(port->dev->devt, 1);
> + cdev_del(&port->cdev);
> +
> + /* Remove the buffers in which we have unconsumed data */
> + list_for_each_safe(ptr, ptr2, &port->readbuf_head) {
> + struct virtio_serial_port_buffer *buf;
> +
> + buf = list_entry(ptr, struct virtio_serial_port_buffer, list);
> +
> + list_del(&buf->list);
> + kfree(buf->buf);
> + kfree(buf);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void virtserial_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + struct list_head *ptr, *ptr2;
> + char *buf;
> + int len;
> +
> + unregister_chrdev(major, "virtio-serial");
> + class_destroy(virtserial.class);
> +
> + cancel_work_sync(&virtserial.rx_work);
> +
> + /* Free up the unused buffers in the receive queue */
> + while ((buf = virtserial.in_vq->vq_ops->get_buf(virtserial.in_vq, &len)))
> + kfree(buf);
This won't quite work. get_buf gets *used* buffers. You need to track
buffers yourself and delete them after del_vqs.
> + vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
> +
> + list_for_each_safe(ptr, ptr2, &virtserial.port_head) {
> + struct virtio_serial_port *port;
> +
> + port = list_entry(ptr, struct virtio_serial_port, next);
> +
> + list_del(&port->next);
> + virtserial_remove_port_data(port);
> + kfree(port);
> + }
> + kfree(virtserial.config);
> +}
> +
> +static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> + { VIRTIO_ID_SERIAL, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID },
> + { 0 },
> +};
> +
> +static struct virtio_driver virtio_serial = {
> + // .feature_table = features,
> + // .feature_table_size = ARRAY_SIZE(features),
> + .driver.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> + .driver.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .id_table = id_table,
> + .probe = virtserial_probe,
> + .remove = virtserial_remove,
> + .config_changed = config_intr,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init init(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + virtserial.class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, "virtio-serial");
> + if (IS_ERR(virtserial.class)) {
> + pr_err("Error creating virtio-serial class\n");
> + ret = PTR_ERR(virtserial.class);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + ret = register_virtio_driver(&virtio_serial);
> + if (ret) {
> + class_destroy(virtserial.class);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit fini(void)
> +{
> + unregister_virtio_driver(&virtio_serial);
> +}
> +module_init(init);
> +module_exit(fini);
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(virtio, id_table);
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Virtio serial driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_serial.h b/include/linux/virtio_serial.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..025dcf1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_serial.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +#ifndef _LINUX_VIRTIO_SERIAL_H
> +#define _LINUX_VIRTIO_SERIAL_H
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/virtio_config.h>
> +
> +/* Guest kernel - Host interface */
> +
> +/* The ID for virtio serial */
> +#define VIRTIO_ID_SERIAL 7
> +
> +#define VIRTIO_SERIAL_BAD_ID (~(u32)0)
> +
> +struct virtio_serial_config {
> + __u32 max_nr_ports;
> + __u32 nr_active_ports;
> + __u32 ports_map[0 /* (max_nr_ports + 31) / 32 */];
> +};
> +
> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> +
> +/* Guest kernel - Guest userspace interface */
> +
> +/* IOCTL-related */
> +#define VIRTIO_SERIAL_IO 0xAF
??
Cheers,
Rusty.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/1] virtio_serial: A char device for simple guest <-> host communication
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:33:40 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908050933.42709.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248717876-17630-2-git-send-email-amit.shah@redhat.com>
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:34:33 am Amit Shah wrote:
> We expose multiple char devices ("ports") for simple communication
> between the host userspace and guest.
Hi Amit,
OK, seems like it's time for some serious review. Below.
> +config VIRTIO_SERIAL
> + tristate "Virtio serial"
> + select VIRTIO
> + select VIRTIO_RING
> + help
> + Virtio serial device driver for simple guest and host communication
depends on VIRTIO
Do not "select VIRTIO_RING" -- this code doesn't explicitly rely on it.
