From: Jeff Layton <laytonjb@bellsouth.net>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Re: [lvm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] LVM reimplementationre ady for beta testing
Date: Fri Feb 1 09:43:02 2002 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C5AB7CF.5C96DDFB@bellsouth.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020201102439.B15135@sistina.com
"Heinz J . Mauelshagen" wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 03:05:56PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > (snip)
> >
> > >
> > > >LVM2 may not seem that exciting initially, since the first release is
> > > >just concentrating on reproducing LVM1 functionality. But a lot of
> > > >the reason for this rewrite is to enable us to add in the new features
> > > >that we want (such as a transaction based disk format). It's on this
> > > >new feature list that we'll be mainly competing with EVMS.
> > >
> > > Why compete, come on over and help us :-)
> >
> > You guy man!
> >
> > I've worked with Kevin a few months ago on using EVMS
> > to recover a filesystem ontop of LVM when a disk went
> > south and we had no backups
>
> It is quite intersting how many people don't take backups even though
> almost everybody claims to know that backups are crucial and some of them
> know that they are still, even though they might have RAID in place.
I was ordered by my management NOT to make backups or
I would be fired (exact words). So, I didn't. I told everyone
concerned that we HAD to have backups and follow corporate
policy. Everyone said thank you and go away. So I did.
>
>
> Well I guess it, but you didn't mention if you had success to recover.
>
> Was it quorum (we are implementing it with LVM2 BTW) which helped and have
> you been lucky that at least a part of your LVs where sitting on other than the
> gone disk? Otherwise you probably had your VG back but no usable data.
Actually, we had partial success and got back most data. Then
on a whim we tried the bad drive again, and BINGO it came back
to life! I tried every trick I know to get that drive back and spoke
with the vendor that agreed I did everything they knew how to
do. Then another admin walked in, popped it back in the case and
and it came back. I had the biggest egg on my face! Oh well, at least
we got the data back.
>
>
> > (I know, but I was told by the
> > people in charge that backups were not needed - that's why
> > I left).
>
> Probably a good choice to leave if they don't understand such basics
> and you couldn't convince them.
<vent>
My manager at that time couldn't spell UNIX, doesn't have a college
degree of any type and has never taken a single college course. My lead
admin can only spell "Sun" even though he claims to have a Linux box at
home and is pretty much hated by all UNIX/Linux admins (as well as
most NT admins as well). He is the king of micro managers (and I have
seen plenty of these in the aerospace industry).
Thanks for the venting time and space. I apologize.
</vent>
>
>
> > I really like EVMS and can't wait for it to be in 2.5 and
> > then 2.6 (just keep up the patches for 2.4 please :)
>
> EVMS hallelujah on linux-lvm? ;-)
I like EVMS and it's concepts. However, I'm currently using LVM
(I learned LVM on HPUX, so it was trivial to move to LVM on
Linux!). So, I guess you could say that I started with LVM - like it,
use it, depend on it; moving on to EVMS after some experimentation
and testing. I hope the two merge at some point to avoid
proprietary-isms that seem to be coming.
Plus, I'm interested in the Open Cluster Framework
developments with EVMS. I don't know if these kinds of
things are happening with LVM or not.
Jeff
>
>
> >
> > Jeff Layton
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Steve
> > >
> > > EVMS Development - http://www.sf.net/projects/evms
> > > Linux Technology Center - IBM Corporation
> > > (512) 838-9763 EMAIL: SLPratt@US.IBM.COM
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-lvm mailing list
> > > linux-lvm@sistina.com
> > > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> > > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-lvm mailing list
> > linux-lvm@sistina.com
> > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
>
> *** Software bugs are stupid.
> Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
> Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
> 56242 Marienrachdorf
> Germany
> Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
> FAX 924446
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-01 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-31 13:54 [linux-lvm] Re: [lvm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] LVM reimplementation ready for beta testing Steve Pratt
2002-01-31 19:52 ` Steve Pratt
2002-01-31 12:52 ` Joe Thornber
2002-02-01 3:47 ` Joe Thornber
2002-02-01 3:55 ` [Evms-devel] " Arjan van de Ven
2002-02-01 9:55 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-01-31 13:09 ` Joe Thornber
2002-02-01 4:04 ` Joe Thornber
2002-02-01 4:13 ` [linux-lvm] " Arjan van de Ven
2002-02-01 10:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-01-31 13:35 ` Joe Thornber
2002-02-01 4:31 ` [linux-lvm] " Joe Thornber
2002-02-01 5:06 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [Evms-devel] " Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-02-01 11:05 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-02-01 8:32 ` [linux-lvm] " Alan Cox
2002-02-01 14:44 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-01 8:59 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [Evms-devel] " Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-02-01 14:58 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2002-02-01 16:01 ` [evms-devel] [linux-lvm] " Kevin Corry
2002-02-01 21:59 ` Kevin Corry
2002-01-31 21:51 ` Joe Thornber
2002-02-03 6:22 ` Joe Thornber
2002-02-01 17:17 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-01 23:30 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-02 7:40 ` Andrew Clausen
2002-02-02 13:39 ` Andrew Clausen
2002-02-02 13:30 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-02 19:42 ` Alan Cox
2002-01-31 14:05 ` [linux-lvm] Re: [lvm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] LVM reimplementationre ady " Jeff Layton
2002-02-01 3:29 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-02-01 9:43 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2002-02-05 8:04 ` James Hawtin
2002-02-05 8:09 ` Patrick Caulfield
2002-02-05 11:13 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-05 12:28 ` [linux-lvm] (OT) Backups (was Re: LVM reimplementationre ady for beta testing...) Chad C. Walstrom
2002-02-06 13:13 ` [linux-lvm] Backup costs (was: LVM reimplementationre) Benjamin Scott
2002-02-06 13:39 ` Daniel Whicker
2002-02-06 13:46 ` James Mello
2002-02-06 14:35 ` Anders Widman
2002-02-07 3:01 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07 3:17 ` Petro
2002-02-07 4:34 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07 7:19 ` Petro
2002-02-07 7:54 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07 3:55 ` Dieter Stueken
2002-02-06 13:46 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-06 13:48 ` Theo Van Dinter
2002-02-06 15:45 ` Austin Gonyou
2002-02-06 13:51 ` Petro
2002-02-06 13:52 ` Kirby C. Bohling
2002-02-06 13:55 ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-06 14:03 ` James Mello
2002-02-06 20:03 ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-06 20:08 ` James Mello
2002-02-06 20:11 ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-07 3:10 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07 4:53 ` Jeff Layton
2002-02-07 5:31 ` James Hawtin
2002-02-07 17:05 ` Wolfgang Weisselberg
2002-02-08 20:04 ` James Hawtin
2002-02-07 3:03 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-07 3:17 ` Petro
2002-02-07 4:15 ` Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
2002-02-12 1:00 ` Marc MERLIN
2002-01-31 15:19 ` [Evms-devel] Re: [linux-lvm] Re: [lvm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] LVM reimplementation ready for beta testing Andrew Clausen
2002-01-31 21:18 ` Andrew Clausen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-01 4:06 [linux-lvm] Re: [lvm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] LVM reimplementationre ady " STEFANG(GMX)
2002-02-01 4:18 ` Heinz J . Mauelshagen
2002-02-01 10:02 ` Steven Dake
2002-02-01 4:26 STEFANG(GMX)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C5AB7CF.5C96DDFB@bellsouth.net \
--to=laytonjb@bellsouth.net \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.