From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>,
cocci@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [cocci] Checking software run time characteristics
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 10:50:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <434583f7-7fc9-454c-afa7-9a35128aa8b8@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf59a6a58a28828d3648d6e14416d4679c585f0b.camel@sipsolutions.net>
>> Can our discussion trigger any further software improvements?
>
> You're kidding, right?
No.
> Discussions with you specifically only ever waste everyone's time.
I wonder about this view.
Various open issues are waiting for solutions and desirable collateral evolution.
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-07 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 9:31 [cocci] possible regressions in 1.1.1 -> 1.2 Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 9:48 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 9:53 ` Victor Gambier
2025-02-06 10:00 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 12:36 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-06 9:59 ` Julia Lawall
2025-02-06 10:07 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 10:12 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 13:34 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-06 10:13 ` Julia Lawall
2025-02-06 10:17 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-06 13:46 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-06 13:00 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-06 16:50 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-08 11:26 ` [cocci] Checking SmPL test cases? Markus Elfring
2025-02-08 11:58 ` Julia Lawall
2025-02-08 12:51 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-08 14:28 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-08 15:43 ` Julia Lawall
2025-02-09 8:42 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-07 7:43 ` [cocci] Checking software run time characteristics Markus Elfring
2025-02-07 7:55 ` Julia Lawall
2025-02-07 8:15 ` Markus Elfring
2025-02-07 8:59 ` Johannes Berg
2025-02-07 9:50 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2025-02-11 9:58 ` [cocci] possible regressions in 1.1.1 -> 1.2 Victor Gambier
2025-02-11 10:33 ` [cocci] Comparing software run time characteristics Markus Elfring
2025-02-12 9:52 ` [cocci] Profiling of SmPL code? Markus Elfring
2026-03-27 10:43 ` [cocci] possible regressions in 1.1.1 -> 1.2 Victor Gambier
2026-03-27 10:49 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=434583f7-7fc9-454c-afa7-9a35128aa8b8@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=cocci@inria.fr \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.