> +struct virtio_serial_struct {
> + struct work_struct rx_work;
> + struct work_struct tx_work;
> + struct work_struct queue_work;
> + struct work_struct config_work;
> +
> + struct list_head port_head;
> +
> + struct virtio_device *vdev;
> + struct class *class;
> + struct virtqueue *in_vq, *out_vq;
> +
> + struct virtio_serial_config *config;
> +};
> +
> +/* This struct holds individual buffers received for each port */
> +struct virtio_serial_port_buffer {
> + struct list_head list;
> +
> + unsigned int len; /* length of the buffer */
> + unsigned int offset; /* offset in the buf from which to consume data */
> +
> + char *buf;
> +};
> +
> +/* This struct is put in each buffer that gets passed to userspace and
> + * vice-versa
> + */
> +struct virtio_serial_id {
> + u32 id; /* Port number */
> +};
> +
> +struct virtio_serial_port {
> + /* Next port in the list */
> + struct list_head next;
> +
> + /* Buffer management */
> + struct virtio_serial_port_buffer read_buf;
> + struct list_head readbuf_head;
> + struct completion have_data;
> +
> + /* Each port associates with a separate char device */
> + struct cdev cdev;
> + struct device *dev;
> +};
> +
> +static struct virtio_serial_struct virtserial;
> +
> +static int major = 60; /* from the experimental range */
This will obviously need to change before it goes in.
> +
> +static struct virtio_serial_port *get_port_from_id(u32 id)
> +{
> + struct virtio_serial_port *port;
> + struct list_head *ptr;
> +
> + list_for_each(ptr, &virtserial.port_head) {
> + port = list_entry(ptr, struct virtio_serial_port, next);
list_for_each_entry, same with the others.
> +static int get_id_from_port(struct virtio_serial_port *port)
> +{
> + struct virtio_serial_port *match;
> + struct list_head *ptr;
> +
> + list_for_each(ptr, &virtserial.port_head) {
> + match = list_entry(ptr, struct virtio_serial_port, next);
> +
> + if (match == port)
> + return MINOR(port->dev->devt);
> + }
> + return VIRTIO_SERIAL_BAD_ID;
> +}
Why does this exist? Seems weird to loop, given you have the pointer already?
> +
> +static struct virtio_serial_port *get_port_from_buf(char *buf)
> +{
> + u32 id;
> +
> + memcpy(&id, buf, sizeof(id));
> +
> + return get_port_from_id(id);
> +}
> +
> +
> +static ssize_t virtserial_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *offp)
> +{
> + struct list_head *ptr, *ptr2;
> + struct virtio_serial_port *port;
> + struct virtio_serial_port_buffer *buf;
> + ssize_t ret;
> +
> + port = filp->private_data;
> +
> + ret = -EINTR;
> + if (list_empty(&port->readbuf_head)) {
> + if (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
> + return -EAGAIN;
> +
> + if (wait_for_completion_interruptible(&port->have_data) < 0)
> + return ret;
> + }
I don't think this code works. What protects from two simultaneous readers?
Who resets the completion? It's more normal to use a waitqueue and
wait_event_interruptible().
> + list_for_each_safe(ptr, ptr2, &port->readbuf_head) {
> + buf = list_entry(ptr, struct virtio_serial_port_buffer, list);
> +
> + /* FIXME: other buffers further in this list might
> + * have data too
> + */
> + if (count > buf->len - buf->offset)
> + count = buf->len - buf->offset;
> +
> + ret = copy_to_user(ubuf, buf->buf + buf->offset, count);
> +
> + /* Return the number of bytes actually copied */
> + ret = count - ret;
> +
> + buf->offset += ret;
> +
> + if (buf->len - buf->offset == 0) {
> + list_del(&buf->list);
> + kfree(buf->buf);
> + kfree(buf);
> + }
> + /* FIXME: if there's more data requested and more data
> + * available, return it.
> + */
> + break;
There's nothing wrong with short reads here.
> + }
> + return ret;
This can return -EINTR; if you hadn't assigned ret = -EINTR unconditionally
above, gcc would have given you a warning about that path :)
> +}
> +
> +/* For data that exceeds PAGE_SIZE in size we should send it all in
> + * one sg to not unnecessarily split up the data. Also some (all?)
> + * vnc clients don't consume split data.
> + *
> + * If we are to keep PAGE_SIZE sized buffers, we then have to stack
> + * multiple of those in one virtio request. virtio-ring returns to us
> + * just one pointer for all the buffers. So use this struct to
> + * allocate the bufs in so that freeing this up later is easier.
