From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
stable@kernel.org, aeb@cwi.nl, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
miltonm@bga.com, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:31:25 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100208053125.GN32246@kryten> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100208141716.FB55.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Hi,
> I didn't discuss which behavior is better. Michael said he want to apply
> his patch to 2.6.32 & 2.6.33. stable tree never accept the breaking
> compatibility patch.
>
> Your answer doesn't explain why can't we wait it until next merge window.
>
>
> btw, personally, I like page size indepent stack size. but I'm not sure
> why making stack size independency is related to bug fix.
OK sorry, I misunderstood your initial mail. I agree fixing the bit that
regressed in 2.6.32 is the most important thing. The difference in page size is
clearly wrong but since it isn't a regression we could probably live with it
until 2.6.34
Anton
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, miltonm@bga.com, aeb@cwi.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:31:25 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100208053125.GN32246@kryten> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100208141716.FB55.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Hi,
> I didn't discuss which behavior is better. Michael said he want to apply
> his patch to 2.6.32 & 2.6.33. stable tree never accept the breaking
> compatibility patch.
>
> Your answer doesn't explain why can't we wait it until next merge window.
>
>
> btw, personally, I like page size indepent stack size. but I'm not sure
> why making stack size independency is related to bug fix.
OK sorry, I misunderstood your initial mail. I agree fixing the bit that
regressed in 2.6.32 is the most important thing. The difference in page size is
clearly wrong but since it isn't a regression we could probably live with it
until 2.6.34
Anton
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-08 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-06 0:43 Stack size protection broken on ppc64 Michael Neuling
2010-02-06 4:20 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-02-06 4:20 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-02-06 10:22 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-06 10:22 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-08 0:04 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-02-08 0:04 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-02-08 0:07 ` [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit Michael Neuling
2010-02-08 0:07 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-08 0:28 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-08 0:28 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-08 5:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08 5:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08 5:11 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-02-08 5:11 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-02-08 5:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08 5:22 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08 5:31 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2010-02-08 5:31 ` Anton Blanchard
2010-02-08 6:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08 6:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08 5:37 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-08 5:37 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-08 6:05 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08 6:05 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08 7:07 ` Américo Wang
2010-02-08 7:07 ` Américo Wang
2010-02-08 7:07 ` Américo Wang
2010-02-08 7:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08 7:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-09 6:11 ` [PATCH] Restrict initial stack space expansion " Michael Neuling
2010-02-09 6:11 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-09 6:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-09 6:46 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-09 8:59 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-09 8:59 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-09 21:25 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-09 21:25 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-09 21:51 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-09 21:51 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-09 22:27 ` Helge Deller
2010-02-09 22:27 ` Helge Deller
2010-02-10 5:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-10 5:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-10 5:30 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-10 5:30 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-10 5:31 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-10 5:31 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-11 22:16 ` Helge Deller
2010-02-11 22:16 ` Helge Deller
2010-02-11 22:22 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-11 22:22 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-12 5:44 ` [PATCH] Create initial stack independent of PAGE_SIZE Michael Neuling
2010-02-12 7:20 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-12 9:02 ` Michael Neuling
2010-02-12 9:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-08 10:45 ` [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit Michael Neuling
2010-02-08 10:45 ` Michael Neuling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100208053125.GN32246@kryten \
--to=anton@samba.org \
--cc=aeb@cwi.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=miltonm@bga.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.