> + */
> +struct vbuf {
> + char **bufs;
> + struct scatterlist *sg;
> + unsigned int nent;
> +};
> +
> +static ssize_t virtserial_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *offp)
> +{
> + struct virtqueue *out_vq;
> + struct virtio_serial_port *port;
> + struct virtio_serial_id id;
> + struct vbuf *vbuf;
> + size_t offset, size;
> + ssize_t ret;
> + int i, id_len;
> +
> + port = filp->private_data;
> + id.id = get_id_from_port(port);
> + out_vq = virtserial.out_vq;
> +
> + id_len = sizeof(id);
> +
> + ret = -EFBIG;
> + vbuf = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vbuf), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vbuf)
> + return ret;
-ENOMEM is normal here.
> +
> + /* Max. number of buffers clubbed together in one message */
> + vbuf->nent = (count + id_len + PAGE_SIZE - 1) / PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> + vbuf->bufs = kzalloc(vbuf->nent, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vbuf->bufs)
> + goto free_vbuf;
> +
> + vbuf->sg = kzalloc(vbuf->nent, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vbuf->sg)
> + goto free_bufs;
> + sg_init_table(vbuf->sg, vbuf->nent);
> +
> + i = 0; /* vbuf->bufs[i] */
> + offset = 0; /* offset in the user buffer */
> + while (count - offset) {
> + size = min(count - offset + id_len, PAGE_SIZE);
> + vbuf->bufs[i] = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vbuf->bufs[i]) {
> + ret = -EFBIG;
> + goto free_buffers;
> + }
> + if (id_len) {
> + memcpy(vbuf->bufs[i], &id, id_len);
> + size -= id_len;
> + }
> + ret = copy_from_user(vbuf->bufs[i] + id_len, ubuf + offset, size);
> + offset += size - ret;
> +
> + sg_set_buf(&vbuf->sg[i], vbuf->bufs[i], size - ret + id_len);
> + id_len = 0; /* Pass the port id only in the first buffer */
> + i++;
> + }
> + if (out_vq->vq_ops->add_buf(out_vq, vbuf->sg, i, 0, vbuf)) {
> + /* XXX: We can't send the buffer. Report failure */
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> + /* Tell Host to go! */
> + out_vq->vq_ops->kick(out_vq);
> +
> + /* We're expected to return the amount of data we wrote */
> + return offset;
> +free_buffers:
> + while (i--)
> + kfree(vbuf->bufs[i]);
> + kfree(vbuf->sg);
> +free_bufs:
> + kfree(vbuf->bufs);
> +free_vbuf:
> + kfree(vbuf);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static long virtserial_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl,
> + unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct virtio_serial_port *port;
> + long ret;
> +
> + port = filp->private_data;
> +
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + switch (ioctl) {
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
I thought -ENOTTY was normal for invalid ioctls? In which case, just don't
implement this function.
> +
> +static int virtserial_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> +{
> + filp->private_data = NULL;
> + return 0;
> +}
This seems redundant.
> +
> +static int virtserial_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> +{
> + struct cdev *cdev = inode->i_cdev;
> + struct virtio_serial_port *port;
> +
> + port = container_of(cdev, struct virtio_serial_port, cdev);
> +
> + filp->private_data = port;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int virtserial_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *wait)
> +{
> + pr_notice("%s\n", __func__);
> + return 0;
> +}
And you're going to want to implement this, too.
> +
> +static const struct file_operations virtserial_fops = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .open = virtserial_open,
> + .read = virtserial_read,
> + .write = virtserial_write,
> + .compat_ioctl = virtserial_ioctl,
> + .unlocked_ioctl = virtserial_ioctl,
> + .poll = virtserial_poll,
> + .release = virtserial_release,
> +};
> +
> +static void virtio_serial_queue_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct scatterlist sg[1];
> + struct virtqueue *vq;
> + char *buf;
> +
> + vq = virtserial.in_vq;
> + while (1) {
> + buf = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!buf)
> + break;
> +
> + sg_init_one(sg, buf, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> + if (vq->vq_ops->add_buf(vq, sg, 0, 1, buf) < 0) {
> + kfree(buf);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + vq->vq_ops->kick(vq);
> +}
> +
> +static void virtio_serial_rx_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct virtio_serial_port *port = NULL;
> + struct virtio_serial_port_buffer *buf;
> + struct virtqueue *vq;
> + char *tmpbuf;
> + unsigned int tmplen;
> +
> + vq = virtserial.in_vq;
> + while ((tmpbuf = vq->vq_ops->get_buf(vq, &tmplen))) {
> + port = get_port_from_buf(tmpbuf);
> + if (!port) {
> + /* No valid index at start of
> + * buffer. Drop it.
> + */
> + pr_debug("%s: invalid index in buffer, %c %d\n",
> + __func__, tmpbuf[0], tmpbuf[0]);
> + break;
leak?
> + }
> + buf = kzalloc(sizeof(struct virtio_serial_port_buffer),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!buf)
> + break;
> +
> + buf->buf = tmpbuf;
> + buf->len = tmplen;
> + buf->offset = sizeof(struct virtio_serial_id);
> + list_add_tail(&buf->list, &port->readbuf_head);
> +
> + complete(&port->have_data);
> + }
> + /* Allocate buffers for all the ones that got used up */
> + schedule_work(&virtserial.queue_work);
> +}
Why do the allocation in a separate workqueue?
> +
> +static void virtio_serial_tx_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct virtqueue *vq;
> + struct vbuf *vbuf;
> + unsigned int tmplen;
> + int i;
> +
> + vq = virtserial.out_vq;
> + while ((vbuf = vq->vq_ops->get_buf(vq, &tmplen))) {
> + for (i = 0; i < vbuf->nent; i++) {
> + kfree(vbuf->bufs[i]);
> + }
> + kfree(vbuf->bufs);
> + kfree(vbuf->sg);
> + kfree(vbuf);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void rx_intr(struct virtqueue *vq)
> +{
> + schedule_work(&virtserial.rx_work);
> +}
> +
> +static void tx_intr(struct virtqueue *vq)
> +{
> + schedule_work(&virtserial.tx_work);
> +}
> +
> +static void config_intr(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + schedule_work(&virtserial.config_work);
> +}
> +
> +static u32 virtserial_get_hot_add_port(struct virtio_serial_config *config)
> +{
> + u32 i;
> + u32 port_nr;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < virtserial.config->max_nr_ports / 32; i++) {
> + port_nr = ffs(config->ports_map[i] ^ virtserial.config->ports_map[i]);
> + if (port_nr)
> + break;
> + }
> + if (unlikely(!port_nr))
> + return VIRTIO_SERIAL_BAD_ID;
> +
> + /* We used ffs above */
> + port_nr--;
> +
> + /* FIXME: Do this only when add_port is successful */
> + virtserial.config->ports_map[i] |= 1U << port_nr;
> +
> + port_nr += i * 32;
> + return port_nr;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 virtserial_find_next_port(u32 *map, int *map_i)
> +{
> + u32 port_nr;
> +
> + while (1) {
> + port_nr = ffs(*map);
> + if (port_nr)
> + break;
> +
> + if (unlikely(*map_i >= virtserial.config->max_nr_ports / 32))
> + return VIRTIO_SERIAL_BAD_ID;
> + ++*map_i;
> + *map = virtserial.config->ports_map[*map_i];
> + }
> + /* We used ffs above */
> + port_nr--;
> +
> + /* FIXME: Do this only when add_port is successful / reset bit
> + * in config space if add_port was unsuccessful
> + */
> + *map &= ~(1U << port_nr);
> +
> + port_nr += *map_i * 32;
> + return port_nr;
> +}
> +
> +static int virtserial_add_port(u32 port_nr)
> +{
> + struct virtio_serial_port *port;
> + dev_t devt;
> + int ret;
> +
> + port = kzalloc(sizeof(struct virtio_serial_port), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!port)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + devt = MKDEV(major, port_nr);
> + cdev_init(&port->cdev, &virtserial_fops);
> +
> + ret = register_chrdev_region(devt, 1, "virtio-serial");
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pr_err("%s: error registering chrdev region, ret = %d\n",
> + __func__, ret);
> + goto free_cdev;
> + }
> + ret = cdev_add(&port->cdev, devt, 1);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pr_err("%s: error adding cdev, ret = %d\n", __func__, ret);
> + goto free_cdev;
> + }
> + port->dev = device_create(virtserial.class, NULL, devt, NULL,
> + "vmch%u", port_nr);
> + if (IS_ERR(port->dev)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(port->dev);
> + pr_err("%s: Error creating device, ret = %d\n", __func__, ret);
> + goto free_cdev;
> + }
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&port->readbuf_head);
> + init_completion(&port->have_data);
> +
> + list_add_tail(&port->next, &virtserial.port_head);
> +
> + pr_info("virtio-serial port found at id %u\n", port_nr);
> +
> + return 0;
> +free_cdev:
> + unregister_chrdev(major, "virtio-serial");
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static __u32 get_ports_map_size(__u32 max_ports)
> +{
> + return sizeof(__u32) * ((max_ports + 31) / 32);
> +}
The __ versions are for user-visible headers only.
> +
> +static void virtio_serial_config_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct virtio_serial_config *virtserconf;
> + struct virtio_device *vdev = virtserial.vdev;
> + u32 i, port_nr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + virtserconf = kmalloc(sizeof(struct virtio_serial_config) +
> + get_ports_map_size(virtserial.config->max_nr_ports),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + vdev->config->get(vdev,
> + offsetof(struct virtio_serial_config, nr_active_ports),
> + &virtserconf->nr_active_ports,
> + sizeof(virtserconf->nr_active_ports));
> + vdev->config->get(vdev,
> + offsetof(struct virtio_serial_config, ports_map),
> + virtserconf->ports_map,
> + get_ports_map_size(virtserial.config->max_nr_ports));
> +
> + /* Hot-add ports */
> + for (i = virtserial.config->nr_active_ports;
> + i < virtserconf->nr_active_ports; i++) {
> + port_nr = virtserial_get_hot_add_port(virtserconf);
> + if (port_nr == VIRTIO_SERIAL_BAD_ID)
> + continue;
> + ret = virtserial_add_port(port_nr);
> + if (!ret)
> + virtserial.config->nr_active_ports++;
> + }
> + kfree(virtserconf);
> +}
> +
> +static int virtserial_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + struct virtqueue *vqs[3];
3?
> + const char *vq_names[] = { "input", "output" };
> + vq_callback_t *vq_callbacks[] = { rx_intr, tx_intr };
> + u32 i, map;
> + int ret, map_i;
> + u32 max_nr_ports;
> +
> + vdev->config->get(vdev, offsetof(struct virtio_serial_config,
> + max_nr_ports),
> + &max_nr_ports,
> + sizeof(max_nr_ports));
> + virtserial.config = kmalloc(sizeof(struct virtio_serial_config)
> + + get_ports_map_size(max_nr_ports),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
kmalloc not checked.
> + virtserial.config->max_nr_ports = max_nr_ports;
> +
> + vdev->config->get(vdev, offsetof(struct virtio_serial_config,
> + nr_active_ports),
> + &virtserial.config->nr_active_ports,
> + sizeof(virtserial.config->nr_active_ports));
> + vdev->config->get(vdev,
> + offsetof(struct virtio_serial_config, ports_map),
> + virtserial.config->ports_map,
> + get_ports_map_size(max_nr_ports));
> +
> + virtserial.vdev = vdev;
> +
> + ret = vdev->config->find_vqs(vdev, 2, vqs, vq_callbacks, vq_names);
> + if (ret)
> + goto fail;
> +
> + virtserial.in_vq = vqs[0];
> + virtserial.out_vq = vqs[1];
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&virtserial.port_head);
> +
> + map_i = 0;
> + map = virtserial.config->ports_map[map_i];
> + for (i = 0; i < virtserial.config->nr_active_ports; i++) {
> + __u32 port_nr;
> +
> + port_nr = virtserial_find_next_port(&map, &map_i);
> + if (unlikely(port_nr == VIRTIO_SERIAL_BAD_ID))
> + continue;
> +
> + virtserial_add_port(port_nr);
> + }
> + INIT_WORK(&virtserial.rx_work, &virtio_serial_rx_work_handler);
> + INIT_WORK(&virtserial.tx_work, &virtio_serial_tx_work_handler);
> + INIT_WORK(&virtserial.queue_work, &virtio_serial_queue_work_handler);
> + INIT_WORK(&virtserial.config_work, &virtio_serial_config_work_handler);
> +
> + /* Allocate pages to fill the receive queue */
> + schedule_work(&virtserial.queue_work);
> +
> + return 0;
> +fail:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static void virtserial_remove_port_data(struct virtio_serial_port *port)
> +{
> + struct list_head *ptr, *ptr2;
> +
> + device_destroy(virtserial.class, port->dev->devt);
> + unregister_chrdev_region(port->dev->devt, 1);
> + cdev_del(&port->cdev);
> +
> + /* Remove the buffers in which we have unconsumed data */
> + list_for_each_safe(ptr, ptr2, &port->readbuf_head) {
> + struct virtio_serial_port_buffer *buf;
> +
> + buf = list_entry(ptr, struct virtio_serial_port_buffer, list);
> +
> + list_del(&buf->list);
> + kfree(buf->buf);
> + kfree(buf);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void virtserial_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> + struct list_head *ptr, *ptr2;
> + char *buf;
> + int len;
> +
> + unregister_chrdev(major, "virtio-serial");
> + class_destroy(virtserial.class);
> +
> + cancel_work_sync(&virtserial.rx_work);
> +
> + /* Free up the unused buffers in the receive queue */
> + while ((buf = virtserial.in_vq->vq_ops->get_buf(virtserial.in_vq, &len)))
> + kfree(buf);
This won't quite work. get_buf gets *used* buffers. You need to track
buffers yourself and delete them after del_vqs.
> + vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
> +
> + list_for_each_safe(ptr, ptr2, &virtserial.port_head) {
> + struct virtio_serial_port *port;
> +
> + port = list_entry(ptr, struct virtio_serial_port, next);
> +
> + list_del(&port->next);
> + virtserial_remove_port_data(port);
> + kfree(port);
> + }
> + kfree(virtserial.config);
> +}
> +
> +static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> + { VIRTIO_ID_SERIAL, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID },
> + { 0 },
> +};
> +
> +static struct virtio_driver virtio_serial = {
> + // .feature_table = features,
> + // .feature_table_size = ARRAY_SIZE(features),
> + .driver.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> + .driver.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .id_table = id_table,
> + .probe = virtserial_probe,
> + .remove = virtserial_remove,
> + .config_changed = config_intr,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init init(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + virtserial.class = class_create(THIS_MODULE, "virtio-serial");
> + if (IS_ERR(virtserial.class)) {
> + pr_err("Error creating virtio-serial class\n");
> + ret = PTR_ERR(virtserial.class);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + ret = register_virtio_driver(&virtio_serial);
> + if (ret) {
> + class_destroy(virtserial.class);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit fini(void)
> +{
> + unregister_virtio_driver(&virtio_serial);
> +}
> +module_init(init);
> +module_exit(fini);
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(virtio, id_table);
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Virtio serial driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_serial.h b/include/linux/virtio_serial.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..025dcf1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_serial.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +#ifndef _LINUX_VIRTIO_SERIAL_H
> +#define _LINUX_VIRTIO_SERIAL_H
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/virtio_config.h>
> +
> +/* Guest kernel - Host interface */
> +
> +/* The ID for virtio serial */
> +#define VIRTIO_ID_SERIAL 7
> +
> +#define VIRTIO_SERIAL_BAD_ID (~(u32)0)
> +
> +struct virtio_serial_config {
> + __u32 max_nr_ports;
> + __u32 nr_active_ports;
> + __u32 ports_map[0 /* (max_nr_ports + 31) / 32 */];
> +};
> +
> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> +
> +/* Guest kernel - Guest userspace interface */
> +
> +/* IOCTL-related */
> +#define VIRTIO_SERIAL_IO 0xAF
??
Cheers,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-05 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 175+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-27 18:04 virtio-serial: An interface for host-guest communication Amit Shah
2009-07-27 18:04 ` [Qemu-devel] " Amit Shah
2009-07-27 18:04 ` [PATCH 1/1] virtio_serial: A char device for simple guest <-> host communication Amit Shah
2009-07-27 18:04 ` [Qemu-devel] " Amit Shah
2009-07-27 18:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] virtio-serial: virtio device for simple host <-> guest communication Amit Shah
2009-07-27 18:04 ` [Qemu-devel] " Amit Shah
2009-07-27 18:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] vnc: add a is_vnc_active() helper Amit Shah
2009-07-27 18:04 ` Amit Shah
2009-07-27 18:04 ` [Qemu-devel] " Amit Shah
2009-07-27 18:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] virtio-serial: vnc: support for sending / receiving guest clipboard Amit Shah
2009-07-27 18:04 ` Amit Shah
2009-07-27 18:04 ` [Qemu-devel] " Amit Shah
2009-07-27 18:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] virtio-serial: virtio device for simple host <-> guest communication Amit Shah
2009-08-05 0:03 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-08-05 0:03 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/1] virtio_serial: A char device for simple guest <-> host communication Rusty Russell
2009-08-05 5:12 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-05 5:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " Amit Shah
2009-08-05 9:58 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-05 9:58 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-05 9:58 ` [Qemu-devel] " Amit Shah
2009-08-05 0:03 ` Rusty Russell
2009-07-27 18:04 ` Amit Shah
2009-07-27 20:22 ` virtio-serial: An interface for host-guest communication Anthony Liguori
2009-07-27 20:22 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2009-07-27 20:32 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-07-27 20:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-27 20:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-27 20:46 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-27 20:46 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-27 23:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-27 23:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-27 23:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-28 10:36 ` Amit Shah
2009-07-28 10:36 ` Amit Shah
2009-07-28 10:36 ` Amit Shah
2009-07-28 13:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-28 13:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-29 7:44 ` Amit Shah
2009-07-29 7:44 ` Amit Shah
2009-07-29 7:48 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-07-29 7:48 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-07-29 7:48 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-08-05 18:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-05 18:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-05 18:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-29 7:44 ` Amit Shah
2009-07-28 14:00 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2009-07-28 14:00 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2009-07-28 14:48 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-28 14:48 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-28 14:55 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2009-07-28 14:55 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2009-07-28 15:00 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-28 15:00 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-03 19:57 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-05 17:57 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-05 17:57 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-05 18:00 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-05 18:00 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-05 18:00 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-06 10:38 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-06 10:38 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-06 13:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-06 13:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-06 13:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-06 13:41 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-06 13:41 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-06 13:41 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-06 13:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-06 13:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-06 14:04 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-06 14:04 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-06 17:37 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-06 17:37 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-06 17:37 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-07 6:38 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-07 6:38 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-07 6:38 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-07 14:14 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-07 14:14 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 6:55 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-10 6:55 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-10 9:47 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-10 9:47 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-10 9:47 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-10 13:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 13:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 14:02 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-10 14:02 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-10 14:02 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-10 14:20 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 14:20 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 14:20 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 15:34 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-10 15:34 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-10 16:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 16:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 17:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 17:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 17:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-12 18:27 ` Paul Brook
2009-08-12 18:27 ` Paul Brook
2009-08-12 18:27 ` Paul Brook
2009-08-14 8:15 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-14 8:15 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-14 13:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-14 13:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-14 13:41 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-14 13:41 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-14 13:41 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-20 13:42 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-20 13:42 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-20 13:42 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-20 14:25 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-08-20 14:25 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-08-20 14:38 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-20 14:38 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-20 14:42 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-20 14:42 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-20 14:42 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-14 13:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-14 13:49 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-14 13:49 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-14 16:25 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-14 16:25 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-14 16:25 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-20 7:31 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-20 7:31 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-20 7:31 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-20 7:44 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-20 7:44 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-20 7:44 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-20 7:55 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-20 7:55 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-20 7:55 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-20 17:10 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-20 17:10 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-20 17:10 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-25 12:43 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-25 12:43 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-25 13:00 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-25 13:00 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-25 13:00 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-25 12:43 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-14 8:15 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-10 16:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 15:34 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-10 14:20 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 14:20 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 14:20 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 13:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 23:09 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-10 23:09 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-10 23:09 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-11 0:16 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-11 0:16 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-11 0:16 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 14:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 14:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-10 15:57 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-10 15:57 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-10 15:57 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-08-06 14:04 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-06 13:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-08-06 10:38 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-06 10:35 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-06 10:35 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-06 10:35 ` Amit Shah
2009-08-05 17:57 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-05 18:32 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2009-08-05 18:32 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2009-08-03 19:57 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-27 20:46 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-27 20:32 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2009-07-27 20:22 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200908050933.42709.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.